HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
News
Electronics & Test

Could Toyota Engineers Have Anticipated Floor Mat Issues?

NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
Page 1/9  >  >>
Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Design for misuse a principle design tenent
Beth Stackpole   7/12/2012 8:30:49 AM
NO RATINGS
It's hard to say if Toyota's engineers skimped over a key piece of the development process with this particular example and I'm certain there's no way an engineering team can be expected to anticipate every possible failure given the practicalities and constraints of development cycles. That said, this example points up the very key requirement to do some level of design for misuse as part of the iterative process. It's one of those areas like design for assembly and disassembly that likely gets short shrift in a lot of companies and across myriad industries--not just automotive.

Bunter
User Rank
Platinum
Skeptical
Bunter   7/12/2012 9:42:54 AM
NO RATINGS
I've seen a few graphs presenting the rate of complaints on Toyota "unintended acceleration before and after it hit the media.

Their rates appear to have been typical of the industry overall beofre the media circus. After...well of course a lot of people who just made a mistake saw a way for someone else to take the blame.  And frankly in a panic situation very few people can accurately remember and assess what happened-it probably would not be tough to convince yourself it wasn't you.

IIRC the big splash case in the media, 4 dead in a Lexus ES, there were 3 floor mats stacked.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Design for misuse a principle design tenent
TJ McDermott   7/12/2012 10:06:10 AM
Just once, I'd like to see a judicial ruling tell the plaintive "YOU'RE AN IDIOT".  As in, "You're an idiot for stacking 8 pieces of carpet remnant in the floor of your car. Your claim is rejected; case dismissed."

There is never going to be a hard line defining misuse.  Putting another piece of carpet or a second mat on top of the first can probably be foreseen.  But is adding a second and third foreseeable?  Eight is not foreseeable.  Where is the dividing line?  It's going to be blurry for each and every design decision.

When will law require the user to take responsibility for his or her own actions?  Can the engineer be expected to plan for an idiot stacking eight mats?  Or even one that is too large for the footwell?  Or one that is sized perfectly, but does not have friction nits on the bottom?

If this is the route society expects engineers to take to make a design "safe", then maybe engineers should require a 100-page consent document which describes the conditions for use of the product we design?  Lawsuits can only proceed if you signed the document.

Jennifer Campbell
User Rank
Gold
Common sense
Jennifer Campbell   7/12/2012 10:10:55 AM
While I applaud Toyota for taking the step to announce this recall before an accident occurs, I can't help but wonder how necessary it actually is. If the floor mats in the cars are being made and installed correctly, why should they be responsible for the car owner's stupidity?

This is akin to the warning on the bottle of lemon dishwashing liquid - do not drink! Well, duh.

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Skeptical
NadineJ   7/12/2012 12:30:54 PM
NO RATINGS
I think Bunter says it best.  I'm skeptical too.  It is impossible for designers and engineers to anticipate every way consumers will use or modify a product.  This story, from the beginning, sounds more like user error.  Not to add to the conspiracy theories here but there's more going on than we all know.

Bunter-Can you share a link with the graphs you mentioned.  It sounds a lot like the research I've seen on alien encounters before and after the first Sci Fi movies.  Interesting how there were no little green men until after Hollywood put a face on them.

Bunter
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Skeptical
Bunter   7/12/2012 1:50:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for your kind words.  Been a while since I saw those graphs, they were on some auto websites at the height of the hysteria.

I do remember that Toy had very similar incidents per xxx number of cars with Ford and GM.  I also recall a long period graph of their UA complaints, little up a little down over many years, couple of humps and then it hit the news and it went up several orders of magnitude.

I recall my grandfather telling us, after he had ended up in the ditch on an icy road, how his car had accelerated after he hit the brakes.  I remember even as a kid thinking that sounded wrong.  Having since experienced loss of control on icy roads (Minnesota, duh) many times I realize that the sensation during the skid feels like things are happening very fast (Ooooooooooh noooooooo!).

Sensation is not physics.  Nor can we replay the tape of the event and see that we really hit the gas pedal and ran into the hedge.  So we believe that what we intended to do is what we did.

Cheerio,

Dennis

Bunter
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Common sense
Bunter   7/12/2012 1:53:12 PM
NO RATINGS
I think a short review of some of the absurd lawsuites that have won in court would explain this very well.  There is no reasoning so stupid that some jury will not accept it.

My thoughts anyway.

Take care.

Dennis

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Common sense
Rob Spiegel   7/12/2012 2:05:56 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm surprise Toyota would offer a recall for problems caused by owners. Wouldn't a letter to owners explaining that improper floor mats might cause problems be sufficient?

Jennifer Campbell
User Rank
Gold
Re: Common sense
Jennifer Campbell   7/12/2012 4:20:56 PM
NO RATINGS
I fully agree with you, Rob, though I think it's a good business practice for Toyota to offer the recall to try to "fix" anticipated problems caused by owners.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Common sense
Charles Murray   7/12/2012 10:03:49 PM
NO RATINGS
A letter would seem to be the sensible thing to do, doesn't it Rob? Unfortunately, this is apparently a legal matter, which doesn't always have sensible criteria.

Page 1/9  >  >>
Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The first photos made with a 3D-printed telescope are here and they're not as fuzzy as you might expect. A team from the University of Sheffield beat NASA to the goal. The photos of the Moon were made with a reflecting telescope that cost the research team 100 to make (about $161 US).
At Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest, Joe Wascow told Design News how Optimal Design prototyped a machine that captures the wing-beat of a duck.
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service