HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
News
Design Hardware & Software

Update: Curiosity Rover Lands on Mars

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Threaded|Newest First|Oldest First
Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Bravo!
Dave Palmer   8/6/2012 2:24:38 PM
This is a great engineering success story.  The engineers involved deserve to be superstars.  Certainly they have contributed more to our society than Justin Bieber has.  They are the people who should be on posters on our kids' walls.

Jack Rupert, PE
User Rank
Platinum
Watch it Live?
Jack Rupert, PE   8/6/2012 3:05:16 PM
NO RATINGS
So, who stayed up to watch it land?

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Watch it Live?
tekochip   8/6/2012 3:14:16 PM
NO RATINGS
This is really a great achievement, but I don't know about seeing it live.  I did get up early to watch the lunar impact mission LCROSS in `09, and I really wish I had stayed up to watch Shoemaker Levy 9 (predictions said that it would not be visible).  In reading my post it now seems like I'm the typical Action Movie audience.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Watch it Live?
Rob Spiegel   8/6/2012 4:53:15 PM
NO RATINGS
This is great, the gadget of all gadgets. This may be as significant as any space mission since the moon landing and early shuttle missions -- especially from an engineering point of view.

jayhartvigsen
User Rank
Iron
Re: Watch it Live?
jayhartvigsen   8/7/2012 12:06:32 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't have cable so I watched it live via Space.com and nasa.gov. Just like all of the real and aborted Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo launches I was intent on witnessing every anticipated step and exulting in each success. It didn't matter that it was 14 minutes delayed. Their success reminded me of why I became an engineer. I love the feeling that comes when something I conceived of comes to fruition. What a high. As Herbert Hoover said about his career as an engineer ". . . the engineer himself looks back at the unending stream of goodness which flows from his successes with satisfactions that few professions may know. And the verdict of his fellow professionals is all the accolade he wants." Congratulations to the team!

bobjengr
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Watch it Live?
bobjengr   8/14/2012 8:43:53 PM
NO RATINGS
 I agree with you completely.  The act of "invention" is why I became an engineer.  I can't sing, can't dance, have no real musical abilities but I can design components and ( eventually) make them work.  I definitely applaud the NASA team and wish them more success and many more landings.  One question--does the NASA team for Curiosity ramain in place for the duration of the program or is the team reduced in size, consequently going on to other projects?  Always wanted to know this one. 

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Watch it Live?
TJ McDermott   8/7/2012 3:43:20 PM
NO RATINGS
The orbital relay satellite over Mars has been showing its age.  I hope the next one sent has enough bandwidth for live video.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
WOW!!!
naperlou   8/7/2012 9:05:43 AM
NO RATINGS
This is indeed a great accomplishment.  Reading about the process in previous articles, it seemed that the process was, well, a bit crazy (I think I mentioned Rube Goldberg).  Crazy or not, it worked.  This is a real engineering triumph. 

So, why are we underfunding our space program?

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: WOW!!!
NadineJ   8/7/2012 12:25:47 PM
NO RATINGS
That's funny.  I was thinking the same thing as I watched it.  Rube Goldberg or made by Acme (as purchased by Wile E. Coyote).

It was so much fun to watch!   What's next!!!??

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Re: WOW!!!
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   8/7/2012 1:44:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Hey Naperlou- I agree; -- on two points.  At the very tail of the previous article I posted a congratulatory comment after the landing on Monday morning, but I also lampooned Mr. Obama's quoted congratulatory comment as "hollow". Almost seemed as if he was betting against them. 

On the other note, comparing the technical complexities to a Rube Goldberg device, the lampoon continues. If I was given that first set of difficult variables at the onset of the challenge, (14 minute delay coupled with 7 minute descent) I think I would have suggested engineering a slower landing to take 28 minutes! Seems like an easier problem to solve!

kenish
User Rank
Platinum
Re: WOW!!!
kenish   8/7/2012 10:13:08 PM
NO RATINGS
@JimT- The insurmountable problem (at least with current understanding of physics) is the 14 minute travel time for signals.  That's a 28-minute control loop delay if Earth is involved.  It would be almost impossible to close the loop in a stable manner with Earth-based control unless the descent time is many times longer.   A slower descent requires more weight to provide deceleration which eats into useful payload.  Giving the lander more autonomy allows a faster descent time and NASA went for 100%.

More important in my mind is to push the envelope of autonomous control...the farther space probes range in the future the more necessary it will be.

True, the suspense is a big negative but that's just an issue for us humans....

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Re: WOW!!!
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   8/9/2012 1:24:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks, kenish, Good explanations, I concur with both points.  Full autonomy will be absolutely essential as un-manned craft continue reaching deeper into space.  And your logical explanation of (Slower Descent)  = ( More Fuel)  =  (Heavier Payload) makes complete sense, which I failed to consider.  Thanks for keeping me clear!

nitpicker
User Rank
Iron
Curiosity
nitpicker   8/7/2012 9:49:18 AM
NO RATINGS
I stayed to watch and while impressed with the result was more than disappointed with the televised portion.  Why were over forty blue shirts necessary in control?  If necessary, what were they monitoring?  Were they all engineers or were manufacturer reps there?  We saw NASA administrators in the back, but no mention of why they were there.  There was a 14 minute communications delay so were we watching the equivalent of Olympic TV delayed "real time"? Where was the coverage of key points?  For example, When was the parachute deployed and jettisoned?  What was the range of impact for a "safe" landing?  What would of happened had the crane cables not separated?  Would Curiosity vehicle been crushed or overturned?  How far away is the delivery crane?  Where was the followup and event closure.  Backslapping was deserved, after all that was apparent complete success after eight years planning and delivery, but there was no disipline that the room.  While the work was spectacular, the public presentation was a disaster, and that is why space is underfunded. Oh, and by the way, if you want engineers and scientists to be rock stars, tell the public what they do in a way that the viewer can understand AND want to emulate.  Where is the modern day Jules Bergman and his crew?

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Curiosity
Beth Stackpole   8/13/2012 8:08:32 AM
NO RATINGS
@nitpicker: I think this mission actually did a lot to showcase modern-day engineers and their work. There's a young guy central to this mission (I think I read he's been working at NASA for nine years) who's become an Internet sensation and the rock-star equivalent in the world of engineering and space exploration. They call him Mohawk Guy, but in real life, his name is Bobak Ferdowsi, a native of Oakland, CA, and graduate of MIT, who is a flight engineer on the Curiosity mission.

Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
It's been two years since the Mac Mini's last appearance on iFixit's teardown table, but a newly revised version joins Apple's lineup this week.
More often than not, with the purchase of a sports car comes the sacrifice of any sort of utility. In other words, you can forget about a large trunk, extra seats for the kids, and more importantly driving in snowy (or inclement) weather. But what if there was a vehicle that offered the best of both worlds; great handling and practicality?
Kevin Gautier of Formlabs describes the making of a carbon fiber mold for an intake manifold, using a $3,300 3D printer, during Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest.
Science fiction author Isaac Asimov may have the best rules for effective brainstorming and creativity. His never-before-published essay, "On Creativity," recently made it to the Web pages of MIT Technology Review.
Much has been made over the potentially dangerous flammability of lithium-ion batteries after major companies like Boeing, Sony, and Tesla have grappled with well-publicized battery fires. Researchers at Stanford University may have come up with a solution to this problem with a smart sensor for lithium-ion batteries that provides a warning if the battery is about to overheat or catch fire.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service