HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>
Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any lessons to be learned?
Beth Stackpole   9/6/2011 7:46:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the intel, Jerry. Are you an enthusiast or are you actively involved in any of these electric drag racing efforts?

I have to agree with a number of points made by mellowfellow, including his point about how the original automotive industry evolved along the lines of what's happening currently in the EV world. I also think there's merit to the idea that even though EVs are still not cost effective, it isn't necessarily a turn off for everyone. As mellowfellow notes, many people don't make buying designs about cars or phones or whatever simply based on the numbers, but rather let emotional factors drive decision making. So, if someone really wants (and can afford) an EV, they're going to go for it even if the technology is far from perfected.



RealTimeFirmWare
User Rank
Iron
Re: Queckest Electric Dragster in the World
RealTimeFirmWare   9/6/2011 6:12:12 PM
NO RATINGS
The drag times seem kinda slow!  Back in the 1980's, I attended several days of electric vehicle races at  Firebird Raceway outside of Phoenix.  Most of the teams were high school students.  There were a few colleges represented and a couuple pros.

The slowerst quarter mile time was 10.56 seconds.  There was a pro, with a car named, White Lightning, who consistently had times of 9 to 10 seconds.  There were some electric go carts with lead acid batteries that achieved quarter mile times of 8 1/2 seconds.

Most of the vehicles were not street legal, as those in this article seem to be, but even with new battery technologies, the performance quoted does not appear to be as good as was achieved 25 years ago.

Jerry dycus
User Rank
Gold
Re: Any lessons to be learned?
Jerry dycus   9/6/2011 4:09:01 PM
NO RATINGS
  Hi Beth,

          What they did is work hard and spent the money and over time built great machines.  DC Series motors have tons of instant torque starting up, 3 times as much as most AC motors and in many cases we could buy them for scrap prices, clean them up or rebuild them for little cost.

        DC controllers only need 1 power output  while AC needs at least 3 x's the silicon  and other things, making them much more costly.

         The Zilla was, maybe still is the highest output for an EV controller and until recently, you couldn't get anywhere near the power, 600+kw, in AC.

          If Detroit wanted they could build a DC EV using forlikt technology with an aero  composite body/chassis like the GM showcar, the Ultra-Lite.  Such a 4 seat EV with lithium batteries could go 150 miles and if done in medium tech composites instead of carbon fiber could be sold profitability for under $15k in 2014.  Then a lightweight 8kw generator in a rear quarter panel would give it unlimited range at more than 100mpg solves any lingering range worries.

        Then thre are the cool 2 and 3wh EV's with or without cabins.  Recently the Lightning EV MC became the fastest production MC in the US of any type at 239mph if I remember right.

         There will be many with/without  cabin MC 100 mile  EV's for commuting to crosscountry with 300 mile ranges and 15 minute recharge times because they are light, very aero so need much smaller battery packs, motors, etc.  These  I think in 10 yrs will be the trend because they will cost 25% to run vs an ICE and as they are more simple, as the price of lithium batts drops, cost less to build too.

          Present production lithium cells like Tesla uses cost under $250kwhr now in 1,000 cell lots to anyone who wants them.  That proves that materials are under $175/kwhr so as production ramps up, even these costs will drop. 

        

melllowfelllow
User Rank
Gold
Re: NOT faster than a Bugatti Veyron
melllowfelllow   9/6/2011 3:36:40 PM
NO RATINGS
I do not recall seeing anything written that WZ was faster - only that it was quicker.

I'm sure that Mr. Wayland does not actively follow Bugatti's products. He obviously was using stale data from one of the older, cheaper $1,700,000 models. He probably was not aware of the latest numbers for the new 2011-2012 Bugatti Veyron, with its modest sticker price increase is faster and quicker. Or possibly the WZ is quicker in the 1/8 mile. It really doesn't matter - JW could build a 'fleet of Zombies' for the $,$$$,$$$.$$ of one Veyron

Bugatti Veyron Super Sport: 267 mph, 0-60 in 2.4 secs. Aluminum, Narrow Angle 8 Liter W16 Engine with 1200 hp, base price is $2,400,000.

Of course there is always the caveat that the WZ might be quicker now than when the article was sourced.  :-)

EdNowak
User Rank
Iron
NOT faster than a Bugatti Veyron
EdNowak   9/6/2011 2:05:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Wayland's White Zombie Datson may be fast, but it's NOT faster that a Veryron. Here are the numbers for the Bugatti Veyron Super Sport:

0-60 mph  -  2.4 sec
0-100 mph  -  5.0 sec
1/4 mile  -  9.7 sec
Top speed  -  268 mph

melllowfelllow
User Rank
Gold
Re: EV's still aren't cost effective
melllowfelllow   9/6/2011 1:25:43 PM
NO RATINGS
WRT Wayland's EV being a drag car - Do you know how he gets to the drag strip?? He drives. Did you know that the vehicle has been on out of state road trips?? Although not a major feat from Portland, I know that theWZ has been on road trips to WA - I think that I read the details on his web site.

The WZ definitely has a racing bent, but if you have ever seen folks race their street cars, many remove the spare tire and extra seats for racing.

WRT cost effective:

Possibly not. Anyone who buys the first [or makes the first] items is not going to get in on the cost benefits. It is interesting that this 'cost effective thing' comes up a lot with EVs. The irony is that in the US [where I currently reside] it appears that the number of purchases made by americans on a purely cost effective basis is near 0%. This applies to clothing, appliances, houses, automobiles, phones, computers, etc. For example, a friend might purchase an economy car and rule out a 'statistically better automobile' because it is 'ugly'.

Yes, I would agree the EVs are not exactly cost effective - but I do not know anyone who purchased an automobile solely based on numbers.

Contrarian
User Rank
Gold
EV's still aren't cost effective
Contrarian   9/6/2011 1:02:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Not to diminish Mr. Wayland's accomplishments with the the White Zombie, but being "street legal" is a lot different from "daily driver".  All "street legal" means is that it has lights, a horn and windshield wipers.  Last time I saw it, it had only a driver's racing bucket seat and very little else for an interior.  It's a one of a kind, purpose-built machine to test and refine high performance electric drivelines, controllers and batteries, not so much for practical transportation.  I suspect the only street parts left of that Datsun is the sheet metal.  You would expect this of any drag car, just pointing out it's not a typical street car.

It's true that a big part of drag racing is the noise.  To hear EV's drag race is not unlike duelling vacuum cleaners.  It's more fun when an EV is pitted against a snarling V8, who's noise drowns out the whine of the EV's motor and driveline, and it just silently pulls away as though the guy with the V8 left his parking brake on.

EV's are fun.  I put 50K miles on my Chevy S-10 conversion.  But the realities of cost of ownership caught up with it and I couldn't justify putting yet another $2500 pack of batteries in it.  I understand that contemporary NiMH and Lithium packs in commercial EV's would give much better cycle life, but at a price.  A price that in terms of the typical consumer is difficult to justify.  Combustion vehicles have had a huge head start in terms of economies of scale and refinement of design, and for the most part you're going to end up with a very reliable and long lasting vehicle.  EV's still require maintenance and repairs and when you factor all the operating expenses as a whole (registration, tax, insurance, electricty), in the end any cost savings realized with the cheaper "fuel" are vastly offset by the acquisition cost of the vehicle.  Even if the "fuel" were free, my costs per mile in terms of amortized battery expenses was more than the equivalent cost of gasoline for my truck at $4 a gallon.  I haven't run the numbers for the current offerings of commercial EV's, but I suspect the numbers for those aren't much better with their commensurately more expensive batteries and management systems.  EV's will never enjoy more than a niche market until they can offer a feature or value that current combustion vehicles can't.  Granted, things have come a long way since the '60's Electrovair or the '70's Citicar, but EV's of today that are more expensive to own than their gasoline counterparts still aren't the answer.  Get the costs down and maybe they'll get there.

If you really like the idea of driving an EV, then that's great.  I'm here to tell you they're a fun way to get around.  Just understand that this "fun" will cost you extra.

melllowfelllow
User Rank
Gold
Re: Queckest Electric Dragster in the World
melllowfelllow   9/6/2011 1:02:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Jimmy, you left out the most important part - the record was set on

December 30, 2007

N. Christopher Perry
User Rank
Gold
Re: Where are the revolutionary designs?
N. Christopher Perry   9/6/2011 12:48:06 PM
NO RATINGS
One particular reason for not putting a motor in each wheel hub is the resulting increase in un-sprung weight.  In general, increases in un-sprung weight reduce the suspension system's natural frequency, which adversely affects the handling characteristics of the vehicle.  Offsetting the weight of a hub motor is extremely difficult, so in the end building up a conventional driveline ends up being more cost effective.

 

Jimmy
User Rank
Iron
Queckest Electric Dragster in the World
Jimmy   9/6/2011 12:47:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Very well written article, too bad it does not mention the Quickest Electric Dragster on the Planet!!  it is the Current Eliminator V that holds the current record of  7.956 seconds at 159.85 miles per hour  in the quarter mile!!!   See it at http://www.currenteliminator.net/  The record was made using Altairnano Lithium Titanate Batteries.  There are many videos on You tube with the Owner Dennis Berube that has held the record since the early 1990's......  The numbers tell the story.

Jimmy

<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Take a look through these film and TV robots from 1990 through 1994.
The Soofa is an urban smart bench that provides mobile device charging as well as collects environmental information via wireless sensors.
Sciaky, provider of electron-beam additive manufacturing (EBAM) services, will start selling these machines commercially in September. The company has used its EBAM 3D printing technology for making very large, high-value, metal prototypes and production parts for aerospace and defense OEMs.
At this year’s Google I/O, the spotlight was pointed on gender inequality in the high-tech industry. Google has established a new initiative that it hopes will even out the playing field, Made w/Code. Part of this initiative will fund free online courses in basic coding.
Self-driving vehicle technology could grow rapidly over the next two decades, with nearly 95 million “autonomous-capable” cars being sold annually around the world by 2035, a new study predicts.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Aug 4 - 8, Introduction to Linux Device Drivers
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: August 12 - 14
Sponsored by igus
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service