I keep hearing about CFL and LED. What’s the difference between these types of light technology and the classic incandescent bulb? Which is the best?

Of course, in today’s world, we are all being encouraged to discard those ancient incandescent bulbs for the new compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) and light emitting diodes (LED), which for most of us seem really expensive to buy. I admit that I never really liked the traditional tube fluorescent lights, probably because first, I always have trouble getting the bulbs in - it seems that I always have them out of alignment and second, I usually buy cheap lights that have ballasts that go bad. But I must admit, now that I’ve started using the screw in CFLs (like the one pictured), I’ve had quite a change of heart. I’ve yet to take the plunge into the world of LEDs however, primarily because I haven’t yet been able to justify the expense. And for me, they always seem to look blue. Nonetheless, I know that someday I will make the switch as they all will become clear with the obligatory advancement of technology.Recently I set out to compare our friends, the CFL and the classic incandescent. The following two tables illustrate the characteristics for a range of incandescent bulbs from 25 watts to 200 watts and a range of CFLs from 5 to 40 watts. Assuming you turned on each light and left it on for a full year, how much would it cost, including bulb replacement and electricity?
|
Incandescent (5,000 hour life) |
|||||
|
Watts |
Lumens |
Lm/Watt |
Cost |
Cost/yr |
$/Lm-yr |
|
25 |
150 |
6.00 |
$0.55 |
$23.96 |
$0.1597 |
|
40 |
280 |
7.00 |
$0.55 |
$37.76 |
$0.1348 |
|
60 |
520 |
8.67 |
$0.55 |
$56.15 |
$0.1080 |
|
75 |
700 |
9.33 |
$0.55 |
$69.95 |
$0.0999 |
|
100 |
950 |
9.50 |
$0.55 |
$92.94 |
$0.0978 |
|
150 |
1750 |
11.67 |
$1.75 |
$141.04 |
$0.0806 |
|
200 |
2400 |
12.00 |
$2.40 |
$188.16 |
$0.0784 |
|
CFL (10,000 hour life) |
|||||
|
Watts |
Lumens |
Lm/Watt |
Cost |
Cost/yr |
$/Lm-yr |
|
5 |
300 |
60.00 |
$3.00 |
$7.23 |
$0.0241 |
|
10 |
600 |
60.00 |
$3.00 |
$11.83 |
$0.0197 |
|
15 |
900 |
60.00 |
$3.50 |
$16.86 |
$0.0187 |
|
20 |
1350 |
67.50 |
$4.00 |
$21.90 |
$0.0162 |
|
25 |
1800 |
72.00 |
$4.50 |
$26.94 |
$0.0150 |
|
30 |
2000 |
66.67 |
$5.00 |
$31.97 |
$0.0160 |
|
40 |
2700 |
67.50 |
$9.00 |
$44.68 |
$0.0165 |
As you can see, the lumens per watt increases as wattage increases for both types of bulbs. In addition, notice that the lumens per watt or luminous efficacy value is 6 to 8 times greater for CFLs than their incandescent brethren and they last twice as long. As such, even though a CFL costs 5 to 6 times more than an incandescent bulb in the store, the loaded cost per year of a CFL is still about 20% of an equivalent incandescent.
Of course that looks good on paper (or on a screen), but what does it mean in real life? In 2008 my house had about 90 incandescent lights totaling 6750 watts. At a 6% duty cycle, I used a total of 3,544 kWh on lights at a cost of about $373 (don’t ask me how I know this - just accept the fact that we engineers like data). Anyway, these 6,750 watts put out about 61,875 lumens. Using the equivalent light in CFLs, I figure I would need only about 955 watts of CFLs to get the same light. At the same duty cycle this would be only 501 kWh at a cost of $53 - an annual savings of $320. Note that replacing all 90 bulbs at $3 each would cost only $270. I think I had better get started.
robots42 commented:
One thing these calculations overlook is that generally we heat our houses, especially at the times we have the lights on, and if we don't heat them with incandescent bulbs we have to use other means so the indicated savings are actually meaningless and wilfully misleading.
JC commented:
I found a site that backs up the information on this site and also gives an actual comparison between CFL lights and LED lights. Here is the site: ezdiyelectricity.com/?p=519
TD commented:
Follow-up: I bought a Sylvania 3W led MR16 bulb (12V) at a Menard's store, last week. Impressive amount of light, much better than the PAR20 with 3 leds. The bulb cost $16. Very useful for task lighting and pinspot on artwork, etc. Businesses such as restaurants and galleries (where lighting use is abundant and constant) could benefit greatly greatly with reduced energy cost. CAVEAT: use magnetic transformers, not electronic.
GuyWhoReads commented:
I have not had as much luck with the CFLs. Even trying to buy the same brand, I find inconsistencies in how long they last. What replacement rate was assumed in the above cost analysis and how was it derived (hopefully not just based on the labels' brags of 7 year life - I have yet to see that).
MD commented:
One issue that we have is the disposal of the CFL after it fails. My understanding is CFL's contain trace ammounts of metals (mercury,etc) making them hazardous to dispose of in normal trash. There are limited ways for the common public to dispose of CFL's in a safe manner. It would be easier for me to accept the CFL if there was a simple and easily available method to dispose of them so I don't feel i'm harming the environment. When I ask others how they dispose of CFL's, the answer is always "I just throw them in the trash". There needs to be a common infrastructure across the country for disposing of and reclaiming the materials inside the CFL bulbs.
Ed commented:
As commented, LED's will have as good or better efficiencies as CFL's but with lifetimes of 2X and more. However, the major advantages are there is better durability (shock or shatter resistant), they have instant on capability (don't have to wait for them to get to full intensity), and they aren't as much of a hazard because they lack the mercury of CFL's. The disadvantages are the cost (3 to 10x), which should come down in time, and the availability right now (still don't see too many std bulb equivalents although they are coming on big time with Christmas type lights).
mnc commented:
I have replaced my most frequently used bulbs with CFL. The major difficulty is the delay in coming up to full brightness. One room in our home is so dark that I needed to put back half of the incandescents in order to have a comfortable light level while the CFL bulbs warm up.
Jacob commented:
the title is misleading. You don't compare LEDs vs. CFL, you compare CFL vs conventional incandescents. Thanks for wasting my time with a misleading title.
Karim commented:
Can somebody also share there knowledge on the even density of lighting and the ease of control specially in area where this is critical?
Thank you,
Tom W commented:
The power savings in changing the bulbs is significant. If you live in an area where it is hot, remember all that waste heat must be removed. Also consider savings in your air conditioner electric bill.
TD commented:
A brand-name 120Lm LED bulb costs ~$30usd at a home-improvement store. It has similar Lm/W efficiency as a CFL (3W). It cost 10X the cost of a similar output CFL, but should last 2X longer. Next year, lifetime cost should be closer to CFL, if prices drop like CFL prices have.
Chris commented:
Very nice straight forward comparison; I would love to see LED's compared as well (maybe I just need to read a few more blog entries to get to the comparison). I know the color temp on the new CFL’s and LED’s is much higher than traditional bulbs… how does this translate to actual radiated heat?
In a new addition on our house we have found that we actually can heat the addition just with the use of the computer equipment and the lights in the room. This is in a newly built addition on our house in Northern New England. Of course in the summer we have to pay to cool the room from all those heat sources…
Joel Young commented:
The average for my electric bills in 2008 was $0.105
Ron commented:
Very good analysis. Whats the unit cost of a Kwh in your area?
Sponsored Content
Design News Partner Zones
Light Matters: The Unsung Heroes of
Modern Health Care
First, let's define "no-compromise." In an ideal configuration, this lamp would use a high-brightness LED (HBLED) that is built into a small, integrated package and is able to produce a large quantity of focused light, operate with a high level of reliability and generate no audible noise. Is this difficult? Yes, but it is possible.
Read More
Design Engineers' Portal for Sensing and Machine Safety
Whatever industry you're in, or whatever product you manufacture, the right sensors to automate your plant, and to improve your overall efficiency, quality and safety are a must. You'll find Banner Engineering to be an amazing resource of products, training and people with expertise.
Test & Measurement World Machine Vision & Inspection Report
Topics include machine-vision software, Power over Camera Link, thermal imaging and frame grabbers. Read More















