Engineers are a talented bunch. And although their talents typically take them to a quiet office or a lab, that's not always so. Sometimes, their gifts place them in the limelight, and we tend to forget where they started.
Jimmy Carter and Herbert Hoover, for example, took their talents to the top spot in world politics. Tom Landry used his analytical skills to become a legendary football coach. And Alfred Hitchcock's innate intelligence launched a career as history's most recognizable film director.
Of course, there will always be a few who are rumored to be engineers, but aren't. Folklore has it, for example, that Cindy Crawford, Ashton Kutcher, and Mr. T were engineers. But none were awarded engineering degrees or toiled as engineers. And Mayim Bialik, best known from Blossom and as Amy Farrah Fowler on The Big Bang Theory, went from child star to earning a PhD in neuroscience from UCLA. She will be speaking this week at Design West.
Here, we've collected photos of individuals, most of whom earned engineering degrees and then found fame elsewhere. Did we miss anyone? Tell us in the comments section below. Click the image below to start the slideshow.
Filmmaker Alfred Hitchcock directed Psycho, The Birds, North by Northwest, Rear Window, Vertigo, and many other major movies, but started his working life as an engineer. He studied engineering at the London County Council School of Engineering and Navigation and worked as a draftsman before launching a career in movies in the 1920s. (Source: Wikipedia)
Very informative post. I have two friends who graduated from engineering schools then went right into law school. One is now a patent attorney and the other owns a retail establishment ( Starbucks ). Somewhat sad but reality, I know several graduate engineers who started working as engineers but realized there was no real money in the profession and looked elsewhere for their livelyhood. I think we can all agree that engineering required critical thinking and that's what other professions can use.
While US Congressman Joe Barton is an engineer, I don't think I would have used him as an example in this article. He's made a habit of saying (and doing) some amazingly ridiculous things over the years.
The problem with engineering has always been that while it offers good salaries straight out of school, the money flattens out pretty fast. I suspect some of these people found ways to keep their salaries moving up the curve, especially the Congressmen who don't have to pay taxes. And, yes, bobjengr, I agree that engineering offers great critical thinking skills.
I agree that it's a bad idea to lump all degrees together when analyzing the value of college, naperlou. Given the lists that come out every year with engineering grads earning the highest average salaries year after year, though, I don't understand why there's always a shortage of engineering graduates. The law of supply and demand would seem to indicate that there would eventually be a surplus of engineering grads, and the starting salaries would drop due to an influx of students migrating to engineering. But that never seems to happen. Year after year, engineering grads have the highest annual starting salaries.
"The law of supply and demand would seem to indicate that there would eventually be a surplus of engineering grads, and the starting salaries would drop due to an influx of students migrating to engineering. But that never seems to happen."
The law of supply and demand is sensitive to the "cost of the degree". The reality is that many engineering schools now take five years to complete. This makes an engineering degree 25% more costly than other fields.
Better engineering schools have higher tuition costs, although a mix of commumity college and engineering school can mitigate under some circumstances. But the engineering curricula makes transfer from community college more difficult since foundational engineering and science courses are introduced sophomore year.
The biggest impediment to operation of the law of supply and demand in engineers is that all engineering degrees are hard work! Some fields are "only" difficult, but most are just plain challenging. Folks who "hated trig" or "hated physics" in High School are probably ill suited to taking on an engineering degree in College.
I wholeheartedly agree with your comment, "The biggest impediment to the operation of the law of supply and demand in engineers is that all engineering degrees are hard work," jpratch. As John Sununu put it, "No amount of glibness will get you through a thermodynamics exam." It's a hard degree to get.
I would like to set the record straight. Jimmy Carter is not an engineer!
I am a Georgia Tech alumnus. Many years ago shortly after Jimmy Carter
left office, the faculty of Ga Tech decided to honor Jimmy Carter by granting him
an honorary engineering degree, due to the fact that he attended Ga Tech for a very short period long ago. I believe it was on quarter. He transferred to a military school after that.
When the alumni of Ga Tech got wind of the honorary degree there was a large outcry. So the administration of Ga Tech, in order to preserve the peace, agreed to in the future only consider US presidents with a history at Ga Tech for honorary degrees.
So I repeat - Jimmy Carter has an unearned lambskin - his degree was given to him as part of a ceremony only. It is a degree in Nuclear Engineering.
It should be obvious if you hear him discuss it, he calls it 'nucular' engineering.
American actor, James Hong, studied to be a civil engineer at USC. He recently starred as "Grandpa Chen" in the movie RIPD. I remember him best as "David Lo Pan", the villian in Big Trouble in Little China". He also did a hilarious bit part in an episode of "the Drew Carey Show".
You neglected GENERAL SIR JOH MONASH, the smartest general you never heard of, unless you are Australian. His face is on the Australian $100 bill. When he died, 10% of all the Australians in the world were at his funeral. He built railroads, introduced reinforced concrete to Australia, and electrified the state of Victoria. He was also a patent lawyer and a concert pianist. After he took command of the Australian Corps in 1918, he never lost a battle and spearheaded the "hundred days campaign" which defeated the Germans on the Western Front. However, most histories of WW1 don't mention him or skip most of his accomplishements, because the Brits didn't like him. (1) He was a reservist, a civilian when the war broke out, not a member of the old boys club. (2) He was Australian, not British, and used innovative tactics not found in the approved manuals. (3) He was an engineer, not a cavalryman, and entirely too intellectual for the British Army. (He was also fluent in German) (4) And the reason he wasn't welcome in their officers' clubs, he was a (nonpracticing) Jew. if you Google him, you will likely find Monash University, named after him, and the town of Monash, built by him. Several of his concrete bridges are still in use. He was also active in civic affairs, like veterans affairs and the Boy Scouts.
Could our view of distant galaxies be obstructed by a lawnmower? That unlikely question is at the heart of a growing debate between the National Radio Astronomy Observatory and a robot manufacturer that seeks to build self-guided lawnmowers.
Design News readers spoke loudly and clearly after our recent news story about a resurgence in manufacturing -- and manufacturing jobs. Commenters doubted the manufacturers, describing them as H-1B visa promoters, corporate crybabies, and clowns. They argued that US manufacturers aren’t willing to train workers, preferring instead to import cheap labor from abroad.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.