HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Sport
User Rank
Silver
What I'd Reall Love to See....
Sport   9/13/2011 10:21:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Imagine how things could change if there were a real effort to reduce the cost of management....  Perhaps we could outsource these multimillion dollar positions to India or Pakistan where they could do the same jobs for pennies on $10.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
They're STILL missing the point
TJ McDermott   9/12/2011 11:47:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Can you purchase a car in a reasonable manner with the features YOU want?  Assuredly NOT.  One must purchase opetion "packages" even though you may only one one of the options.  How many other unwanted options will a diabetic need to purchase along with the on-board glucose monitor?

Does anyone feel they get value from the dealership from which they purchase the vehicle?  There's an opportunity here for a smart automobile manufacturer.

Leave the internal options to be added by the dealership, making them add some real value.  Use standard interfaces (like USB ports, or Firewire, or something similar) for easy installation.  Let the consumer pick what they want.

It's time to see something truly different come from the auto industry.  Henry Ford brought assembly line mass production to the industry; it's time to meld that with the ability to provide customization.

Jack Rupert, PE
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Acquire or partner?
Jack Rupert, PE   9/12/2011 5:27:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Interestingly enough, on the battery front, Johnson Controls and Saft have dissolved their partnership.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Acquire or partner?
Beth Stackpole   9/12/2011 11:53:54 AM
NO RATINGS
I think it's still possible to achieve competitive advantage even with the partnership model. You saw (and still see) a lot of this in the IT industry (they used to refer to it as co-opetiion). Sure, there were varying degrees of success and there were casualties along the way, but some of the controversial partnerships (IBM/Microsoft) were what was needed to get the PC industry off the ground. Perhaps the same situation applies here.

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Acquire or partner?
Alexander Wolfe   9/12/2011 10:39:43 AM
NO RATINGS
Seems to me this is just a new, financially prudent version of what the big car makers used to do when they wanted to get into new platforms or markets -- they'd acquire it. (Like GM did w Saab etc.) So now there's no cash for acquistions, so they partner instead. And of course this raises the big question: How does a car maker maintain a lead/proprietary technology if everyone's partnering with everyone else. The end course of that road map is every car becomes a commodity. In which case, ultimately, the Chinese (one day will) win.



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
A team from MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL) has developed a breakthrough new multi-material 3D printer.
The trend to automation development software emphasizing configurable objects, versus structured programming, takes a step forward.
Everyone working in MEMS is chasing the ever-elusive golden wafer. But there is a moral to this story, and help is on the way.
Despite pervasive emphasis on “faster, sooner, better,” companies that have multiple design cycles a year only update their approved vendor lists on an annual basis. Maybe it's time to rethink this.
Taking energy from renewable sources, recycling existing energy, and using components that don’t need much energy at all are becoming critical industrial and consumer design criteria.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
8/13/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/24/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/11/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Aug 31 - Sep4, Embedded System Design Techniques™ - Writing Portable and Robust Firmware in C
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service