Siemens is among six top-tier project partners -- alongside General Electric, Rolls-Royce, Procter & Gamble, Dow, and Lockheed Martin -- that have donated at least $5 million to the project and will participate as key contributors to the digital manufacturing lab, which will be located in Chicago. The effort is also supported by 40 industry partners and more than 30 organizations from academia, the government, and broader community. All told, partners have contributed $250 million more in seed money on top of the government's $70 million.
Grindstaff said the lab will be modeled after research institutions like the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany, which conducts research and develops processes and technology, and then looks for commercial partners to take them to market.
Specifically, Siemens is contributing its product lifecycle management (PLM) software to the lab. The software is used globally by the manufacturing industry to design, develop, and manufacture products in a number of industries, including automotive, aerospace, consumer products, medical devices, shipbuilding, apparel, and machinery.
The new Lightweight and Modern Metals Manufacturing Innovation Institute also will bring together a consortium of institutions and led by a key actor in the industry, Detroit-based EWI, a manufacturing consulting organization. The goal of the institute is to facilitate research in the development of lightweight metals in the production process and to make their use more cost effective and feasible. Lighter-weight metals increasingly are being used to replace heavier, more traditional metals in the production process, but their use is still expensive and not commercially viable for all industries.
The White House is also now taking bids on proposals from organizations to form a third institute for research in composite materials. The Department of Energy will offer $70 million in funding to create the institute, which will seek strategies to overcome current barriers to using advanced composites in a number of industries.
Being from Chicago I can understand President Obama's desire to fund a lab here. What I fear is teh teh "Chicago Way" will drain the lab of its resources and not have anything to show for it. I think a better location, such as a university town, would have a better chance of producing results.
Thank you for your comment, SALMON. The model you mention does seem to be the way things work in the United States. There is a lot of innovation and research that comes from government-funded activities and out of universities, and then researchers--once they have a solid prototype--seek commercialization through companies, whether private or public companies. The new lab will work in this way as well. If you are familiar with the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany, it will be a similar model to that institution.
We in Europe are following with interest and admiration the efforts to improove manifacturing activities in USA.
I am personaly courious to know whot "open" really means: will the results freely avialable, or the results will be offered to the market for a proce ?
I have just red the book from Mazucato , and american.italian resarcher, that affirm that the base for innovation in USA derive from public, state funded, researche activity and the privet compamy are only assembling, packagin, selling the new product ( and avoiding USA tax !).
Will be this model at the basis of the new centers ?
Waiting for replllllies . Thanks Mario Salmon Italy
The 100% solar-powered airplane Solar Impulse 2 is prepping for its upcoming flight, becoming the first plane to fly around the world without using fuel. It's able to do so because of above-average performance by all of the technologies that go into it, especially materials.
With major product releases coming from big names like Sony, Microsoft, and Samsung, and big investments by companies like Facebook, 2015 could be the year that virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) finally pop. Here's take a look back at some of the technologies that got us here (for better and worse).
Good engineering designs are those that work in the real world; bad designs are those that don’t. If we agree to set our egos aside and let the real world be our guide, we can resolve nearly any disagreement.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.