ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in 10 seconds.
Electronics Industry Search

Polling Question

Should the government bail out U.S. automakers?

  • Yes
  • No



View Previous Poll Results
Advertisement

Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (6)

New CAFE MPG rules for automakers rule

August 14, 2007

"You’re either at the table or on the menu," Dave McCurdy was quoted as saying recently in the Wall Street Journal. If that’s the case, Detroit’s automakers are on the menu when it comes to miles per gallon. 

McCurdy heads up the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers which vigorously opposes federal legislation to raise average miles per gallon to 35 by 2020 under the 32-year-old CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) guidelines. In opposition to the higher CAFE guideliness, the AAM represents the big three automakers in Detroit and Toyota. Current CAFE standards are 27.5 MPG for cars and 22.2 MPG for light trucks.       

The issue will be debated in both Congressional chambers this Fall and already a somewhat watered-down version has gained some support in the House. The 35 MPG figure has carried in the Senate. 

The hue and cry from the automakers has been predictable. They claim CAFE standards will bring down American auto companies. I think they have been doing a pretty good job of that themselves. If we are to reduce our reliance on foreign oil, pills like the new CAFE standards will have to be swallowed. The opponents with the exception of  Toyota have had their heads buried in the sand on both MPG and quality. No longer are they powerful or important enough to be evenly aligned with the nation interest. Remember the line "what is good for GM is good for the country" from GM president Charles Wilson. It’s not true anymore.

American carmakers have repeatedly dug holes for themselves and cried wolf when it came to mandatory safety features such as air bags. It is in the national interest to raise mileage standards as high as we possibly can. I vote yes on the 35 MPG intiative. What about you?

       

Posted by John Dodge on August 14, 2007 | Comments (6)
Industries:

July 2, 2008
In response to: New CAFE MPG rules for automakers rule
Huh... commented:

I say yes to 50mpg. 35 is just not going to do the job.


August 21, 2007
In response to: New CAFE MPG rules for automakers rule
John Dodge commented:

Not sure why Toyota is so against it. And why it takes 13 years to reach 35 MPG is a very good question.


August 15, 2007
In response to: New CAFE MPG rules for automakers rule
Car Fan commented:

The New Yorker has a good take on legislating fuel economy www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2007/07/23/070723ta_talk_surowiecki


August 15, 2007
In response to: New CAFE MPG rules for automakers rule
John in Michigan commented:

Why not make it 100MPG if we''re dreaming? Detroit can meet a 35MPG standard for cars - they do it in Europe. Of course, in Europe the government taxes gas to the tune of $6+ per gallon, they subsidize deisel engines so they aren''t too expensive, and the roads are much, much narrower. Bottom line - it''s not a technology problem, it''s a consumer problem. You can make all the 35MPG compact cars you want, but consumers in the US have no reason NOT to buy the trucks, SUV, and huge crossover vehicles. And if you think those vehicles will get 35MPG anytime soon, I''d like some of what you''re smoking.


August 15, 2007
In response to: New CAFE MPG rules for automakers rule
Steve in Texas commented:

I say CAFE is too lenient on them even with the proposed bill. Should it really take 13 years to increase MPG to 35? Instead, they should change CAFE to require lighter stronger vehicles with an emphasis on oil alternatives such as the hybrids that have been embraced now.


August 15, 2007
In response to: New CAFE MPG rules for automakers rule
Fishman commented:

If the opponents have their heads buried in the sand with the exception of Toyota, why is Toyota opposing the legislation??

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the code above:

Advertisement
Advertisement

Design News Partner Zones

AnarkCAD/CAE Model Clean-Up: Reduce Iterative Cycles
This webinar featured research and survey results related to problems associated with preparing CAD geometry for CAE applications.  We discussed how Recipe-Based Automation can help create "just-in-time" CAE-ready geometry each time a cad model is updated. Watch the Presentation


Light Matters: Systems Level Approach to HBLED illumination applications
Its good practice to apply a systems-level approach to high-brightness LED (HBLED) illumination applications. Minimally, the system includes the optical, thermal and electrical characteristics of the of the HBLED, the lens (if any) which is built-in to its package, secondary optics such as external plastic lenses/reflectors to direct the light as your application requires and power driver electronics. Read More


Design Engineers' Portal for Sensing and Machine Safety
Whatever industry you're in, or whatever product you manufacture, the right sensors to automate your plant, and to improve your overall efficiency, quality and safety are a must. You'll find Banner Engineering to be an amazing resource of products, training and people with expertise.

Design News Partner Zone Directory »

Please visit these other Reed Business sites