Two controllers, if they are truly ustilizing multi-pathing, would actually act in parallel and would be more reliable. R = 1-(1-R)^n so to the extent they are completely seperate ( which nothing ever truly is) they would approximate R=.9999!
I can see a lot of advantages in multicore processors like these. I wonder though about the fault tolerance for a device that uses two cores and compares the results? I would think 3 cores and voting the odd one out might be slightly more expensive but better. Along those same lines the fault tolerance and ability to function in a degraded state might be really useful as well. Sensor failure or errors related to the sensors need to be accommodated as well in a fault tolerant manner.
I am a bit leary of simply adding in more redundancy. That can also lead to more failures. Correct me if I am wrong but 2 controllers with 99% reliability each when coupled are they not then 98% reliable?
In general I learned it was better to design systems with greater reliability, test it and prove it historically in production. Then only add additional redundancy if it was really required. Some systems required redundancy as a matter of course in terms of availability for maintenance and mission critical applications. Perhaps others can weigh in on this and explain this subject a little better.
I suppose part of this is the diffference between redundant and backup components? When I served on US Navy ships we had three steam driven turbogenerators for redundancy and a diesel generator for backup. But we had only one main engine. I know the costs figure into this as well as they always do.
Lantronix Inc. has expanded its line of controllers for sensor networks with the release of a rugged controller that improves management of automation systems used in a number of industries, including manufacturing, oil and gas, and chemicals.
Inspired by the hooks a parasitic worm uses to penetrate its host's intestines, the Karp Lab has invented a flexible adhesive patch covered with microneedles that adheres well to wet, soft tissues, but doesn't cause damage when removed.
A quick look into the merger of two powerhouse 3D printing OEMs and the new leader in rapid prototyping solutions, Stratasys. The industrial revolution is now led by 3D printing and engineers are given the opportunity to fully maximize their design capabilities, reduce their time-to-market and functionally test prototypes cheaper, faster and easier. Bruce Bradshaw, Director of Marketing in North America, will explore the large product offering and variety of materials that will help CAD designers articulate their product design with actual, physical prototypes. This broadcast will dive deep into technical information including application specific stories from real world customers and their experiences with 3D printing. 3D Printing is