HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
Feature
Electronics & Test

U.S. News Names Best Engineering Schools

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
jmiller
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No real surprises
jmiller   9/26/2011 11:04:58 PM
NO RATINGS
I am curious why the rankings don't take into account any of this shift into account.  If some schools are moving to more hands on and this is desireable then shouldn't the rankings reflect this.  Of course, that would imply that the rankings have some sort of meaning.  Nothing against MIT or any of the other fine schools on the list.  But quite often the best school is the one that allows the individual to thrive, grow and learn.  And for some that might not be the biggest with the best name, but a smaller school with more one on one instruction.  Non the less, it does make for good coffee table talk.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No real surprises
Dave Palmer   10/10/2011 12:44:11 PM
NO RATINGS
You don't really expect U.S. News and World Report to admit that you may be better off getting a job for hands-on knowledge and going to a community college for your first two years of school, do you?

If more people did this, it might exert some downward pressure on tuition for 4-year universities.  Then the 4-year universities might not have as much money to advertise in the pages of magazines like U.S. News and World Report.

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Re: No real surprises
Alexander Wolfe   11/17/2011 10:42:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting study just realized shows what we all knew, that engineering is the toughest major. Also interesting to note that engineering students do way more work than business majors -- their future bosses. Take a look, here.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No real surprises
Dave Palmer   11/17/2011 11:33:31 AM
NO RATINGS
I don't think anyone could possibly be surprised by the fact that students in engineering and physical sciences study more than business students.  This is why there are t-shirts which say "lim(Engineering)GPA-->0 = Business".

I was struck by this passage in the New York Times article: "transfer students [...] were more likely to work off campus and care for dependents, decreasing their sense of connection to the college community."

This describes my college experience pretty well.  But as more people get wise to the fact that transferring into a four-year school from a two-year school makes good economic sense as well as academic sense, I think that transfer students will become less of an invisible minority on campus.




Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: No real surprises
Charles Murray   11/17/2011 10:09:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Regarding the New York Times story: It's not surprising to me that engineering majors study more than business majors. What is shocking to me, however, is the fact that the hours-per-week numbers are 19 to 14. Undergrad business majors study 14 hours per week? My anecdotal experience with the business majors who I knew in college would indicate that the hours of business study are much lower than that. Also, I seem to recall that engineering professors would tell us we need to study "three hours outside of class for every hour in the classroom."

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Re: No real surprises
Alexander Wolfe   11/18/2011 10:31:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Re business majors, I could see MBA students having to put in engineering-type hours, especially when doing case studies. OTOH, with undergrads, I agree with you -- it doesn't ring true that their study hours are the same order of magnitude as those of engineering majors. Another interesting point in the study was that engineering seniors have too much course work to hold down after-school jobs.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No real surprises
Dave Palmer   11/18/2011 1:42:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, the business majors may be engaging in some creative accounting practices when they say they study 14 hours a week outside of class.

As far as engineering seniors not being able to balance a full time job with their studies, I don't know whether it's generally true for everyone, but I decided to go from working full-time to working part-time during my last semester as an undergrad.  Up until that semester, I was able to balance working full time and studying full time.  But I decided that for the last semester, my focus needed to be on school.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Not fun
Charles Murray   11/18/2011 5:55:10 PM
NO RATINGS
It's always interesting to look at the "student happiness" list in The Princeton Review's annual ratings. Engineering schools dominate the bottom (unhappiest) schools. The amazing part of that is that the only schools on the list that can be recognized as engineering institutions are those that specialize in engineering (MIT, Cal Tech, Georgia Tech, Illinois Institute of Technology, New Jersey Institute of Technology, etc). In other words, schools like Purdue and the University of Michigan don't count as engineering schools. Nevertheless, the few schools that could be called "engineering schools" all collect at the bottom. There can be only one reason for that: Getting an engineering degree isn't fun. The only fun part is when you graduate and get a load of job offers.  

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Shameless Plug
Alexander Wolfe   11/23/2011 8:12:45 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm going to make a plug for my alma mater, Cooper Union, which is number four on the second list (engineering schools where highest degree is bachelor's or master's).  Sadly, though, Cooper is in the process of considering changing its century old full-scholarship (free tuition) policy. (See "Cooper Union Looks at Charging Tuition." One can't help but wonder if this will effect its future place on such lists. If students have to pay $40k per year to go there, will it still be able to attract the same high-quality student body? I'll have more to say on this in an upcoming blog. If you have any opinions, please send them to me at alex.wolfe@ubm.com

 

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No real surprises
Nancy Golden   3/7/2012 4:31:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I think some of this is our tendency to keep to certain educational traditions. Engineering curriculum has a certain rigor to it that is simply not for the faint of heart. This may be off topic but it always puzzled me that in order to enter a doctoral program in theology, one must obtain a master of divinity which is a  90 hours program - not for the faint of heart either. Why so many hours? Is that another tradition?

I can see the 14 hours being reasonable for a business major - that's two hours a day and theoretically they have projects to do, case studies ect. I would expect a full time engineering student to be putting in more...I remember burning the candle at both ends many times.

<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Today's robots should be respected, and humans should be wary of their growing skills and sophistication. Quite simply, robots are better than us in a lot of ways. Here are 10 of them.
3D printing has met up with drones in a 3D-printed UAV. University of Sheffield engineers printed the prototype drone in 24 hours from ABS plastic using Fused Deposition Modeling.
Product design is changing with advances in technology and outsourced manufacturing. The Art of Product Design spells out the future of design engineering.
AMD is set to launch the industry's first 16 GB workstation graphics card -- the W9100.
Samsung's 5th-generation Android-based Galaxy smartphone includes a fingerprint scanner, updated camera and display, and water/dust resistance.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service