HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
News
Electronics & Test

Slideshow: Boeing Underestimated Possibility of Battery Fire

View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
Page 1/3  >  >>
Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Troubling news
Elizabeth M   3/13/2013 6:16:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Well this is certainly a troubling development in your excellent continued coverage of this, Chuck. Considering the number of battery incidents that occurred so quickly in succession, I would say this was a gross underestimation on their part. I would expect more from a company like Boeing, especially when lives are at stake. It's not like they started making airplanes yesterday.

g_ost
User Rank
Gold
Re: Troubling news
g_ost   3/13/2013 8:06:03 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm sure that  NTSB will implement a test with a "thermal runaway battery state" to check B787 for the worst scenario again.

There was a lot of information about the battery but nothing about the plane maintenance procedures. The Li-ion batteryes require complex electronics control which are in standby or switched off during " while the aircraft was being cleaned after a flight".

GTOlover
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Troubling news
GTOlover   3/13/2013 8:20:06 AM
NO RATINGS
It also seems that more questions keep coming up about these incidents and the initial testing/certification. At this point, I would be very worried at Boeing as this seems to be an issue that will not go away with some simple changes!

Thank you Charles for keeping us at DN updated regularily!

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Troubling news
tekochip   3/13/2013 8:30:29 AM
NO RATINGS
An in-flight fire is a nasty thing.  It's not like you can roll down the windows to get fresh air and then pull over to put the fire out.


GTOlover
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Troubling news
GTOlover   3/13/2013 8:32:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Maybe we start putting parachutes in those little seat pouches instead of lifevests:-)

 

loadster
User Rank
Gold
Re: Troubling news
loadster   3/13/2013 11:18:02 AM
I think the NTSB and Boeing would get a whole lot more frequent flyer mileage with the general public if they gave just a bit more disclosure on the cause and effect of the fire. Driving nails thru cells to sim shorts and desktop analysis of fault probabilities doesn't go too far with road warriors. Either excess load or unregulated charge made those batteries fail unless they really are unreliable chemistry. They weren't that old. So either the electrons going inny or outy weren't being properly managed and that's outside the battery; not where the fire happened. The longer the answer isn't focused on, the more people lose confidence in the whole design. Not fair but reputation and confidence in equipment is 98% perception and only 2% direct experience.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Troubling news
Charles Murray   3/13/2013 9:04:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Agreed, tekochip. It makes me wonder why the continued emphasis on Li-Ion.

Ken E.
User Rank
Gold
Parachutes?
Ken E.   3/14/2013 10:03:51 AM
Your comment about parachutes (for passengers) made me think of another possbility for dealing with these fires- eject the battery!

Paul Murk
User Rank
Bronze
Boeing underestimate possiblility of battery fire
Paul Murk   3/14/2013 10:21:08 AM
I have posted here before when this disaster happened. It was only a matter of time before I was proved to be correct.

Again By the manufacturing process into building this battery results in hazard in use.

The battery has good technology but mechanically the built product is dangerous.

If you ever take one apart it is a roll of toliet paper coated on both sides with electrodes.

the seperating membrane is to weak to support enviromental conditions of a plane let alone in a cell phone.

l_jhanson
User Rank
Silver
Re: Troubling news
l_jhanson   3/14/2013 10:41:34 AM
NO RATINGS
When our Li-Ion battery failed in our aftermarket radio several years ago, many of the symptoms were the same as with the 787... much heat, vapor, venting, smoke... These were NOT the result of poor charging, overloading of the circuit... none of that! You say that shorting the cell with a nail is not a satisfactory test... What do you suggest is a more appropriate test? Easy to armchair quarterback this... For us, it turned out that the nail test was a fairly accurate predictor of the results of a short circuit... And gee, guess what? Our issue turned out to be the result of an internal cell short circuit... Really, the 787 issue sounds exactly like ours, only a scale difference... I would be looking very carefully at dendrite growth causing out-gassing internal to the cell, making the cell swell. internal parts can then slide and cause unforseen shorts and it is all downhill from there!

Page 1/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Eric Chesak created a sensor that can detect clouds, and it can also measure different sources of radiation.
Festo's BionicKangaroo combines pneumatic and electrical drive technology, plus very precise controls and condition monitoring. Like a real kangaroo, the BionicKangaroo robot harvests the kinetic energy of each takeoff and immediately uses it to power the next jump.
Practicing engineers have not heeded Yoda's words.
Design News and Digi-Key presents: Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX, a crash course that will look at defining a project, selecting a target processor, blocking code, defining tasks, completing code, and debugging.
Rockwell Automation recently unveiled a new safety relay that can be configured and integrated through existing software to program safety logic in devices.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service