Recent camera product introductions are highlighting the importance of machine vision in aerospace manufacturing. At the Vision 2011 conference in Stuttgart, Germany, Microscan demonstrated its Vision MINI and Vision HAWK smart cameras.
The small size of both makes them useful for a wide range of identification and inspection applications, including the meticulous lot tracking and component traceability required in aircraft assembly. The MINI measures 1.80in x 2.10in x 1.00in, and the HAWK measures 1.59in x 2.27in x 3.79in. Other recent introductions include the Imperx 29-megapixel ICL-B6620, a very high-resolution camera measuring 2.36in x 2.36in x 1.77in.
Inspection in aerospace manufacturing sometimes requires very small, very high-resolution video cameras,
such as this 60 x 60 x 45mm, 29-megapixel B6620 camera from Imperx.
Photo courtesy of Imperx
High quality and precision are top requirements in the components and processes used in automated assembly lines for aerospace manufacturing. Aircraft manufacturers are required to mark each component that goes into an airplane assembly with a 2D code and track it throughout the process. Their manufacturing facilities need machine vision not only for inspection, but also for automated tracking, tracing, and control of a wide range of part and assembly sizes and shapes.
These separate but interrelated functions help ensure quality, precision, accuracy, and traceability. Individual components, component lots, and assemblies must be tracked and traced, often over long periods of time, and problems must be easily and quickly identified, located, and isolated in order to be controlled.
A complex production environment requires a system for tracking the real-time location of sub-components, components, and sub-assemblies at any given point in the manufacturing process. Next is a system for tracing where they were before that given time and what processes were done to them there. This can provide a lifecycle history of the items. The third element is a system for determining and controlling where parts will go next in the process, based on whether they meet the quality criteria to continue to the next step. All three of these systems can be merged into a single machine vision-assisted system, which can optionally perform inspections.
In aerospace, the steps in this overall vision-enabled tracking, tracing, and control system are sometimes identified as part identification or recognition, part acceptance or rejection, part request or handoff, deformation detection, and gap and flush measurement. For part identification, parameter tolerance data must be input, such as location, width, height, depth, and diameter. To accept or reject a part, the features of a scanned part must be compared to their predefined parameters. Components that pass the parameter test will be handed off to another station for assembly. To do this correctly, other features of the part -- usually CAD dimensions -- must be compared to those of the requesting station to ensure that it's the right one for the job.
In deformation detection, things such as impact damage or corrosion in panels, rotor blades, or other components are detected by measuring the planarity or curvature of a surface. Those measurements are compared to tolerances for the particular component, and the extent to which it is out of plane or out of curvature is noted. Finally, gap and flush measurement is used to make sure mating assemblies will connect properly, such as mating dashboards to window frames, seats to interior cockpit frames, or doors to door frames.
Given the need to track and trace assemblies during aerospace manufacturing, wouldn't RFID or some sort of sensor system be a better fit for this kind of application rather than what I imagine are costly machine vision cameras? Or is the camera necessarily for easily and quickly identifying problems or quality issues?
RFID is quite complex and not inexpensive to implement. It also doesn't provide much except location information, and certainly not the inspection type data that vision provides. If you also needed inspection data, that would mean implementing two systems, one with RFID and one with vision, and then trying to integrate the incompatible data between the two. That would be a lot more expensive.
Moreover, with vision you can capture a huge amount of data about products and components almost instantly. In this aerospace example, the data codes used are not unlike the standard data matrix codes used in electronics. These are essentially barcodes on steroids, and the infrastructure is well in place for attaching, reading and tracking them, in electronics, and in aerospace.
As usual, much depends on the particular application.
It's been a few years since I was in this industry, but I would have to think that the cost of the imager (<$10K ?) is less than the cost of individually tagging each item. E.g., we used vision to verify proper auto assembly ("the BOM for this VIN indicates cruise control should be included; cruise control requires a number of parts, can cameras 'see' those parts?") An aircraft BOM has about 1M parts; it would be problematic to RFID each one, and are the parts still functional after the RFID has been applied?
Also, as you imply, the vision system can check for positional and quality concerns.
hillbepa, I agree. The imager cost--which can be well under $10K these days depending on all the variables--is usually less than the cost of an RFID system, and it can do a whole lot more. In smaller plants with simpler parts inventories, this seems to be an overriding factor. But in larger factories, or even in businesses with unusual track and trace needs, such as the Blue C Sushi kaiten sushi restaurant--no kidding, see link below--RFID can deliver what a particular company needs.
You are ight about the costs, hillbepa. The vision system becomes simply a fixed cost that can be amortized over multiple parts and sold systems - the same as the RFID reader. However, the tags are a cost that keeps on giving. As Ann pointed out, unless the application is such that individual tracking (or post-sale tracking) is vital, this system would be much more cost effective in the long run.
As energy efficiency becomes more and more a concern for makers of electronics devices, researchers are coming up with new ways to harvest energy from sound vibration, footsteps, and even electromagnetic fields in the air.
The government wants to study your brain, and DARPA wants to use similar information to give robots true autonomy beyond any artificial intelligence developed to date. Sound like science fiction? It's not.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 3
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
A quick look into the merger of two powerhouse 3D printing OEMs and the new leader in rapid prototyping solutions, Stratasys. The industrial revolution is now led by 3D printing and engineers are given the opportunity to fully maximize their design capabilities, reduce their time-to-market and functionally test prototypes cheaper, faster and easier. Bruce Bradshaw, Director of Marketing in North America, will explore the large product offering and variety of materials that will help CAD designers articulate their product design with actual, physical prototypes. This broadcast will dive deep into technical information including application specific stories from real world customers and their experiences with 3D printing. 3D Printing is
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
3 
