Top header wildcard
Electronics Industry Search
Already a member? Log In
New to the site? Register

ADVERTISEMENT

I Have The Power!

Welcome to the alternative energy and sustainable power blog written by an engineer for engineers! Here we cover alternative energy and fuel technologies buzzing through the media including solar, wind, fuel cells, hydro, nuclear, ethanol, natural gas, hydrogen, bio-diesel, and more. Topics in conservation, sustainable development, and distributed generation will also be covered as will emerging energy technologies including nuclear fusion, nanotechnology, and bio-power systems.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Thursday, February 1, 2007

Fuel Cell Optimists Get Called Out

Feb 1 2007 10:53PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (1) |
Blog This! using: Blogger.com | LiveJournal |

Since November 2006, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) has been publishing a series of short articles in the ASHRAE Journal on fuel cells for distributed generation. These articles are being churned out by engineers at Cambridge, MA based TIAX, LLC, a company focused on rapidly evolving new innovations into commercial technologies.

TIAX has a good reputation for creative problem solving. So, as I read these articles, I expected to be greeted by novel TIAX solutions for the many problems still plaguing fuel cells. Instead, I got the latest incarnation of the same overly-rosy rhetoric that conveniently overlooks all the problems that have kept fuel cells on the fringes of the commercial market for the past 15 years.

These articles broadly describe how fuel cells could fit into a distributed generation (DG) paradigm. DG is the production of electrons via many small generators distributed throughout the power network. Ideally, generators are in close proximity to the point of electron consumption, minimizing transmission distance. DG topography is juxtaposed against our conventional centralized power network where electrons are produced at large, remote power plants and transmitted long distances to their point of use.

Distributed generation is synergistic with alternative energy because most renewable power sources are small in output and amenable to DG distribution topology. For example, electrons generated from a residential solar array are best utilized in that home, minimizing transmission loss penalty.

So far, the ASHRAE articles have covered proton exchange membrane (PEM), solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC), and phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFC). The take-home message seems to be there is a fuel cell fit for every application. PEM is ideal for remote hydrogen production; SOFCs will be the workhorse generators for distributed combined heat and power (CHP), and PAFCs will provide low-emission electrons using dirty fuel or when waste heat is not needed.

I wonder if there is a fuel cell out there that will do my dishes.

Completely missing from the ASHRAE articles are any discussions of cost, fuel quality, or implementation. What is our motivation to switch to fuel cells when conventional energy technologies are still less expensive? How are we planning to scrub impurities out of fuels to prevent electrolyte poisoning? Where is the justification for scrapping trillions in capital invested in the grid (and how do we appease those with vested interest in those assets) in favor of this magical fuel-cell-fired DG system?

Methinks TIAX and ASHRAE need to go back to the drawing board. You have to work a little harder than that to wow this blogger!

Related entries in: Design News | Electronics/Test | 




at 2/5/2007 1:27:02 PM, Patrick said:
I should begin by noting I am one of the authors listed in ASHRAE article regarding PEM cells. I should further note that what follows is merely my opinion, separate from my co-authors, TIAX, or ASHRAE. Regarding the PEM article specificially, I think a certain amount of perspective should be maintained. In the nominally 2-2.5 pages of text, it is unreasonable to expect in-depth discussions on some of the important issues the author of this blog identifies (costs, scrubbing, capital investments, etc). However, there is recognition and discussion of the cost premium associated with PEM cells and their required ultra-pure H2 sources. In fact, the article identifies several industries that would be potential first adopters based on their willingness to pay a price premium for clean, remote power. The issue of fuel scrubbing is, of course, linked to the cost of the fuel. While fuel cell manufacturers are developing more robust catalysts, they are also striving for longer stack life. This is keeping fuel purity requirements high, but producing significantly better cell life/performance than has been seen in the past. The last point specifically made by the author of this blog is the existing infrastructure of traditional power generation. As noted in the PEM article, 70% of the cost of generating power is directly attributed to fuel costs. This means that while significant captial expenditures may have been made to date, they are dwarfed by the total fuel costs over the life of the plant. Add some estimate of proposed carbon taxes on plant emissions and it may become economical, on the 20-30 year plant life timescale, to consider replacing older and less efficient plants with DG or renewables based systems.

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:



ADVERTISEMENT