HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
Feature
Mechatronics

Is 'Engineer Programmer' An Oxymoron?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Threaded|Newest First|Oldest First
Timmmy49
User Rank
Iron
Engineering Programmer
Timmmy49   7/7/2011 7:45:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I think that the colleges should teach and use engineering programming more in the classes. The biggest pet peeve of mine in college is how is what we are using applied to real world situations. I write my own code for the most part until it comes to something that give me a problem. Then I turn it over to the engineer programmer to solve my problem.

notarboca
User Rank
Gold
Re: Engineering Programmer
notarboca   4/23/2012 12:40:53 PM
NO RATINGS
My college experience was that you were either a hardware engineer or a software engineer, with some overlap of course.  It definitely paid to know as much as possible of the "other world".

gsmith120
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Engineering Programmer
gsmith120   4/30/2012 9:04:44 PM
NO RATINGS
When I attended college it had an EE department and a CS but not they are considered the same department.  Oddly enough a lot of my EE friends now write software code.  I write firmware (VHDL) but not software.

JamesCAnder
User Rank
Iron
Re: Engineering Programmer
JamesCAnder   9/27/2012 3:54:39 PM
NO RATINGS
It is an odd case.

In the job market you are expected to be able to code on a variety of platforms.

In college today, most EE students do not learn much past a beginner JAVA class.

Luckily for me I had to make it through the full gauntlet of programming courses. From Assembly, C, C++, Matlab, to JAVA, and on a wide array of processors, I knew more than I needed. Later in my career, my programming experience was a vital part of my day to day.

 

I'd say the "Engineer Programmer" is a correlative, an apt description of the EE today.

 

JCA 

warren@fourward.com
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Engineering Programmer
warren@fourward.com   3/20/2013 8:04:25 PM
NO RATINGS
In one way I always thought I was born too early- I should have been in WWII instead of a baby boomer.

In other ways I was born too late.  When I went through engineering we only had Fortran on IBM punch cards.  I am an analog engineer.  I love the nuts and bolts of designing analog and digital circuits.  I love the challenge of making a new circuit work where there was nothing before.

However, I think I would have been really excited about combining software and hardware- maybe an embedded engineer!  But the training for software just wasn't available.  About 15 years ago I took a coarse in C++.  I really loved it.  But I think the time for me learning these new skills is probably over.  But I bet it would have been a lot of fun!

I envy the new generation of engineer who learns both!

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Engineering Programmer
tekochip   3/21/2013 1:43:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Fortran IV on punched cards run by the main frame, that was my first language too.  Just being able to hit the "delete" key instead of typing a whole card over again was a major innovation in engineering throughput.

BobGroh
User Rank
Platinum
Engineer ... Programmer? The answer is 'It Depends!'
BobGroh   7/14/2011 4:44:29 PM
NO RATINGS
This response has a huge danger of becoming way toooo long but I will try to condense my thoughts on this subject.  First of all, engineering design and software programming are NOT the same or even that close.  Both have unique training and experience needs AND they both require somewhat different types of personal characteristics.  Yes, an engineer should be able to program a computer (that also means a uP).  But most engineers do NOT make good programmers - the skill set is just too different.  And likewise, good programmers do NOT make good engineers for the same reason.

But there are times when each (programmer and design engineer) need to intrude a bit into the other guy's world and certainly each should know enough to be able to do so, i.e. to at least understand a bit of the other guy's mystery world.

Given all of the above, there are obviously folks who can do both jobs superbly well. But for the average person, not so much.

Another thought - certainly an engineer has many tools that do require some level of computer expertise (e.g. using Matlab for simulation, using Labview for testing prototypes, using Excel for data analysis) and certainly the competent engineer should have a fair ability to use all of these.

And sometimes a design engineer has no choice - the project team is too darned small and he or she needs to be a 'jack of all trades'.  Kind of fun but I'll bet the certain facets of the project suffer (e.g. the software part for an embedded uP).

Just one last thought (I promise!) - I think that a college education should provide exposure to everything that an engineer will require to be a good and successful engineer when he or she gets out into the REAL world. That does mean exposure to software programming techniques (yes, Virginia, there are both BAD and GOOD software techniques and procedures!)

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Engineer ... Programmer? The answer is 'It Depends!'
Nancy Golden   3/1/2012 11:09:03 PM

I think you make some excellent points, Bob. On the lighter side, I solved the problem by marrying a handsome M.S.E.E.  hardware guy. I am a test engineer with a basic working knowledge in hardware but where I shine is in software. Hubby knows some software but can run circles around me in hardware and circuit design. We make a great team although when anything goes wrong with the project we all know to blame the hardware ;)

Ivan Kirkpatrick
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Engineer ... Programmer? The answer is 'It Depends!'
Ivan Kirkpatrick   3/15/2012 8:13:36 PM
NO RATINGS
I have been a Software Engineer for the past 18 years while my original degree and work was in Mechanical Engineering. 

I have enough experience to realize that most Engineers should not be designing large complex software systems.  Just becuase you can write a program in Java  to solve some engineering calculations does not mean you are qualified to deisgn a complex control system.

It helps to have a good generalized ability and to also know when to get help.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Firmware Engineers
tekochip   4/23/2012 3:46:55 PM
NO RATINGS
The article didn't really examine the blurry line of the EE. When microcontrollers became cheap enough to use in designs I slowly became what we now call a Firmware Engineer. Frequently we just call the Firmware Engineer a Software Engineer and in some companies the engineer is a CS major rather than a EE. I've hired both CS and EEs over the years, but I do prefer EEs that learned how to write code, rather than a CS major that knows how to solder. It seems that the troubleshooting skills of a EE are much better than the CS major. The code writing EE is a blurry line between the hardware and software world. Another reason to call it Firmware.


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administrationís recent backup camera mandate could open the door to more vehicle innovations, including better graphical displays, 360-degree camera views, and the increased use of Ethernet.
With support from National Instruments, a group of dedicated students from Connally High School in Austin, where more than 50% of the students are at risk of not graduating, have created a successful robotics team that is competing in the FIRST World Championships.
Solar Impulse 2 -- a 100% solar-powered airplane -- has been completed. It features several advanced materials, some developed specifically for next year's attempted around-the-world flight.
Sherlock Ohms highlights stories told by engineers who have used their deductive reasoning and technical prowess to troubleshoot and solve the most perplexing engineering mysteries.
Lumus and eyeSight have partnered to create consumer-grade devices that offer all the prime functions of smart glasses without the bulk.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service