William K.
User Rank
Ridiculous fatigue calculations
William K.   12/21/2011 3:35:33 PM
Great sleuthing for sure. And I applaud the solution of using reference channels and checking software. That sounds a bit similar to one of the "data qualifying" steps that we once put into a system that could not tolerate being wrong, ever. It is a completely valid solution.

The problem sounds like a missing shield ground connection, most likely in the area of the multiplexer selection control lines, or perhaps in the selection signal logic area. Of course, it could also have been a "slightly bad" connection in the channel selection reporting area, which was probably in a less protected section of the board. That type of problem may also have been on the system backplane, if there was one. It would be interesting to look at that retired hardware now and see what the problem was.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Re: Root Cause?
Rob Spiegel   11/17/2011 3:14:13 PM
Hi Thinking J,

I'd like to use this story (Extremely likely ESD was the source of the problem) for an upcoming Sherlock Ohms blog. You game? We would need your name and a short bio (two or three sentences) Also, it would help to give a bit of background on the setting -- what type of company, your role, etc.

If you're willing, please let me know at rob.spiegel@ubm.com

User Rank
Re: Root Cause?
smpedi   9/28/2011 7:53:36 AM
I appreciate everyone's comments.   We, too, were not happy with abandoning the hunt before the root cause was found, but this was just one of many issues with these systems in that environment.  Considering all of the constraints, we were forced to apply a bit of Engineering Triage and forge ahead. 

User Rank
Re: Root Cause?
jmiller   9/26/2011 10:54:01 PM
I am kind of bummed the root cause wasn't discovered as well.  I know most everybody is looking at ESD as the likely cause but with so many other other options it would be interesting to know.  What I find most interesting is how it appears to be just the one postion that was affected by ESD.  Any idea why just that spot or did I miss it in the article?

User Rank
Thinking_J   9/26/2011 7:07:08 PM
accepted levels.. ( may either spelling/meaning would work?)

User Rank
Re: Root Cause?
Thinking_J   9/26/2011 7:01:54 PM
Extremely likely ESD was the source of the problem.

Had a similar problem with ESD on a system with just two boards mounted to a isolated common metal / unpainted chassis (connected directly together)... ESD to the chassis would corrupt the processor's operation and / or reset the system. Extensive shielding, grounding experiments, embedding all signals to inside layers on the pcb - with ground pours on external layers, etc.. nothing improved the system's ability to handle ESD events. The system just couldn't handle anything above 4kv discharges (we needed a min of 8-10Kv human body model for CE certification).

Final solution: a small amount of resistance (33-75 ohms) in series with all signals going between the two boards (except power / ground). Didn't effect intended signals (minimal capacitance on these lines). So... a bunch of very small SMT resistor packs (4 per 1206 size) were installed.

At the time, there were no small enough ESD devices, with low enough stray capacitance avalible to work in the space we had.

Apparently, the slight de-coupling (de-tuning/termination?) of these signal traces kept the energy (being dis-charged through the isolated chassis) from being picked up by the processor circuitry... and it is very hard to keep all grounds in a multiboard system at the same potential (with extreme rise times being involved).

After the change.. we could handle 15Kv!

Being where there is no humity (Artic or Arizona) I have seen ESD in excess of 100Kv. So even a well engineered system, can see extremes beyond excepted levels of abuse.

What next? test with a Van DeGraaff generator?

User Rank
Root Cause?
jljarvis   9/26/2011 11:06:23 AM
So you didn't troubleshoot to root cause?

I would bet that you might find the computer case wasn't really grounded to the mother board (paint on the screw bosses), or the I/O board shield wasn't tied to the computer shield, or something like that.


I agree that ESD is the likely cause, and it MAY have been cheaper to just build a mud room outside the entrance, so the parkas could be left there... but you ran the chance that you'd still have unexplainable transient events, with improper grounding and shielding.  ♠

User Rank
Re: Static discharge???
powersport   9/26/2011 10:13:10 AM
Static discharge certainly appears to be the initiator here but I don't agree that it is the cause. Static electricity is a normal and expected part of our environment and, while we could mitigate it somewhat by adding humidification, banning parkas on the premises, requiring the use of static dissipative devices, etc., none of these really addresses the true problem, which is that for whatever reason the multiplexer circuit was not designed to tolerate the higher level of static found in the arctic environment. What the author did by programming in error checking and automatic reset made the system fault tolerant, which is what the circuit designer should have done in the first place.

Incidentally, I would like to thank the author for the spelling lesson. The use of multiplexor (with an 'o') raised an eyebrow and caused me to look it up. Turns out multiplexor and multiplexer are both technically correct spellings.

User Rank
Static discharge???
lchien52   9/23/2011 10:22:16 AM
was it static discharge? Cold weather, rustling parka, sounds like a candidate fro static discharge to me.


But sometimes its easier to fix the effect rather than find and fix the cause.

Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The transformative nature of designing and making things was the overarching, common theme at separate conferences held in Boston by two giants in the PLM space: Autodesk, with its Accelerate 2015, and Siemens’s Industry Analyst Conference 2015.
Innovations such as “scrum” and virtualization methods have changed the project management game.
Extreme stress tolerance, thermal management capabilities, and EMI protection. What more could you want in a gap filler for PCBs?
Minnesota Electric Technology recently introduced a class of 3.6-inch permanent magnet DC motors for battery-powered (or solar-powered) equipment that occupies the 1/3 - 2 HP space.
On Manufacturing Day, we take a look at the vast changes and top trends in manufacturing happening now.
Design News Webinar Series
10/1/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
8/13/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 5 - 9, Standards for the Internet of Things (IoT)
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service