HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Feature
Materials & Assembly

Converting Machined Parts to Die Castings

NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 3 Next >
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Comparing processes
Dave Palmer   8/6/2012 12:31:33 PM
NO RATINGS
In most cases, casting a part versus machining it from bar stock is a no-brainer.  In my career, I've only come across one part that made more sense as a screw-machined part than as a die casting.  In that case, the geometry of the part made it extremely easy to screw machine.  Also, screw machining allowed the part to be made out of a much stronger wrought alloy.  It wound up being an 80% cost savings (from $4 to about 80¢), along with a more than 50% increase in strength.

But this is far from the norm, and as this article shows, casting is almost always much cheaper.  A more interesting comparison would be between die casting and powder metallurgy.  It would also be worthwhile to compare different casting processes (die casting, semi-solid processing, permanent mold, investment casting, lost foam, etc.).  In addition to cost, these processes also vary in terms of the mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy that can be achieved.

Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
Die Casting
Greg M. Jung   9/15/2012 3:36:50 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree that converting machined parts to die casting usually makes sense.  Because die casting tools can be expensive, it is important to first do a pay-back analysis and see if the volumes justify this change over.

In many cases we use both processes during the life of the product.  When the initial design is likely to change and we need to enter the market quickly, we may start with a machined part.  Then, as the design becomes stable and production volumes increase, we plan for a smooth cut-over to die cast tooling.

 

Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
A Finland-based company has introduced what it claims is the first smart door lock that can be powered from energy harvested from a mobile device.
This charts show the pros and cons of five drive-train technologies.
A UK-based consortium comprised of the Centre for Process Innovation, Merck, and Polysolar are working on a design for integrated photovoltaic windows.
A new development kit expedites proof-of-concept for applications requiring an ultra-thin force or pressure sensor.
A researcher from The Ohio State University has designed objects that harness vibrations from the movement of swaying buildings or bridges to provide alternative energy.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 11 - 15, Designing ARM Devices Using Segger Tools
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service