Electronics & Test
Ford, GM Face Off on Truck Engines

GM's new 5.3L V8 EcoTec engine, left, boosts fuel efficiency by using cylinder deactivation to act as a four-cylinder engine at light loads. Ford's 3.5L EcoBoost engine, right, boosts performance by using twin-turbocharger technology to create a more dense mix of air and fuel in each cylinder.  (Source: GMC, left; Ford Motor Co., right)
GM's new 5.3L V8 EcoTec engine, left, boosts fuel efficiency by using cylinder deactivation to act as a four-cylinder engine at light loads. Ford's 3.5L EcoBoost engine, right, boosts performance by using twin-turbocharger technology to create a more dense mix of air and fuel in each cylinder.
(Source: GMC, left; Ford Motor Co., right)

Return to Article

View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 3/4  >  >>
User Rank
Re: Heavy hitters
rdelaplaza   2/18/2013 5:37:05 PM
Problem here is that the average American Joe attaches his manhood to the power of his vehicle, thanks to brain neutralizing animal testosterone and stupid brainwashing marketing trickery.

To give you an idea critically analize some (and every one) of the pickup truck advertising pieces. the  P O W E R obsession sells to every redneck and his cousin in this country.

When that way of thinking stops (it's going to take SOMETHING) and evolution makes their brains grow beyond that; then the USA average male will consider an electric truck as an everyday vehicle.

They are already a reality... everyday fleet vehicles silently perform their nonpoluting duties, behind the anonimous task of the delivery drivers of big corporations.

Check this guys, THEY ARE DOING IT ALREADY  http://www.smithelectric.com/

So on the same note; when the electric trucks, start BEATING THE CRAP of internal combustion engines, same redneck stupid marketing tricks will help to increase the sales of the electric ones...

But before it happens somebody has to come with an electrical motor that MAKES A LOT OF VERY LOUD NOISE ! !

User Rank
Ford v. GM
airbearzln   2/18/2013 1:04:12 PM
"Aint no good little motor good as a good big motor".   A fortiari for trucks.  I forgot who said it, I think maybe Max "Old Yeller" Balchowsky.  I have a Silverado with the 6 liter motor, best truck I have ever owned, and I am old, owned a lot of trucks.

User Rank
Re: Engine Changes
Watashi   2/18/2013 10:19:15 AM
I concur

I would also like to see towing and hauling performance over the long run.  Smaller engines tend to wear out faster when put under the stress of towing.  

Anecdotally - I had a Ford 4.6L F150 that showed a loss of power much more quickly than its predecessors that had 302 c.i. engines.  However, when they were new, the 4.6L and 302 c.i. trucks were very comparable power-wise.

User Rank
Re: Engine Changes
NiteOwl_OvO   2/18/2013 10:14:07 AM

GM first offered cylinder deactivation in 1981 on the Cadillac L62 V8. They have had plenty of time to develop that system, I think. I believe most of the problems GM experienced in the past were in the electronics and not the mechanical parts of the engine. Time will tell whether customers like the system or not and I believe that may be the main issue.

User Rank
Turbo Reliability
Watashi   2/18/2013 9:56:47 AM
I have always been a Ford guy (and GM hater) but have concerns about Ford's approach. For anyone who remembers the early days of production turbo vehicles, reliability was a huge issue that should not be overlooked.

Granted, turbos have come a long way in terms of reliability (i.e. modern turbo diesels on 1 ton trucks), but they are still a bit costly.  When you consider that a lot of these trucks will be used for work and play off road, the more conventional (and reliable) 'multi-displacement' technology seems better.  The dust, vibration, and shock of off road driving are very hard on vehicle components.  With the twin turbo Ford V-6 you will have twice the number of expensive turbo units exposed to it.

The question of 'turbo lag' is whole other conversation; but can these new turbos overcome the bad taste gasoline turbo powertrains left consumers with last time around?

Disclaimers -My 2007 Dodge Ram 1500 has a multi-displacement 5.7L V-8 that has been very reliable and gets me around 15 mph highway (10 mph towing a 3 horse trailer).  My uncle has one of the new Ford turbo F150s and is very pleased with the mileage (over 20 mph highway) and power, but he doesn't tow and rarely goes off road.

User Rank
Would you like fries with that?
NiteOwl_OvO   2/18/2013 9:53:36 AM

The light truck is as American as burgers and fries. Competition from overseas and new emissions requirements are putting a strain on the domestic manufacturers. It's nice to see our favorite trucks are in good hands.

GM has finally rolled out DI on the small block. I think they had variable valve timing and displacement on demand technologies on the previous generation with the exception of the 4.8L. GM's small block is very light and compact, produces exceptional power from idle to redline and has proven it can go the distance. If the updated small block can maintain that and produce the desired efficiency and emissions, then GM will be well equipped to satisfy customers who like V8s. You gotta love the sound of a well tuned V8.

US manufacturers have been shy about offering turbocharged gasoline engines for some time. There have been plenty of successes, but drivability concerns, fuel efficiency and insurance costs have limited the market. Modern turbochargers, engine management systems and traction control have resolved nearly all of the drivability concerns and the availability of DI for gasoline engines (DI has been used on diesel engines for decades) has changed the image of turbocharged gasoline engines from gas hogs to efficient and reliable compact powerhouses. The success of Ford's Echo Boost engines proves that the market is there. Time will tell if these modern small displacement turbo powerhouses can go the distance.

In the end both approaches are great solutions to the same problem. If variety adds spice to life, then the American light truck will continue to satisfy the palettes of truck buyers for years to come.

User Rank
OLD_CURMUDGEON   2/18/2013 9:52:32 AM
Call me a "DOUBTING THOMAS", and I qualify that to state that battery technology is NOWHERE in my expertise, BUT I believe that there would be many obstacles to mounting a large set of batteries into a truck chassis.  One of these would be that since many trucks are weight-limited, there would be a liability to its ability to carry cargo, since GVW would be affected negatively.  Furthermore, UNLESS there is a paradigm shift in battery chemistry, I don't see this energy storage device as being viable for ANY vehicle, outside the limited use casual vehicles presently on the market.

It made the news reports in the past week or so that even the principal engineer responsible for the TOYOTA PRIUS admitted that the ICE will be the primary power source of vehicles for decades to come.  However, I DO believe that the chemical, mechanical, electrical engineers will find a satisfactory solution to increasing the overall efficiency of the modern transportation vehicle such that this discussion may become a moot point.

Finally, I also believe that the governments SHOULD NOT be so adamant in their prescriptions for the future.  There is NO doubt among rational-thinking people that when governments overbear, the results ARE almost always disasterous.

User Rank
Re: Engine Changes
GTOlover   2/18/2013 9:30:16 AM
I would add longevity. If those turbos start going out at 100K then Ford will have a reputation problem. GM must also prove that cylinder deactivation can really save fuel. I am sure there is some savings, but how much? Then the question is how does cylinder deactivation affect the V8's longevity?

If these issues come up and it affects the truck user, the manufacturer will be pounded for under-developed technology and reputation will be at stake.

User Rank
Engine Changes
Mydesign   2/18/2013 3:26:06 AM
2 saves
Charles, I think automobile/mechanical engineers are the best peoples to judge about these changes. From user point of view, better power and high mileage are the concern points and any changes for attaining these two goals may get widely accepted..

User Rank
Re: Heavy hitters
naperlou   2/15/2013 11:35:27 AM
Cabe, that is a good idea.  A good solution for trucks might be something like a diesel electric locomotive (this is what all diesel locomotives are now, so we generally don't put in the electric).  Diesel locomotives have been evolving to hybrids with batteries.  This sllows them to recover energy in breaking, for example, and to respond more quickly to speed and load changes.  The engine (ICE or microturbine) still provides the main source of electricity.  They tend to be more expensive to build, but easier and cheaper to maintain. 

<<  <  Page 3/4  >  >>
Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Most of the new 3D printers and 3D printing technologies in this crop are breaking some boundaries, whether it's build volume-per-dollar ratios, multimaterials printing techniques, or new materials types.
Check out these gifts that will make you the hero of your Secret Santa party.
Voting has closed on our 2015 Gadget Freak of the Year contest, but it is not game over yet for two competing projects.
Independent science safety company Underwriters Laboratories is providing new guidance for manufacturers about how to follow the latest IEC standards for implementing safety features in programmable logic controllers.
Automakers are adding greater digital capabilities to their design and engineering activities to promote collaboration among staff and suppliers, input consumer feedback, shorten product development cycles, and meet evolving end-use needs.
Design News Webinar Series
11/10/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/29/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/20/2015 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/2/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 6 - 10, Building Raspberry Pi Controllers with Python
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service