A patent recently issued to a major motor company has apparently created quite a stir among some of its competitors, who are scurrying to check for examples of prior art (previous inventions or designs). Though there appears to be nothing earth-shaking in the patent, clearly there is some dimension of it that troubles other motor makers. The simple answer is that there's a lot at stake here. Motors are a huge business, and companies may simply be scrambling to cover their bases. On the other hand, it's also true that patents increasingly have become a focus of competitive effort, proliferating in number and forcing companies to be more cautious about how they interpret them. That's particularly true in the motion control industry, where there are several examples of vigorous defense of patents. Most recently: Animatics' heavily publicized lawsuit against QuickSilver Controls for infringement against its patent for an integrated dc servo motor and controller. In January. The court ruled in favor of Animatics.
Producing high-quality end-production metal parts with additive manufacturing for applications like aerospace and medical requires very tightly controlled processes and materials. New standards and guidelines for machines and processes, materials, and printed parts are underway from bodies such as ASTM International.
Engineers at the University of San Diego’s Jacobs School of Engineering have designed biobatteries on commercial tattoo paper, with an anode and cathode screen-printed on and modified to harvest energy from lactate in a person’s sweat.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.