HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
News
Materials & Assembly

Military Designs Artillery Shells With Reactive Materials

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/2  >  >>
Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
What type of materials?
Ann R. Thryft   7/6/2012 12:30:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Elizabeth, what types of materials are these? The article says they're a new class, but does that mean metals, plastics, composites, nanocomposites, or something else?

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Reactive material artillery shells.
Ann R. Thryft   5/9/2012 4:48:59 PM
NO RATINGS

I think William raised a good point. If these artillery shells are 5x more lethal, does that mean 5x the explosive force? Whatever the percentage or factor, it's greater explosive force which means they're likely to be more dangerous to store, as well as to deploy.


William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Reactive material artillery shells.
William K.   5/8/2012 10:35:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I would be concerned about the stability of the materials under various conditions. Unstable ordinance just sounds like it would be really unpleasant. The reason for this concern is that it seems to me that materials that are able to explode would be a bit more reactive, and thus less likely to be completely stable. But perhaps there is another answer.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Are non-military apps possible?
Ann R. Thryft   5/8/2012 12:24:20 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree about the emotional response--that's why I prefer "x times" to "x%."

ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
Less weight to haul into battle
ChasChas   5/8/2012 10:56:32 AM
NO RATINGS
http://www.designnews.com/document.asp?doc_id=243309&cid=NL_Newsletters+-+DN+Daily

Like the Ironman Ammo Carrier (above), it should ease the burden of material needed to wage war.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: More effective
Mydesign   5/8/2012 5:08:13 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Jhankwitz, you are right. Every year government is spending billion of USD for military R&D inorder to strengthen the national security and weapon systems. I think the same technology can also be use for common peoples benefit also. For example, the light weight materials using in space craft can be used for making artificial limbs etc.

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Are non-military apps possible?
NadineJ   5/7/2012 11:50:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Ann.  I understand the math.  I was just making an observation about the emotional response to "500 percent more lethal". 

Mining work is a possibility but, as you mentioned, I don't see any advantage over current technology for that particular industry.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Are non-military apps possible?
Charles Murray   5/7/2012 6:12:30 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Ann. I can't imagine any non-military applications for this. It's designed, not just to explode, but to wreac havoc when it does.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Are non-military apps possible?
Ann R. Thryft   5/7/2012 4:08:52 PM
NO RATINGS
500 percent more lethal just means 5x more lethal. Although that's a lot, considering the fragments will release both kinetic and chemical energy. The only non-military use I can imagine is for the other apps of explosives, such as mining work, although I don't see what chemical energy will bring to that effort. It would be interesting to know what chemicals are involved.

jhankwitz
User Rank
Platinum
Re: More effective
jhankwitz   5/7/2012 11:31:16 AM
It's unfortunate that the results of this research will be limited to military applications.  It would be nice if it could spill over into non-military applications.

Page 1/2  >  >>
Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
If you’ve noticed the recent news about electric cars and batteries, then it’s easy to wonder about the continuing wisdom behind public subsidies for EVs.
A slew of announcements about new materials and design concepts for transportation have come out of several trade shows focusing on plastics, aircraft interiors, heavy trucks, and automotive engineering. A few more announcements have come independent of any trade shows, maybe just because it's spring.
A group of collaborators wants to recast MacGyver or a show similar to it with a female protagonist as part “The Next MacGyver” competition, in order to get young girls interested in STEM fields.
Biomimicry and 3D printing have come together in new swarming ant and butterfly robots that act very much like their insect counterparts, the inventions of German robotics firm Festo.
Samsung's Galaxy line of smartphones used to fare quite well in the repairability department, but last year's flagship S5 model took a tumble, scoring a meh-inducing 5/10. Will the newly redesigned S6 lead us back into star-studded territory, or will we sink further into the depths of a repairability black hole?
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 20 - 24, Taking the Internet of Things to the Cloud
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service