Toughest frame in GM's history
If you are in the vicinity of a Chevy or GMC dealer, check out the
undercarriage of the new Silverado or Sierra pickups. GM engineers claim that
the '99-model vehicles have the toughest, most intelligently built light-duty
truck frame in the company's history. And that's saying a lot, since the
venerable Chevy C/K and Sierra pickups, introduced in 1988, had a frame that set
a new industry benchmark, according to automotive experts.
"Not only is the new frame stiffer and more durable, but it also enabled us
to make other improvements from ride and handling to body fit and finish," says
Ken Sohocki, chief engineer of GM's new full-size truck platform.
To bring it off, GM's frame engineers applied a modular, three-section
strategy to the new pickups' construction. It allows the front, mid, and rear
sections to be made independently by combining materials and processes that not
only meet or exceed performance requirements, but don't impact overall vehicle
mass targets.
The design starts with the front-frame rails. Here, the engineers employed
new hydroforming technology (see diagram) for producing the rail and engine
cross members. With the hydroforming process, the rails start as hollow, round
steel tubes bent to general form. High-pressure fluid then forms the tube to
just the right shape--from the inside out--while the ends are compressed.
|
|
Hydroforming, roll-form/draw-bending, and traditional stamping
processes converge in the design of a three-component pickup frame that GM
calls the most intelligently built frame in the company’s
history. |
Hydroforming offers several advantages over conventional boxed-frame
technology, say the engineers. They include:
Eliminating about 300 inches of weld from the front section for increased
structural rigidity and frame strength, producing more consistent steel-wall
thickness during forming.
The new mid-frame section comes in four lengths to accommodate two wheelbases
and two cab styles. It also transfers loads to the front axles and supports such
components as the fuel tank, brake lines, and wiring harnesses.
The roll-form/draw-bending process for producing the frame uses a solid,
straight piece of lightweight, high-strength steel. It rolls the steel gradually
into a lipped C-shape, forming the frame without the need for a more traditional
stamping procedure. This allows the steel to retain strength without increasing
its mass. Added strength is achieved by rolling over the edges of the frame to
reinforce it. In fact, the design increases the mid-rail's properties 65% over
its predecessor, while reducing its total mass 27%.
The third part of the modular frame, the rear C-section, mounts suspension
components, bolts the pickup box, and hangs the spare tire carrier, bumper, and
trailer hitch. Weight-carrying requirements of this section are minimal,
therefore, the engineers elected to use a more traditional steel stamping
technology to create this section.
|
|
Four-step hydroforming process employed in GM’s modular frame design
eliminated more than 40 lbs of steel, while improving dimensional control
of mounting brackets. Frame absorbs about 35%more energy than a box
frame. |
To round out the new full-size pickup frame design, the engineers turned to
tubular cross members and close-out plates. These components provide enhanced
torsional performance over traditional stamping, without driving beaming
stiffness into an undesirable range. Welded construction eliminates the need for
rivets in many areas.
As a final improvement, the engineers specified the use of a new,
high-temperature wax application to better protect the frame from corrosion.
With a melting point of 295F, the hot-wax treatment is reportedly 55 degrees
higher than that used on the Ford F-150 and GM's 1998 full-size pickups.
Magna International's Cosma Body & Chassis Systems' Formet frame
manufacturing facility (St. Thomas, Ontario, Canada) produces and assembles the
three-component frames. Automated guided vehicles deliver the stacked frames
directly to railcars, where they are shipped JIT to three GM assembly plants.
"Vehicle build time has been reduced because the frame arrives at the final
assembly plant in a more finished condition," observes GM's Sohocki. "This
design has created a solid foundation for our new full-size pickups, and, at the
same time, demonstrated GM's role as an industry leader."
Micro-arcs form ultra-hard aluminum
An electrolytic surface conversion and coating process developed by Almag Al
Ltd. (Jerusalem, Israel) seems certain to challenge such established aluminum
finishing systems as plasma coating, hard-coat anodizing, and hard-chrome
plating in the near future. Named the Almag Process, the system resembles
anodizing--it takes place in an electrolytic bath and is energized by electric
power--but the similarity ends there.
For example, the batch is silicon-based, rather than an acid solution, and
the power source is ac rather than dc. Moreover, the electrical charge is
applied by a specific waveform.
In the process, racked workpieces go into a bath held at 95F (35C) and 800V
ac is applied. In the first few seconds, a thin layer of aluminum hydroxide
forms on the workpiece surface.
Activated by multiple dielectric breakdowns on the aluminum hydroxide layer,
a series of "micro-arcs" is generated at the surface to form a ceramic layer.
The layer extends to the smallest, most remote cavities in such applications as
a fine screw thread or piping.
This complex physical/chemical reaction results in a hybrid aluminum
hydroxide/silicon oxide ceramic coating. In about 40 minutes, a 50-micron
coating forms. This, Almag's Patrick Elbeze says, proves sufficient for most
industrial applications.
What sets the Almag process apart from similar processes, Elbeze notes, is
the hardness and abrasion resistance of the newly formed surface. Measured using
the Vickers system, hardness falls in the 3,200 range. That puts the coating in
the same hardness class as sapphire. Wear resistance measures about four times
that of hard anodized aluminum, according to Elbeze. 
|
Almag aluminum coating process employs a silicon-based bath instead of
an acid solution, and uses an ac rather than dc power
source. |
The process also strengthens thin aluminum sections. An aluminum wire
measuring 1-mm thick, protected with 100 microns of Almag coating, takes on the
stiffness of steel wire of equivalent diameter. Treated aluminum parts can
operate at temperatures up to 662F (350C), imparting thermal and electrical
insulation to the material. Dielectric strength measures more than 20V per
micron of coating thickness, while the electrical resistance of a 100-micron
coating approaches 100 M{OMEGA} or greater.
"Our coating stubbornly resists attack by seawater, oils, acids, and alkali,"
says Elbeze. "It even shrugs off salt spray exposure for 1,000 hours or more."
Polish the coated surface to a mirror finish and you achieve a very low
coefficient of friction. You may not even need a lubricant in bearing
applications, Elbeze says. Impregnating the surface with a tough, slippery
polymer or lacquer, which fills in the crystalline interstices, further
decreases friction.
Omega Metal Laboratories conducted independent tests on the coating (see
table). The results show that an Almag-process aluminum part tests out at 4.4
times the abrasion resistance of hard-anodized aluminum, 2.7 times that of
tempered steel, and twice that of hard-chrome-plated aluminum.
"Our process is 10 times better than plasma-coated aluminum at roughly the
same processing cost," Elbeze says. "What's more, our processing equipment costs
one-quarter that of plasma equipment."
A basic Almag unit sells for $120,000. Currently, the machines are made in
France by Acore, a producer of generators and electrical specialties. Acore has
signed an agreement with Robert Moos, a Frenchman who has established Almag
France, to distribute the equipment throughout Europe.
"We estimate that during the next six years, Almag coating will capture 50%
of the ceramic plasma coating market," predicts Elbeze. This works out to about
$5 billion for coated aluminum parts and $3 billion for steel parts replaced by
the Almag process.
|
ALMAG VS THE COMPETITION
|
|
|
METHOD
|
ALMAG AL COATING
|
HARD CHROME
|
PLASMA COATING
|
HARD ANODIZATION
|
|
PROPERTIES
|
|
|
|
|
| Hardness (Vickers
method) |
2,000
|
1,200
|
1,500
|
800
|
| Resistance to
erosion |
4.5
|
2
|
0.1
|
1
|
| Friction coefficient
|
0.06
|
0.11
|
0.2
|
0.09
|
| Adhesion |
1
|
0.5
|
0.1
|
0.8
|
| Resistance to heat
in C (for 3 seconds) |
1,250
|
900
|
1,250
|
400
|
Electric insulation
(100 microns) |
6,000V
|
0
|
0
|
600V
|
| Rigidity |
1
|
0.5
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
| Corrosion (coating +
impregnation) |
10
|
0.1
|
0
|
1
|
| Ecology/
contamination level |
Non-contaminant |
Very
high |
High
|
High
|
|
Table compares
Almag coating process to conventional methods in the coating of
aluminum.
|