HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
News
Design Hardware & Software

Embedded Expert: No Pedal Misapplication in Toyota Case

Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 4/4
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A software glitch after all
Rob Spiegel   11/8/2013 11:56:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Apparently, though, adding safety measures after the fact is an admission of guilt, a signal (and effectively proof) that the earlier vehicles are not safe.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A software glitch after all
naperlou   11/8/2013 11:26:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Software development for automobiles is a definitely a safety critical area.  This became crirical with drvice by wire.  I had a 2002 car that had an electronic engine management system, for example.  This was before "full" drive by wire.  When the EMS started to go, I was on my way home on the Interstate.  I could still drive the car, however.  It just ran rough. 

With full drive by wire, we should be using methods and techniques used for avionics and other safety critical systems.  This is becoming the case, but we will have a large overhang of vehicles, such as the Toyotas, that do not meet these standards.  Considering that any programming is amortized over a large number of units, adding this safety critical approach should not be costly.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A software glitch after all
Rob Spiegel   11/8/2013 10:33:50 AM
NO RATINGS
I never realized that change to improve a flaw is a form of admission of guilt. Wow. That's one strange moral conundrum.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: For the plaintiff ... (but) designated by the court
Charles Murray   11/8/2013 10:11:01 AM
NO RATINGS
The dynamometer testing was for the purpose of demonstrating that the failsafes did not prevent loss of throttle control, TJ. I don't know if any simulation was run in court. Barr's testimony essentially said this: Skid marks weren't compatible with pedal misapplication; there was no "sticky pedal" recall for this model year; there was no pedal entrapment; and the car had been inspected a dozen times for mechanical problems, such as throttle blockages. Given those facts, along with the fact that dyno testing showed "gaps" in the failsafes, it was more likely than not that a software malfuntion caused the throttle problem.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
For the plaintiff ... (but) designated by the court
TJ McDermott   11/8/2013 9:56:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Doesn't that seem contradictory?  Never mind, I'm assuredly not a legal expert.

15 months, 2000 hours, and an 800 page report.  If I was footing the bill, I'd ask for a simulation showing how these discovered safety holes would manifest into loss of throttle control.  Having the simulation run in court, explaining each condition that leads up to loss of throttle control, would seem to be a slam-dunk for the plaintiff.

 

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: A software glitch after all
tekochip   11/8/2013 9:47:09 AM
NO RATINGS
If they made the change a jury could have seen this as demonstrating culpability, suggesting that the change was made because Toyota was aware of a system flaw.  Unfortunately, not fixing known flaws is a common theme because of litigation fears.


Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
A software glitch after all
Rob Spiegel   11/8/2013 8:39:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Nice story, Chuck. Perhaps the most telling line comes at the very end: "Toyota could have done this (implement a brake-throttle override system) in 2002 without any extra cost to the vehicle." 

<<  <  Page 4/4
Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Self-driving vehicle technology could grow rapidly over the next two decades, with nearly 95 million “autonomous-capable” cars being sold annually around the world by 2035, a new study predicts.
MIT’s Senseable City Lab recently announced the program’s next big project: “Local Warming.” The concept involves saving on energy by heating the occupants within a room, not the room itself.
The fun factor continues to draw developers to Linux. This open-source system continues to succeed in the market and in the hearts and minds of developers. Design News will delve into this territory with next week's Continuing Education Class titled, “Introduction to Linux Device Drivers.”
Dean Kamen tells an audience at MD&M East 2014 how his team created the DEKA Arm to meet DARPA's challenge to design a better prosthetic arm for wounded veterans.
The new draw-it-on-a-napkin is the CAD program. As CAD programs become more ubiquitous and easier to use, they have replaced 2D sketching for early concepting.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Aug 4 - 8, Introduction to Linux Device Drivers
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: August 12 - 14
Sponsored by igus
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service