HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
Feature
Electronics & Test

Slideshow: Automakers Roll Out Dream Cars

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 5/6  >  >>
ChriSharek
User Rank
Gold
Re: Beauty or Efficiency?
ChriSharek   3/12/2013 10:02:48 AM
NO RATINGS
So, GM makes a $35,000 vehicle that gets 200+ MPG and consumers don't buy it. Why?  Help me understand that.    On electricity, it costs me 1/3 of using gas (at 37 MPG).  3 cents per mile instead of 10 cents per mile. 

I'm also using 100% domestic energy instead of 60% foreign oil.  How do these two things not make cents/sense to the American Consumer?

Due to this massive misunderstanding, I'm in the process of finalizing my book with my publisher - due out 3/31/13. All the costs, fuel, electricity usage, etc. 

Help me understand why the average American just wants to continue supporting the 100+ year old internal combustion engine?

GTOlover
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Beauty or Efficiency?
GTOlover   3/12/2013 9:36:58 AM
NO RATINGS
GM is clearly committed to keeping its political clout in tact.

I know you love the Volt, but it is not making the company money and if continued, expect another taxpayer bailout (see Rigby5 comment)!

GTOlover
User Rank
Platinum
Re: future bailouts
GTOlover   3/12/2013 9:33:23 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree with your premise, but we must ask ourselves why do we keep bailing out the American auto industry?

I suggest that it is a combination of politics and consumers really want those kind of cars.  Consumers say they want the cheap, high MPG cars like the rest of the world, but they do not want to drive one. I personally like my older cars, but reality is that I need a high MPG and will relegate my older cars to limited driving/collection pieces.

We all wish we could have one of these cars, but if I had the 3.4 million dollar car I would be afraid to drive it!

On the political front, well crony capitalism trumps free markets because it is about buying votes! We voters keep voting the same political hacks (both parties) and expect different results (or just any results).

ChriSharek
User Rank
Gold
Beauty or Efficiency?
ChriSharek   3/12/2013 9:32:36 AM
NO RATINGS
GM is clearly committed to improving its efficiency - but without sacrificing beauty.  I was at the Detroit Show in January.  The Corvette and the Cadillac ELR were the stars of the show.  I used to want a Corvette, but now having driven electric, there is no going back.  The ELR will be my next car.

VadimR
User Rank
Gold
Re: Not what customers want
VadimR   3/12/2013 9:29:08 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm a consumer.  I'm 32 with likely a few vehicles that I will be purchasing in my life time.  I want a very simple 80-100 mpg, very light 3 wheeled vehicle for commuting for days when the weather is not very appealing for my motorcycle or bicycle (rain/snow/salt).  The ELIO is almost it, but even they are putting 3 airbags into the vehicle.  I want a basic $5k vehicle that has a roof, is reliable, and gets great mpg.  I don't want ABS, airbags, traction control, satalite radio, GPS, remote start, power windows, power seats, etc.  I don't even need a radio.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: future bailouts
Charles Murray   3/11/2013 10:06:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I wholeheartedly agree.

Rigby5
User Rank
Gold
future bailouts
Rigby5   3/11/2013 8:58:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Three times now gasoline prices have soared and US automakers had to be bailed out because they made expensive cars with low mpg.  It happens about every decade.  It will likely happen again soon as the conflict with Iran continues.  I like these cars, but the dessert does not replace the potatoes in a meal.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Not what customers want
Charles Murray   3/11/2013 7:59:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree that consumers don't want to pay a price anywhere near what's mentioned here, Rigby5. That said, these articles always seem to pique reader interest, so I assume that somewhere deep inside, some consumers are interested, By the way, the three Lamborghinis have already been sold. Who buys them, I don't know.  

Rigby5
User Rank
Gold
Re: Not what customers want
Rigby5   3/11/2013 7:18:38 PM
Yes there will always be a place and interest in high end performance. 

But the article said this prototype showed consumer interest, and that is not true.  It shows manufacturer interest.

And no one in this country is making $10 brown shoes yet when it comes to cars.  Asia and Europe are, but we won't let them import those 80 mpg cars here, and the US makers refuse to produce our own domestic ones.  That is making the customers more and more unhappy.  These cars are nice, but all they are making are $500 shoes.  Where are the $10 brown shoes?  Hybrids are not $10 brown shoes. 

Thinking_J
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Not what customers want
Thinking_J   3/11/2013 4:28:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Simple , 80 mpg, light, .. sure people want these things but after all the manufacturers make cars that meet these simple requirements.. they will want safety, power , handling, excitement  for only $5K!

Otherwise , what is will differentiate one car from the next? or do you think we should all have brown shoes?

The automotive industry pays big bucks to to find what will sell. And they haven't found a single solution for all mankind... they compromise and produce multiple solutions with the technology they currently have.

I like the idea there is a place in the world for exotics.. on one thinks they will work for the masses.. and that is OK.

Dang! I think 26 mpg , 0-60 in 4 seconds, 1G side load..  addresses a lot of compromises.

<<  <  Page 5/6  >  >>
Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Eric Chesak created a sensor that can detect clouds, and it can also measure different sources of radiation.
Festo's BionicKangaroo combines pneumatic and electrical drive technology, plus very precise controls and condition monitoring. Like a real kangaroo, the BionicKangaroo robot harvests the kinetic energy of each takeoff and immediately uses it to power the next jump.
Practicing engineers have not heeded Yoda's words.
Design News and Digi-Key presents: Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX, a crash course that will look at defining a project, selecting a target processor, blocking code, defining tasks, completing code, and debugging.
Rockwell Automation recently unveiled a new safety relay that can be configured and integrated through existing software to program safety logic in devices.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service