HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
News
Design Hardware & Software

Johnson Controls Standardizes on Siemens PLM

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
Re: A little behind the times?
ChasChas   5/14/2012 3:22:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Did I read this right? They didn't even have 3D yet? Sounds like they were milking the old for all it was worth to show better short term numbers. Their engineers probably need to be rejuvinated as well. Sound like a big project.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little behind the times?
Beth Stackpole   5/14/2012 7:50:10 AM
NO RATINGS
It is always surprising to me, who has covered PLM and other enterprise software for years, how much adoption rates always lag behind what the industry perception is. Naperlou is right that implementation of PLM on an enterprise scale is a huge endeavor, not so much for the software implementation (although that's difficult), but for the huge organizational and process change it invokes. That's often why companies are slow to get on board. That and high cost, due mostly to associated consulting fees.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little behind the times?
Charles Murray   5/11/2012 6:58:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I, too, am a little surprised, Beth. The Detroit automakers are already very advanced in this area, and it would seem that the tier-one and tier-two suppliers have to move with the OEMs down a parallel path.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little behind the times?
Rob Spiegel   5/11/2012 4:47:45 PM
NO RATINGS

You're right, Naperlou, adoption can be painfully slow, and ERP is a good example. Plant software is another good example. Seems like the mandate for adoption doesn't come down until it becomes a competitive or cost imperative. My guess is that OEM customers prompted the action at Johnson Controls. 

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little behind the times?
naperlou   5/11/2012 9:59:27 AM
NO RATINGS
Beth, it is amazing, but it takes a long time for tools and techniques like PLM to become widely adopted.  It is like ERP, where many companies were not up to date until recently.  Finally, the high end corporate market is getting saturated.  In the software and systems development area CASE tools are still not as widely used as they should be.  I was working for a company in the early 1990s.  The statistics they quote about project failure rates and other indicators have not changed much since then.  And they have sold a lot. 

So, it is good to see PLM more widely used.  Effeciency improvement is what really drives wealth in a society. 

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little behind the times?
Rob Spiegel   5/11/2012 8:48:39 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, it is surprising Johnson controls was not further along in PLM, Beth. I think they finally got on board in part out of pressure from their OEM customers. At one point an automotive executive joked that our cars are fromt he space age now, but our seats are still from the 1970s. Since Johnson Controls is the largest seat maker, the company's adoption of PLM may begin to changed that.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
A little behind the times?
Beth Stackpole   5/11/2012 7:22:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Nice customer win for Siemens. I'm actually surprised such a major automotive OEM supplier was not further down the pike in implementing PLM. PLM, while still not as widely understood in some manufacturing sectors, is pretty well entrenched in the automotive and aerospace markets and in use at most of the major automotive OEMs. Interesting that the Vistagy folks seem to be the driver on this deal. Vistagy, a maker of tools for composite design, was recently acquired by Siemens. Perhaps the need for a tool for effective material composition was the final straw that drove Johnson to pull the trigger on a move to implement PLM on an enterprise scale.

Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Former DARPA official and Google executive Dr. Kaigham Gabriel believes sensor companies think too much like suppliers and need to bring their products closer to the consumer.
One way to keep a Formula One racing team moving at breakneck speed in the pit and at the test facility is to bring CAD drawings of the racing vehicle’s parts down to the test facility and even out to the track.
Most of us would just as soon step on a cockroach rather than study it, but that’s just what researchers at UC Berkeley did in the pursuit of building small, nimble robots suitable for disaster-recovery and search-and-rescue missions.
Engineers at Festo were inspired by how a caterpillar builds its cocoon when designing its new 3D Cocooner printer.
Design engineers need to prepare for a future in which their electronic products will use not just one or two, but possibly many user interfaces that involve touch, vision, gestures, and even eye movements.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course June 28-30:
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service