HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Loring Wirbel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cost vs. Performance
Loring Wirbel   7/26/2011 11:38:41 AM
NO RATINGS
There's a simple rule of thumb that can be used.  SMP is great for brute force computation, though it more or less runs out of steam at eight-way unless multithreading and task parallelism gets better.  Not many embedded tasks are brute-force symmetric.  But some MPU vendors will sell symmetric multicore the same way they'll sell Ferraris - if someone is silly enough to buy a 16-way i7 because it seems to be macho, well, that's their error.  Better to look for a Freescale, Cavium, etc.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
A case for interdisciplinary skills
Beth Stackpole   7/26/2011 9:21:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Seems like this is just one more example pointing up the growing requirement for engineers to shore up their interdisciplnary skills. As Loring well points out, designers evaluating multicore processors for embedded applications are going to need to understand a whole lot more about software.

 

 

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Cost vs. Performance
Alexander Wolfe   7/26/2011 8:44:22 AM
NO RATINGS
To me, the line is getting very blurred between so-called "embedded" devices and microprocessors. At the end of the day, I guess it's the application which defines whether the part supplying the computing cycles is embedded or not, but it sure seems to be that vendors are very happy to upsell (maybe that should be upCELL, or upcycle) engineers, when lower cost, lower power consuming processors would work just as well. The apps you cite, such as routers, clearly benefit from these beefier embedded multicore parts. And robotics apps do too. But somewhere along the apps continuum, the needs of the vendors (to sell higher ASP processors) and those of engineers (staying within cost and power budgets) start to diverge.

Douglas Smock
User Rank
Platinum
Impressive
Douglas Smock   7/26/2011 8:43:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks you Loring. This is an interesting development.



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Back in January we asked our readers to send us photos of their desks and workbenches – and they delivered.
At this year's MD&M West show, lots of material suppliers are talking about new formulations for wearables and things that stick to the skin, whether it's adhesives, wound dressings, skin patches and other drug delivery devices, or medical electronics.
Family of industrial PCs is preconfigured to work with Aerotech's A3200 motion controller.
The US Congress has extended an important tax credit for solar energy, a move that’s good news for future investments in this type of alternative energy and for many stakeholders in the solar industry.
People don’t like change, but as did the three industrial revolutions before it, Industry 4.0 will deliver painful change and irrecoverable harm to those that don’t adapt.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
1/28/2016 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/8/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/18/2016 11:00 AM PT | 2:00 PM ET
2/24/2016 11:00 AM PT | 2:00 PM ET
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 11 - 15, Designing ARM Devices Using Segger Tools
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service