NASA researchers are planning to put the engines of a C-17 cargo transport plane on a diet of cereal and crayons as part of a series of tests of new health diagnostic sensors that they hope will become an early warning system for potential engine failure.
The space agency says its Aviation Safety Program is working on new engine diagnostic technology that will identify early symptoms of glitches in jet engines, including changes in vibration, speed, temperature, and emissions. The goal of the new sensors is to help ground crew and jet mechanics identify potential problems sooner and repair them before they threaten the safety of pilots, crew, and passengers.
Technicians prepare a US Air Force C-17 for engine health monitoring tests as part of the Vehicle Integrated Propulsion Research program -- a collaboration by NASA, the Air Force, and Pratt & Whitney to create a sensor system for early diagnosis of engine problems. (Source: NASA)
The new sensor system is being designed and developed as part of the Vehicle Integrated Propulsion Research (VIPR) program, a joint project of NASA, the Air Force, and Pratt & Whitney, the company that developed the C-17 engines. A number of engine health sensors are being tested as part of the project, including a model-based performance estimation and diagnostics system; an emissions sensor system to monitor the output of carbon, oxygen, and other gases; a self-diagnostic accelerometer; and high-frequency vibration sensors. Other sensors are tracking the effects of foreign materials on legacy instrumentation, including an inlet debris monitoring system and high-fidelity fuel flow measurement.
Engineers are putting the sensors through a series of ground tests at NASA's Dryden Air Flight Research Center using the engines of a retired C-17 on loan from the Air Force. The first test, conducted in December, activated the sensors on one of the C-17's two turbofan engines and ran water through it to see how the sensors would react. In a second test scheduled for early next year, the plane's engines will suck up crayons and cereal to monitor the ability to detect small bits of debris. The cereal and crayons will leave a colorful trail of grains and wax that the researchers can see and study to gauge how well the sensors work.
Following that, a final test on the system will introduce hard, glass-like particles that will simulate volcanic ash, which is too small for the eye to see. NASA says researchers will evaluate how early the sensors and related software can detect the particles and report a problem.
In fact, volcanic ash is one of the reasons for interest in developing a diagnostic sensor system. In 2009, an ash cloud from the Eyjafjallajökull volcano eruption in Iceland caused major air travel disruptions. Airlines would not fly through the cloud, because of the potential damage to jet engines, and they were forced to cancel an unprecedented number of flights. NASA says researchers are trying to determine the effects of ash early on to avoid such issues in the future.
The Air Force has conducted tests in the past on the effects of ash on jet engines, but this is the first time sensors are being used as part of that testing.
TJ, what is interesting along those lines is that there have not been such sensors employed until now. Sensors will give us a better picture of what the restrictions should be. That and the detection of the clouds and their composition should allow a more fine grained safety zone definition.
When you are going 500-600MPH, by the time the sensor has anything useful to tell you, the Engine has already suffered damage. These sensors would be more useful to help schedule maintainance of the Engines (e.g. knowing when the Engine has suffered enough cumulative wear and tear to need an overhaul).
Radar or Lidar mapping of the area in front of the plane seems much more useful for volcanic damage avoidance. It would let the pilot know that they need to climb or descend to avoid the cloud of debris. Even better, would be satellite mapping of areas or routes to avoid (just like weather, but tuned to detect airborne volcanic debris).
Water or snow entering the engine can be quite impressive. One night (way way back) I was in an airport tower and saw one of the big planes land on a runway that had a light dusting of snow. The explosion out the back of the engine was distressing (at least to me). Not seeing anyone even notice, I asked what had just happened, and they told me that it was a compressor stall from snow sucked up into the engine. Apparently it happens all the time.
This article was very interesting. The choice of materials used as stated in the article: "The cereal and crayons will leave a colorful trail of grains and wax that the researchers can see and study to gauge how well the sensors work." It kind of a "blood splatter pattern" for detecting the efficiency of the sensors. Quite clever if you ask me!
I wonder if some of the latest radar technologies (millimeter wave, synthetic aperture) could be tweaked in effort to discern the density and spread of ash clouds.
BA flight 9 on June 24, 1982 demonstrated the very real danger; all four engines flamed out after encountering an ash cloud.
This seems like testing for minimum safe exposure to a heavy metal poison. I'd just as soon avoid it completely.
I like the idea of ever better engine damage detection. But there should be some attention paid to detecting hazards such as ash clouds from a distance, to better quantify the reach of the cloud. Instead of shutting down air travel over the entire continent, a much more narrow exlusion zone can be defined to minimize travel disruption while still completely avoiding the cloud.
Rob, I also remember when a lot of those flights were cancelled because of the volcano. I believe one of the big trade shows in Europe lost thousands of attendees because of it. I would imagine that some of the big carriers also lost money as a result of it.
Thanks for writing about this. It's good to see that warning systems for engines are being put into place. Like Beth, I also wonder why these particular materials were used--cereal and crayons. And when it comes to flying, I can't imagine what "over-caution" would mean.
Well, I'm impressed. I remember when all of those flights to and from Europe were cancelled. It's nice to see that someone is looking into improving our ability to detect the volcanic glass -- and thus probably avoid it. I know the flight folks were criticized from over-caution. With the sensors, the airlines will be able to determine whether there is actual danger or not.
Given the recent incidents not only with volanic ash, but planes getting into trouble hitting flocks of birds, this kind of testing is critical. Interesting choice of materials to test with. Any backstory on why cereal and crayons to simulate debris that a plane might encounter mid air?
Andrew Morris designed a circuit that could detect a stroke victim's groan and convert the sound into a signal so caregivers would know when help was needed.
New disc magnet motors fit into the design trend of stepping up to closed loop performance while maintaining the cost advantage of stepper motor technology.
At the Design News webinar on June 27, learn all about aluminum extrusion: designing the right shape so it costs the least, is simplest to manufacture, and best fits the application's structural requirements.
On April 21, NASA launched a novel project, putting into orbit three satellites that employ an off-the-shelf commercial smartphone as the control system.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 5
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This radio show will show what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
0 
