Mediocrity in the Design Process: Marinara sauce gone wrong.
An end user should not be using a mediocre product, and let me explain how marinara sauce relates.
Before super-mega-markets, I would imagine markets had fewer varieties of many products. Those products were likely produced to try to please as many customers’ taste buds as possible. Let me presume that customers only had different preferences between texture and spice of sauces. The two axioms below represent the design space and two functional requirements for each user and the product placement is depicted by the sauce jar, relative to the consumer desire on the two-dimensions.

As depicted above, a product that tries to serve all end users isn’t very effective at capturing much of a market – it’s mediocre for most customers.
The neutrally spicy and neutrally textured marinara sauce doesn’t appeal to anyone who prefers a sauce that is any single characteristic of smooth, chunky, spicy or plain. It’s a tragedy of compromise.
Instead, differentiating the pasta sauce into specific varieties provides many more customers a reason to purchase a marinara sauce variety that fits them well. For figurative purposes, the graphic below shows a sampling of varieties you might find on a store shelf today.

An ideal goal of a design is for everyone to have a product that fits them perfectly, but it’s obviously impossible to reach this.
Pasta sauce aside, back to technology and mechatronics..
A conical example of a technology design choice initially gone wrong: the all-in-one printer-fax-scanner-copier. It took years to master the design, and mediocrity was the main theme of the device for a long time after its introduction. No single function worked well, and often the machines didn’t work at all.
A recent trend I’ve seen are so-called do-it-all robots. One module-based robot from Louisiana State University looks promising, but I don’t think I’d want a single robot that tends my yard, cleans my toilet, and detects intruders. First, I’d rather have a robot that does one of these well. More on this mechatronic design in a future post.
A product time line often starts as a widely-targeted (mediocre) product and slowly adapts to specialized user-centric product designs. This may simply be the nature of adoption in a market, but many technologies have had large growing pains during their proper specialization. Computers evolved from a few consumer types, to many diversified types. I predict the next big diversification will occur in robotics, once a niche for robotics booms, it can be exploited to fund further specialties.
My questions to you: Why are conveniences often introduced as all-in-one and do-it-all devices?
test commented:
test
ken commented:
you don\’t understand the product.
The product IS convenience. Any idiot can follow a good recipe and make really good (to them) sauce. However, most folks are willing to PAY for the CONVENIENCE of buying something that, while maybe not the best, is acceptable, as long as it is convenient. Convenience is simply a higher priority to that person.
Again, convenience is the product.
If I want the BEST printer, the BEST scanner, the BEST fax, i\’ll probably not be willing to compromise on any of them them.
However if I want something that is acceptable AND DOESN\’T TAKE UP SO MUCH SPACE, an all-in-one is for me. The space issue is the product i\’m buying.
Besides, your robot analogy is off. These aren\’t built as mass-marketed products, they\’re still in the technology-demonstation category. And in this case demonstrating flexibility in that technology is more key than demonstrating fastidiousness in one technology like potty cleaning.
Flexibility is the product.
Stefan Wolpert commented:
Good question.
I believe that feature-laden products will contain compromises that may detract from the system.
Limited resources will always exist: space, cost, power, time, intellectual input, and so on. Doing more things often means that each feature/component won\’t receive as many resources compared to if it were a stand-alone device.
John Dodge commented:
Question back at you: do you believe all-in-one products are ultimately compromises, thus watering down the marinara?
Sponsored Content
Design News Partner Zones
Light Matters: The Unsung Heroes of
Modern Health Care
First, let's define "no-compromise." In an ideal configuration, this lamp would use a high-brightness LED (HBLED) that is built into a small, integrated package and is able to produce a large quantity of focused light, operate with a high level of reliability and generate no audible noise. Is this difficult? Yes, but it is possible.
Read More
Design Engineers' Portal for Sensing and Machine Safety
Whatever industry you're in, or whatever product you manufacture, the right sensors to automate your plant, and to improve your overall efficiency, quality and safety are a must. You'll find Banner Engineering to be an amazing resource of products, training and people with expertise.
Test & Measurement World Machine Vision & Inspection Report
Topics include machine-vision software, Power over Camera Link, thermal imaging and frame grabbers. Read More















