HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
News
Electronics & Test

Army's Rocket-Intercept System Hits the Mark

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/2
Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Hitting Targets = wishful thinking ?
Watashi   5/23/2012 10:17:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Not all applications require no collateral damage.  It can be handled operationally by implementing in an AO with clear fire zones.  As I staed in a previous post, CM is very unlikely for this class of target. 

More than likely adversaries would try to overwhelm the system to regain effectiveness.  This would require more of them to break cover and become targets themselves, which incidentally, is the biggest problem we have in low intensity conflict; identifying bad guys well enough to fit the ROEs.  When they finally meet criteria under the ROEs, they don't last very long.

ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
is tracking enough?
ChasChas   5/23/2012 11:01:04 AM
NO RATINGS
 

Intercept by tracking works best if the launch takes place from the target area. If these rockets are fired from a "safe" area, they will lose effectiveness. This means intercept can easily change to pursuit and that's whole new ballgame - and may add to enemy fire.

Of course, launching from the target area will surely increase the incentive to make a hit.

robatnorcross
User Rank
Gold
Re: What do these three things have in common?
robatnorcross   5/23/2012 3:48:37 PM
NO RATINGS
What they HAVE in common is exhibited precisely in the movie "BRAZIL".  Any one who reads Design News should be required to see the movie. I'm betting that most of the readers of this column don't know about "Brazil" the world's most accurate (and entertaining) predicition of the future.

It should be required viewing for all high school and college students.

bobjengr
User Rank
Platinum
HITTING A MISSLE WITH A MISSILE
bobjengr   5/23/2012 4:41:51 PM
NO RATINGS

I hate to be skeptical but hitting a missile with a missile is a daunting task----seeing is believing.  I worked in ballistic systems during my years in the Air Force and deployment speeds lead me to believe the reliability relative to "hits" would be considerably lower than would be tolerated.  Basically, show me a system and give me the hard data on the number of strikes.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Army's rocket intercept system
William K.   5/23/2012 6:10:02 PM
NO RATINGS
One interesting unmentioned fact is that if the system can track incoming well enough to hit them, it can also track well enough to locate the launch site and target it with "suitable response". The result is that an attempt to overwload the intercept system would certainly provide lots of return fire targeting information. One other detail is that the same intercepting system could also target incoming with directed energy weapons, which have a very good "hit" score Also, directed energy travels very fast.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Hitting Targets = wishful thinking ?
Charles Murray   5/23/2012 9:29:23 PM
NO RATINGS
good point, GlennA. I didn't notice the simulation reference at first glance.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: Army's rocket intercept system
GlennA   5/24/2012 8:35:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Wiliam K;  That is a very good point.  Optimization of that feature might even be a better route to go.  If one shot from a position was enough to have that position identified and destroyed by return fire (in less than a minute ?), who would dare to shoot first ?

<<  <  Page 2/2
Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Bigger than an iPhone 6 Plus, but smaller than an iPad Air 2. What am I? If you answered iPad Mini 3, you are correct.
Here are 10 robots that are designed to work effectively and safely with humans.
The data breaches at Target, Home Depot, and elsewhere have inadvertently highlighted a separate and unexpected problem: bad user interface design.
What if you could recharge your mobile device using the movements you make all day? That’s the promise of Ampy, a new device by a Chicago-based startup of the same name.
Peter Riendeau of Melexis shows how a time-of-flight sensor can be used for gesture recognition in a vehicle.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Nov 3 - 7, Engineering Principles behind Advanced User Interface Technologies
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service