HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Electronic News & Comment

Are Automotive 'Black Boxes' Secure?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/3  >  >>
Sturat
User Rank
Iron
Re: BLACK BOXES
Sturat   1/22/2013 11:08:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Being one of the engineers that worked on the initial development of this technology, it's amusing to read some of the comments from people who have little knowledge of what has already been implemented. The standard for airbag crash sensing systems is 0.99995 with 95% reliability - and you can imagine the amount of testing that is required to achieve that standard. In the early days of electronic crash sensing, when the technology was evolving from electromechanical sensing, engineers needed field data to validate the crash sensing algorithms, and to datamine relevant data for further algorithm development. The technology was developed to record only deployment events and near-deployment events, and to lock the data securely after a deployment event. The data was passively collected from barrier tests, taxi cab, police car, and rental car fleets and was used to validate the system before it ever got approval for use in passenger vehicles. Our families ride in the vehicles with the systems we design.

I guess in your line of engineering, design validation and continuous improvement by collection of field data is to be considered "crap"?  Remind me what products you develop so I can avoid them.

That being said, once the technology is developed, the toothpaste is out of the tube, and bean counters and polticians abusing it can only be prevented by informed and active citizens. The government has no business using this data to incriminate individuals a priori, and should only be made available as subject to a warrant as provided in our 4th Amendment protections, until that goes away along the lines that the 9th, 10th, and 2nd Amendments are being assaulted today.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: More big brother
tekochip   1/11/2013 11:25:47 AM
NO RATINGS
I couldn't agree more.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: BLACK BOXES
Charles Murray   1/10/2013 10:02:40 PM
NO RATINGS
For those who care to learn more, here's a link to NHTSA's event data recorder research web site:

http://www.nhtsa.gov/Research/Event+Data+Recorder+(EDR)/Welcome+to+the+NHTSA+Event+Data+Recorder+Research+Web+site

g-whiz
User Rank
Gold
More big brother
g-whiz   1/4/2013 10:03:36 AM
NO RATINGS
   This has nothing to do with saving lives or public safety. Follow the money, folks. This is all about about making sure the proper party gets blamed and they are sued to the hilt. They only want to make sure the data can't be tampered with so it will stand up in court.


   As has already happened (i.e. rental car companies), data will be collected about where and how fast you were going (via GPS) for the purpose of revenue collection. You will simply get a speeding ticket in the mail informing you of the infraction. Again, its just money folks. "Public safety" is just a smoke screen to make the program appear palatable.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: BLACK BOXES
Charles Murray   1/2/2013 6:16:04 PM
NO RATINGS
If you're wearing a "tin foil hat," bobjengr, then there's a lot of us wearing the same hat.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Legal issues
Charles Murray   1/2/2013 6:13:23 PM
NO RATINGS
You raise a bunch of good points, TJ. One, quite notably, is "who is behind this initiative?" If you consider that 96% of vehicles already have the technology, and the manufacturers did so without the prodding of a mandate, it tells you a lot.  

GeoOT
User Rank
Silver
Black box big and little brother
GeoOT   12/30/2012 2:13:45 PM
NO RATINGS
The issues brought up here need to be sorted out and fast.  The technology (e.g. OnStar) is upon us so that no physical contact with the vehicle is necessary in order to suck out the memory contents of a VDR.  We can still buy a car that doesn't have a VDR but that is going away soon.  How long will it be before cars will be required to have a cellular based wireless data connection.  When that cuts in the vehicle owner will be the LAST person in the data access permission chain.

nyeng
User Rank
Gold
Re: Data in crash recorders
nyeng   12/30/2012 1:21:07 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm all for software that allows you to erase the info.  That information will never help you.  It's there to let the government fine you or your insurance company to raise your rates.  Whatever they'll feed you about the data being helpful to science and there to save lives is a bunch of BS.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Black boxes and their abuse potential:Whose fault?
William K.   12/27/2012 10:41:30 PM
NO RATINGS
DO NOT blame all engineers for the creation of this concept and package. I may have been the first to suggest something, but my idea was a system to record seatbelt usage, the idea was that if occupants wee not wearing their belts that the insurance company would not need to pay anything. I still think that it would be a very effective incentive towards belt use. It would allow freedom of choice, but of course it would not allow freedom from consequences. But it does not ever seem to have been taken seriously.

rathomas
User Rank
Iron
Re: Data in crash recorders
rathomas   12/27/2012 11:24:39 AM
NO RATINGS
I like this idea and the technology has already existed for quite some time, though generally used for the opposite effect - disabling reads from a programmed device (ROM, microcontroller ROMs) to protect IP.  This has also been done in a non-desctructive way where memory read/write can be re-enabled, but only after erasing the contents. 

) Take that existing tech, repurposed to write-protecting the memory

) add in on-board logic that monitors the sensor values of interest and locks the memory to read-only after a catastrophic event was detected

) possibly add the ability to re-enable writes (so the hardware could be reused), but only after incrementing a non-resetable, non user-writable counter that indicates writing was enabled after a catastrophic event.

Page 1/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Electronic News & Comment
Conventional wisdom holds that MIT, Cal Tech, and Stanford are three of the country’s best undergraduate engineering schools. Unfortunately, when conventional wisdom visits the topic of best engineering schools, it too often leaves out some of the most distinguished programs that don’t happen to offer PhD-level degrees.
If you're planning to develop a product that uses a microcontroller, you'll want to take note of next week's Design News Continuing Education course, "MCU Software Development – A Step-by-Step Guide."
The diesel engine, long popular on European roads, is now piquing the interest of American automakers.
As more electric cars and plug-in hybrids hit the highways, the need for battery chargers is growing.
If the design of Subaru’s XV Crosstrek Hybrid car is any indication, we may now be seeing the next new wrinkle in the evolution of automotive test simulation.
Design News Webinar Series
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 22 - 26, MCU Software Development – A Step-by-Step Guide (Using a Real Eval Board)
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service