HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Feature
Materials & Assembly

Converting Machined Parts to Die Castings

NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 3 / 3
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Comparing processes
Dave Palmer   8/6/2012 12:31:33 PM
NO RATINGS
In most cases, casting a part versus machining it from bar stock is a no-brainer.  In my career, I've only come across one part that made more sense as a screw-machined part than as a die casting.  In that case, the geometry of the part made it extremely easy to screw machine.  Also, screw machining allowed the part to be made out of a much stronger wrought alloy.  It wound up being an 80% cost savings (from $4 to about 80¢), along with a more than 50% increase in strength.

But this is far from the norm, and as this article shows, casting is almost always much cheaper.  A more interesting comparison would be between die casting and powder metallurgy.  It would also be worthwhile to compare different casting processes (die casting, semi-solid processing, permanent mold, investment casting, lost foam, etc.).  In addition to cost, these processes also vary in terms of the mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy that can be achieved.

Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
Die Casting
Greg M. Jung   9/15/2012 3:36:50 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree that converting machined parts to die casting usually makes sense.  Because die casting tools can be expensive, it is important to first do a pay-back analysis and see if the volumes justify this change over.

In many cases we use both processes during the life of the product.  When the initial design is likely to change and we need to enter the market quickly, we may start with a machined part.  Then, as the design becomes stable and production volumes increase, we plan for a smooth cut-over to die cast tooling.

 

Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
In the wake of a fatal accident involving a Tesla Model S in autopilot mode, the auto industry may need to rethink the future of autonomous driving.
Pico Interactive is developing a stand-alone system, the Pico Neo, that it hopes will transform virtual reality into a more mobile and accessible experience.
A survey by Arena Solutions finds that half of all product companies do not use PLM. They manage their parts using Excel or nothing.
Modular approach simplifies assembly of demand-based, custom-configurable valve systems.
Wearable electronics may soon have another alternative to cumbersome batteries for power with the development of a new ultra-thin solar cell flexible enough to wrap around a pencil.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 11 - 15, Embedded System Design Techniques™ - Debugging Real-time Embedded Software – Hands on
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9 | 10


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service