Einstein, the independent thinker; 3M and innovation

Einstein's Nemesis: DI Herculis Apsidal motion solution
It is not about just throwing relativity theory but throwing relativity theory with NASA Astrophysicists Attached to it.
Abstract: This is the Solution to the "quarter of a century" motion puzzle that Einstein and all other 100,000 space-time physicists and Astrophysicists could not solve by space-time physics or any other said or published physics including 109 years of Noble Prize winner physics and 400 years of Astro-physics and dedicated to Dr Edward Guinan and Dr Frank Maloney of Villanova University who posted this motion puzzle in 1985 as not solvable by space-time physics and in "Apparent" inconsistency with General relativity theory and started the binary stars collections with motion that can not be explained by space-time physics or any said or published physics. This motion puzzle is posted on Smithsonian-NASA website SAO/NASA.
Introduction Time is not a structure like space- to scientifically accept space- to imaginary time - back to space jumping continuum told by Einstein and taught by MIT Harvard Cal-Tech Stanford NASA and all other space-time physics departments regardless what the 100,000 Space-time Physicists have/had said about it because space-time physics is not good enough to solve the simplest problem in physics introduced here and solved.
Universal Mechanics Solution:
For 350 years Physicists Astronomers and Mathematicians missed Kepler's time dependent equation introduced here and transformed Newton's equation into a time dependent Newton's equation and together these two equations explain Quantum - Relativistic effects; it combines classical mechanics and quantum mechanics into one mechanics and explains "relativistic" effects as the difference between time dependent measurements and time independent measurements of moving objects and in practice it amounts to "Visual" effects.
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
In polar coordinates system
r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)
F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r (1)

= [d²(m r)/dt² - (m r)θ'²]r(1) + (1/mr)[d(m²r²θ')/d t]θ(1) = [-GmM/r²]r(1)
Proof:
r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)
r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ; r(1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)
d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ(1)
γ = d [r' r(1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t = r" r(1) + r' d[r(1)]/d t + r' θ' r(1) + r θ" r(1) +r θ' d[θ(1)]/d t
γ = (r" - rθ'²) r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ(1)
d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)
And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)
(2) : d(m²r²θ')/d t = 0 m²r²θ' = [m²(θ,0)φ²(0,t)][ r²(θ,0)ψ²(0,t)][θ'(θ, t)]
= [m² (θ, t)] [r² (θ, t)] [θ' (θ, t)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= [m² (θ, 0)] h (θ, 0); h (θ, 0) = [r² (θ, 0)] [θ'(θ, 0)]
= H (0, 0) = m² (0, 0) h (0, 0)
= m² (0, 0) r² (0, 0) θ'(0, 0)
m = m (θ, 0) φ (0, t) = m (θ, 0) Exp [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] t; Exp = Exponential
φ (0, t) = Exp [ λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)]t

r = r(θ,0) ψ(0, t) = r(θ,0) Exp [λ(r) + ì ω(r)]t
ψ(0, t) = Exp [λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]t
θ'(θ, t) = {H(0, 0)/[m²(θ,0) r(θ,0)]}Exp{-2{[λ(m) + λ(r)]t + ì [ω(m) + ω(r)]t}} ------I
Kepler's time dependent equation that Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians missed for 350 years that is going to demolish Einstein's space-jail of time
θ'(0,t) = θ'(0,0) Exp{-2{[λ(m) + λ(r)]t + ỉ[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}}
(1): d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² = -Gm³M/m²r²
d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -Gm³ (θ, 0) φ³ (0, t) M/ (m²r²)
Let m r =1/u
d (m r)/d t = -u'/u² = -(1/u²)(θ')d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²)d u/d θ = -H d u/d θ
d²(m r)/dt² = -Hθ'd²u/dθ² = - Hu²[d²u/dθ²]
-Hu² [d²u/dθ²] -(1/u)(Hu²)² = -Gm³(θ,0)φ³(0,t)Mu²
[d²u/ dθ²] + u = Gm³(θ,0)φ³(0,t)M/H²
t = 0; φ³ (0, 0) = 1
u = Gm³(θ,0)M/H² + A cosine θ =Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)/h²(θ,0)
And m r = 1/u = 1/[Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)/h(θ,0) + A cosine θ]
= [h²/Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)]/{1 + [Ah²/Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)][cosine θ]}
= [h²/Gm (θ, 0) M (θ, 0)]/ (1 + ε cosine θ)
Then m r = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] m (θ, 0)
Also, r (θ, 0) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] m r = m (θ, t) r (θ, t)
= m(θ,0)φ(0,t)r(θ,0)ψ(0,t)
Then, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] {Exp [λ(r) + ω(r)] t} ------------------ II

This is Newton's time dependent Equation
If λ (m) ≈ 0 fixed mass and λ(r) ≈ 0 fixed orbit; then
θ'(0,t) = θ'(0,0) Exp{-2ì[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}
r(θ, t) = r(θ,0) r(0,t) = [a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)] Exp[i ω (r)t]
m = m(θ,0) Exp[i ω(m)t] = m(0,0) Exp [ỉ ω(m) t] ; m(0,0)
θ'(0,t) = θ'(0, 0) Exp {-2ì[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}
θ'(0,0)=h(0,0)/r²(0,0)=2πab/Ta²(1-ε)²

= 2πa² [√ (1-ε²)]/T a² (1-ε) ²; θ'(0, 0) = 2π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²
θ'(0,t) = {2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²}Exp{-2[ω(m) + ω(r)]t
θ'(0,t) = {2π[√(1-ε²)]/(1-ε)²}{cosine 2[ω(m) + ω(r)]t - ỉ sin 2[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}
θ'(0,t) = θ'(0,0) {1- 2sin² [ω(m) + ω(r)]t - ỉ 2isin [ω(m) + ω(r)]t cosine [ω(m) + ω(r)]t}
θ'(0,t) = θ'(0,0){1 - 2[sin ω(m)t cosine ω(r)t + cosine ω(m) sin ω(r) t]²}
- 2ỉ θ'(0, 0) sin [ω (m) + ω(r)] t cosine [ω (m) + ω(r)] t
Δ θ (0, t) = Real Δ θ (0, t) + Imaginary Δ θ (0.t)
Real Δ θ (0, t) = θ'(0, 0) {1 - 2[sin ω (m) t cosine ω(r) t + cosine ω (m) t sin ω(r) t]²}
W (observed) = Real Δ θ (0, t) - θ'(0, 0)
= - 2 θ'(0, 0) {(v°/c) √ [1-(v*/c) ²] + (v*/c) √ [1- (v°/c) ²]} ²
With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity; v°/c = sin ω (m)t; v*/c = cosine ω (r) t
And, v°/c

E=mc²/2
2009 is the end of Einstein's space-jail of time and Fraud symbol E=mc²
Joenahhas1958@yahoo.com
Time is not a structure like space to allow space-to time-back to space jumping claimed by Physicists regardless of what physicists have to say about it because Physics is a business and not necessarily science or scientific and like every business it comes with fraud and fraud is Einstein's space-time (x, y, z, it) continuum that led to fraud symbol E=mc² and yes I am saying that 109 years of Nobel prize winners physics and physicists are all wrong and space-time physics is based on scientific fraud. When "results" expected and "No" discovery, Physicists rigged Physics for grant money since the start of the industrial revolution. Physics today is at least 51 % fraud!
r ------------------>>Exp (ì w t) ---------->> S=r Exp (ì wt) Nahhas' Equation
Orbit-------->> Orbit light sensing------>> Visual Orbit; Exp = Exponential
Particle ---->> light sensing of moving objects------------ >> Wave
Newton--------->>light sensing---------->> Quantum
Quantum = Newton x Visual Effects
Quantum - Newton = Relativistic = Optical Illusions
E (Energy by definition) = mv²/2 = mc²/2; if v = c
m = mass; v= speed; c= light speed; w= angular velocity; t= time
S = r Exp (ì w t) = r [cos (wt) + ì sin (wt)] Visual effects
P = visual velocity = change of visual location
P = d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì w r Exp (ì w t)
= (v + ì w r) Exp (ì w t) = v (1 + ì) Exp (ì w t) = visual speed; v = wr
E (visual energy= what you see in lab) = m p²/2; replace v by p in E = mv²/2
= m p²/2 = m v²/2 (1 + ì) ² Exp (2ì wt)
= mv²/2 (2ì) [cosine (2wt) + ì sine (2wt)]
=ì mv² [1 - 2 sine² (wt) + 2 ì sine (wt) cosine (wt)];v = speed; c = light speed
wt = π/2
E (visual) = ìmv² (1 - 2 + 0)
E (visual) = -ì mc² ≡ mc² (absolute value;-ì = negative complex unit) If v = c
w t = π/4
E (visual) = imv² [1-1 +ỉ] =-mc²; v = c
wt =-π/4+ỉln2/2; 2ỉ wt=-ỉπ/2 - ln2
Exp (2i wt) = Exp [-ỉπ/2] Exp [l n (1/2)] = [-ỉ (1/2)]
E (visual) = imv² (-ỉ/2) =1/2mc² v = c
Conclusion: E = mc² is the visual Illusion of E = mc²/2 joenahhas1958@yahoo.com. All rights reserved.
PS: In case of E=mc² claims to be rest energy claims then
E=1/2m (m v + m' r) ² = (1/2m) (m' r) ²; v = 0
E = (1/2m) (mc) ²; m' r =mc
E=mc²/2

wa.html">Pierce college puyallup

In the early 2000's, the significant investment in R&D at 3M was not delivering a solid flow of new products. This was the pattern well before McNerney entered the picture. There is no doubt that Six Sigma did increase efficiency and eliminated excessive spending in mant areas. Perhaps it did also have a negative impact on creativity. Let's hope that Buckley's more 'free wheeling' approach paysoff with stronger growth based on a solid flow of new products. He has spent a lot of time 'bad mouthing' the previous administration for 3M's growth problems. It is now time for him to show whether he can deliver on his commitments.

The author of the Business Week article poses a dilemma between efficiency and creativity at 3M and casts Six Sigma as a killer of innovation. The real issue is leadership and how a CEO of an company like 3M can lead creativity AND efficiency together. The inefficient prima dona in lala land is no more effective or capable than the uncreative super master black belt. But get the two working together and great things can happen. Check out the article entitled "How Successful Leaders Think" in the June issue of Harvard Business Review for an in depth review on qualities of effective leadership.

Finally some reality to burst the six sigma bubble. lets hope the 'belt' qualification can disappear from job advertisements so business improvement can become creative and customer focus again. Thanks for raising a point about six sigma which most line operators