HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Electronics News

Boeing's Woes Shouldn't Be an Indictment of Electric Cars

View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>
Niel
User Rank
Gold
Re: It sucks to be the new kid
Niel   2/5/2013 10:01:56 AM
NO RATINGS
"At one time they put out a broadly repeated story that automobiles were dangerous because driving at more than 17 mph could be harmfull."

I wondered where the UK gov't got the idea 20 mph limits was a good idea!

 

Thanks for that.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Designers without applying knowlege = Danger.
naperlou   2/5/2013 10:02:59 AM
Chuck, it is a wonder that the engineers at Boeing do not seem to have provided enough battery protection, or cooling, is puzzling.  It is puzzling on a couple of levels.  The first is that Boeing is an aerospace company, and that kind of thing is very important in that world.  The second is tha they do not seem to be up on the latest research.  Any reading of the information available from vendors of CAE software, such as Ansys and Comsol, would reveal lots of articles about lithium ion battery research from the major auto companies.  One of the recurrent issues is cooling. 

Don't forget, though, that there was that case of the Chevy Volt that had been used in a crash test caught fire after sitting there for a couple of weeks, if I recall correctly.  You wrote an article mentioning it just about one year ago.  And, of course, there is the celebrated case of the Apple laptop batteries that caught fire.  These are power sources that are very good, but do requre, as many of your readers point out, some very good engineering to use safely.  I use one in my laptop and I am now comfortable using it in my lap.  That, in itself, says something.

aeroEngr512
User Rank
Iron
Battery-powered cars and Boeing's Li-ion problem
aeroEngr512   2/5/2013 10:29:56 AM
Recent publications on Li batteries indicate that Li-ion batteries have a problem which NiCads do not: The former melt at a very low temperature and once the process starts, it doesn't end until the battery is consumed in a catastrophic meltdown, thus the fires. NiCads, however, require double the weight for the same energy storage, thus the urge to use Li's.

One can readilly extrapolate that the new Li's used on the aircraft are larger than previous models, thus quite possibly creating a temperature gradient from the innermost cells to the outside which is risky in terms of reaching the melting point within the battery. If this be true, two cures are indicated: (1) active cooling of the batteries (not currently provided for in the Boeing design), including possibly active cooling within the battery volume, and temperture sensing within the battery (also apparently not included) as a control signal to the charging circuitry.

Battery powered cars are a product of the man-made global warming theory and taxpayer subsidies. If one believes in the theory, then one should be prepared to have egg on one's face when the theory is finally accepted as a hoax. Quiz: Who was it that said back in 1933 that "if you tell a lie and keep repeating it, the lie will come to be accepted as the truth ... the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie and thus, by extention, the truth is the mortal enemy of the state"? Hint: der Fuerher loved this guy.

l_jhanson
User Rank
Silver
Re: Designers without applying knowlege = Danger.
l_jhanson   2/5/2013 12:41:29 PM
NO RATINGS
A couple of issues I have with the overall reporting of this problem...
First, everyone discribes the battery as Boeing's design... Having worked in aerospace, this part very likely was subcontracted... That does not relieve Boeing of responsibility, but the Boeing engineers I have worked with are excellent aerospace people, maybe not battery people... Therefore the possible outsourcing...

Second, many have freely tossed around the word 'fire'... related to this failure... I know, many of our parents probably stated "where there is smoke, there is fire!" but in reality there isn't always... It is obvious there was significant heat released, and a great amount of smoke... but maybe not flame... My experience with lithium-ion batteries leads me to believe there quite possibly was not flame generated... The batteries have high energy density but unlike gasoline, I have not experienced flame or explosion as a result of failure...

Thinking_J
User Rank
Platinum
Arm chair quarterbacks... ?
Thinking_J   2/5/2013 1:54:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Many thoughtful comments .. and better informed than in most media.

The fact remains..

We are just speculating with limited specific knowledge to the details of the two 787 Dreamliners with damaged batteries. This is a very small sample size to make generalizations with. And, yes, media's love of speculation is likely to hurt the image of anything with Li-ion batteries. And that is unfair.

 

Old US Air force definition of an airplane:

A group of compromises , flying in close formation.

 

diskguy
User Rank
Silver
Not all Lithium Batteries need cooling
diskguy   2/5/2013 2:44:43 PM
NO RATINGS
There are several lithium ion chemistries available and the cobalt based battery is well known to be thermally unstable.  Recall computer laptop fires? 

If a 'safe' chemistry had been considered, e.g. manganese based lithium then this would have increased the thermal margin such that cooling is not needed and another failure mode is avoided.  Keep it simple!!

diskguy
User Rank
Silver
Re: Designers without applying knowlege = Danger.
diskguy   2/5/2013 2:49:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Not all lithium batteries require cooling so maybe avoiding heat generating batteries would make this a non issue? 

Flyby
User Rank
Silver
Boeing's Woes
Flyby   2/5/2013 4:26:52 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems to me that Lithium Ion battery technology has not reached the maturity that resulted in grounding 30+ aircraft, at millions of dollars a day, regardles of any power to weight benefit. If a car has a fire you can quickly pull over and get out. If an aircraft has a fire in flight what do you do?

At the time the US government certified Boeing's 787 Dreamliners as safe, federal rules barred the type of batteries used to power the airliner's electrical systems from being carried as cargo on passenger planes because of the fire risk.

Boeing appears to have taken gamble and lost. Poor design, poor engineering, poor implementation or.... eventually we will know.

Thinking_J
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Boeing's Woes
Thinking_J   2/5/2013 4:58:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Wrong .. or at least misleading / outdated info.

The same day the first battery failed on a Dreamliner... FAA had changed the rules concerning shipping of Li-ion batterys..

They (Li-ion batteries) have been cleared for transport on passenger flights.

 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Designers without applying knowlege = Danger.
Charles Murray   2/5/2013 5:08:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Those who have cited concerns about the use of the word "fire" make good points, which are well-received here. In these articles, however, I've used the word "fire" as it was used by the National Transportation Safety Board, which did the teardown and even used the word "fire" in its press release headline of January 14th: "NTSB Provides Second Investigative Update on Boeing 787 Battery Fire in Boston." Also in the lede of the press release: "The National Transportation Safety Board today released a second update on the January 7 fire aboard a Japan Airlines Boeing 787 at Logan International Airport in Boston." As several commenters have suggested, the word "fire" is often used incorrectly. Here, however, it appears to be appropriate, based on the NTSB's investigation.

<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Electronics News
The American motorcycle is enjoying a mini-renaissance today, as the recent success of bike manufacturers Harley-Davidson, Indian Motorcycle, and Victory Motorcycles, among others, amply indicate.
The question of whether engineers could have foreseen the shortcut maintenance procedures that led to the crash of American Airlines Flight 191 in 1979 will probably linger for as long as there is an engineering profession.
More than 35 years later, the post-mortem on one of the country’s worst engineering disasters appears to be simple. A contractor asked for a change in an original design. The change was approved by engineers, later resulting in a mammoth structural collapse that killed 114 people and injured 216 more.
If you’re an embedded systems engineer whose analog capabilities are getting a little bit rusty, then you’ll want to take note of an upcoming Design News Continuing Education Center class, “Analog Design for the Digital World,” running Monday, Nov. 17 through Friday, Nov. 21.
It’s time once again for the Annual Design News Science and Engineering Movie Contest, which names no winners, awards no prizes, isn’t really a contest, and appears every three years or so.
Design News Webinar Series
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service