HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Senerjp
User Rank
Iron
Re: Definitely a trend to watch
Senerjp   10/4/2011 10:18:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Two controllers, if they are truly ustilizing multi-pathing, would actually act in parallel and would be more reliable. R = 1-(1-R)^n so to the extent they are completely seperate ( which nothing ever truly is) they would approximate R=.9999!

Ivan Kirkpatrick
User Rank
Platinum
Definitely a trend to watch
Ivan Kirkpatrick   10/3/2011 10:00:20 AM
NO RATINGS
I can see a lot of advantages in multicore processors like these.  I wonder though about the fault tolerance for a device that uses two cores and compares the results?  I would think 3 cores and voting the odd one out might be slightly more expensive but better.  Along those same lines the fault tolerance and ability to function in a degraded state might be really useful as well.  Sensor failure or errors related to the sensors need to be accommodated as well in a fault tolerant manner.

I am a bit leary of simply adding in more redundancy.  That can also lead to more failures.  Correct me if I am wrong but 2 controllers with 99% reliability each when coupled are they not then 98% reliable?

In general I learned it was better to design systems with greater reliability, test it and prove it historically in production.  Then only add additional redundancy if it was really required.  Some systems required redundancy as a matter of course in terms of availability for maintenance and mission critical applications.  Perhaps others can weigh in on this and explain this subject a little better.  

I suppose part of this is the diffference between redundant and backup components?  When I served on US Navy ships we had three steam driven turbogenerators for redundancy and a diesel generator for backup.  But we had only one main engine.  I know the costs figure into this as well as they always do.



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
A few weeks ago, Ford Motor Co. quietly announced that it was rolling out a new wrinkle to the powerful safety feature called stability control, adding even more lifesaving potential to a technology that has already been very successful.
It won't be too much longer and hardware design, as we used to know it, will be remembered alongside the slide rule and the Karnaugh map. You will need to move beyond those familiar bits and bytes into the new world of software centric design.
Made By Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
People who want to take advantage of solar energy in their homes no longer need to install a bolt-on solar-panel system atop their houses -- they can integrate solar-energy-harvesting shingles directing into an existing or new roof instead.
Jet engine maker Pratt & Whitney sees additive manufacturing as a production approach that's complementary to -- not a replacement for -- traditional manufacturing processes.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Mar 9 - 13, Implementing Motor Control Designs with MCUs and FPGAs: An Introduction and Update
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service