You will be redirected to your destination in 10 seconds.
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (3)
Warning: Plane crash web sites abound
Did a fuel line give way? Did a fuel pump not shut down as it should? Did a fitting of some sort fail? Investigators will be looking at all those possibilities from the fire and explosion on the left engine of a China Airlines B-737-809 yesterday as it stood parked at the gate at Naha Airport in Okinawa, Japan. Fortunately, there were no fatalies. After the flames were extinguished, the crumpled fuselage resemmbled a beached whale.
In investigating the accident, I did not turn to CNN or the NYTImes. Rather, I look at sites like Planecrashinfo.com and 1001.com. Digging into these sites are not for the squeamish flyer who hears every odd noise and feels every bump. Err, that would be me. I estimate I’ver flown at least 1.5 million miles, almost all of it on commercial jetliners. My only brushes with disaster were severe turbulence and an on-the-taxiway fender bender.
Anyhow, there’s an amazing amount verbiage, hair-raising accounts, sounds and videos about plane crashes on the web. Did you know, American Airlines has had 38 accidents since 1931? Do you want to read or hear the last words from pilots and co-pilots (this one offers a warning that it may be "disturbing" to some.) How about an account from Delta 767 pilot who took right behind United Flight 93 on 9-11? How about fatal events per millions of flights?
For someone who flies, viewing these stats and stories seems like tempting fate. But I feel better when internalizing this reassuring statistic from Planecrashinfo.com: "If a passenger boarded a flight at random, once a day, every day, it would be approximately 22,000 years before he or she would be killed."
Undetermined commented:
I am new to this site and impressed with the content. I am disappointed with frequent misspellings, which throw credibility into question. This article has at least one misspelling; an article on the Tobin Bridge was significantly flawed, weakinging its credibility. Perhaps authors could cut-and-paste their work into a document, spell check, and paste back. We'd all be better off.
Undetermined commented:
Best, Indeed, they abound. What's your favorite?
Undetermined commented:
www.airdisaster.com
Sponsored Content
Design News Partner Zones
JUNE 24TH WEBCAST: Collaborative Requirements Engineering
Speed your innovation. Capture the "voice of the customer" and translate customer requests into user requirements that define new products. Find out why the new ENOVIA Requirements Management solution enables organizations to improve their overall global requirements management process. Read More
Light Matters: Systems Level Approach to HBLED illumination applications
Its good practice to apply a systems-level approach to high-brightness LED (HBLED) illumination applications. Minimally, the system includes the optical, thermal and electrical characteristics of the of the HBLED, the lens (if any) which is built-in to its package, secondary optics such as external plastic lenses/reflectors to direct the light as your application requires and power driver electronics. Read More
Design Engineers' Portal for Sensing and Machine Safety
Whatever industry you're in, or whatever product you manufacture, the right sensors to automate your plant, and to improve your overall efficiency, quality and safety are a must. You'll find Banner Engineering to be an amazing resource of products, training and people with expertise.

