Instead of manufacturing ICs on flat chips, why not use silicon spheres as a
substrate? The result of this manufacturing paradigm shift would be
manufacturing high-performance, low-cost devices in five days with a fab that
costs only $100 million. Such agile, just-in-time manufacturing plants could
respond to customer demand quickly and rapidly implement new technologies.
Keeping up with Moore's Law. Today, each new generation of integrated
circuits provides more functionality, at less cost, than the previous
generation. To keep up this cost/performance dynamic, semiconductor
manufacturers have typically placed more functions on a single chip. Moore's
Law, Gordon Moore's 1965 axiom on microchip performance, stated that chips
double in capacity every 18 months.
As chips increase in complexity, the processes used to create them undergo a
corresponding complexity increase. The industry is approaching technical limits
on the number of circuits that can be placed in a given area without generating
unacceptable electrical interference between the circuits.
Because chips are typically produced in wafer lots, one way to increase
productivity and lower the cost per chip, while allowing chip sizes to increase,
is to increase the diameter of the wafer. For this reason, the semiconductor
industry, which only recently moved from 150- to 200-mm wafers, is now moving to
300-mm (12-inch) wafers. A 300-mm wafer yields more than double the number of
chips of a 200-mm wafer.
Moving to larger wafer sizes, while imperative from a productivity
standpoint, will antiquate existing manufacturing technologies and facilities.
Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International (SEMI), an industry group
comprising makers of chip-manufacturing equipment, estimates that the transition
to 12-inch wafers will cost equipment makers and materials suppliers more than
$21 billion.
The process for creating flat, rectangular integrated circuits today accounts
for more than $1.5 billion in manufacturing assets. Because of the strict
requirements for ultra-pure air and water in the fabrication process, and the
precision equipment required to construct millions of circuits in a
fingernail-sized space, wafer fabrication facilities cost about $1 billion to
design, construct, and equip.
|
|
If silicon wafers were replaced with 1-mm balls, then manufacturing
fabs could shrink accordingly. All fabrication steps could be carried out
in ultra-clean tubing, and the processed balls would transfer from one
process to the next under normal atmospheric pressure
conditions. |
Wafers produced by this process typically have many defects. These defects
can be attributed to the difficulty inherent in having a single, highly pure
crystal survive the cutting, grinding, and cleaning processes, as well as
impurities associated with the containers used in forming the crystals.
The large capital outlays and short product life cycles characteristic of
today's industry act as a huge barrier to innovation. Inventors with innovative
algorithms, or new functions, but not endowed with several hundred million
dollars to invest in capital, must rely on silicon foundries to bring their
ideas to the marketplace.
Spheres in motion. BALL Semiconductor is leading a revolution in the
semiconductor industry with a simple idea: a 1-mm spherical semiconductor in
place of today's flat, rectangular chip. This technology will enable the
production of spherical semiconductors in a single, enclosed process. Using a
manufacturing line of small tubes and pipes, ball semiconductors will be
manufactured in a single process using proven technologies of gases, chemical
reactions, and solid-state physics of semiconductor manufacturing.
This process begins with the sorting of very small polycrystal granules that
have been processed into single-crystal silicon balls. Initially, the company
will attempt to produce 1-mm single-crystal balls; but we also intend to develop
the capability to produce smaller balls. We anticipate that the balls will be in
constant motion as they are continuously processed, treated, and transported at
high speed through hermetically sealed pipes and tubes during various processes
for the crystal-growing, grinding, and polishing steps and then for the repeated
cleaning, drying, diffusion, film deposition, wet and dry etching, coating, and
exposing steps of the integrated-circuit manufacturing process. The spheres are
exposed to air only in photolithography; thus, there is no need for the
traditional--and expensive--clean room. BALL Semiconductor's vision is to make
semiconductors on 1-mm spheres, and then decrease 0.8 mm in diameter, 0.5, 0.1,
and smaller.
System integration. The ball approach to system integration could have
revolutionary impact on the semiconductor industry.
The current approach to system integration calls for placing more and more
functions on one chip. This approach requires enormous capital infusions every
few years for new processes and equipment to accommodate more complex systems on
a chip and larger wafer sizes. The ball approach is to produce spheres with
different functions in a uniform process, and then cluster the spheres needed to
build a system. Instead of chips becoming larger, wafers becoming larger,
processes becoming more complex, and equipment becoming more expensive, ball
semiconductors offer the potential of equipment and process stability across
several generations of technology.
Chips vs. spheres
|
CHARACTERISTICS
|
CHIPS
|
SPHERES
|
Manufacturing complexity
|
Three semi-automated processes (create, process,
and package wafers)
|
One fully automated process
|
Production flexibility
|
Batch processing
|
Single-unit processing
|
Wafer fabrication
|
Clean room
|
Clean tubes and pipes
|
Surface area for inscribing circuits
|
Limited (area of 1-mm chip=1 sq mm)
|
Two to three times more (area of 1-mm sphere=3.14
sq mm)
|
System integration
|
More functions on larger chip
|
Cluster smaller balls with different functionality
|
Processing temperature
|
Must be below 1,400C
|
Can exceed 2,000C
|
Shipment to customers
|
Plastic or ceramic packaging
|
No packaging required
|
Cycle time, original silicon to final
assembly
|
120 to 180 days
|
5 days
|
Cost per function
|
Higher
|
Approximately 10% for comparable function
|
Ease of innovation
|
Only highest volume designs are produced; high
processing cost limits innovation
|
Lower processing cost means more designs can be
converted to silicon
|
Energy consumption
|
Higher
|
Lower
|
Original silicon material shipped as final product
|
10 to 20%
|
90 to 95%
|
Environmental impact
|
Detrimental
|
Significantly lower impact
|
|
Manufacturing circuits on silicon spheres--as opposed to
silicon wafers--requires only one automated process and takes five days
from original silicon to final assembly.
|