HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Electronic News & Comment

UL Targets Lithium-Ion Battery Fires

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Suprised UL is not already involved
Elizabeth M   8/6/2013 1:34:02 PM
NO RATINGS
I know what you mean, Lou, it seems like there has to be an incident with serious consequences before companies improve certain aspects of their products or, in the case of the airline industry, airplanes. But in all fairness, perhaps they weren't aware that there was potential for such problems in the first place. This is where more careful and attentive design with anything, especially lithium-ion batteries, must come into play.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: A Good Vent
tekochip   8/6/2013 1:51:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I made a careless mistake and paid for in seconds.  The cell energetically disassembled without the slightest hint that it was aggravated with me.  As if the chemical burns weren't bad enough, the freed lithium also ignited, so I had to figure out if I wanted to wash my eyes out first or put out the little fires scattered across my workbench.


Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A Good Vent
Elizabeth M   8/6/2013 1:53:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Oh my gosh, that sounds horrible. I hope you are OK. I take it you have learned alot from this situation and I guess having some kind of guidelines or test to prevent such a thing in the future is something you would welcome. Take care!

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: A Good Vent
tekochip   8/6/2013 2:26:16 PM
Always wear your safety glasses in the lab.

 

I washed my eyes out first and just a few minor burns on my neck and face.

D Hambley
User Rank
Silver
Is UL's indenting test valid?
D Hambley   8/6/2013 5:58:27 PM
NO RATINGS
I really think UL has missed the point on this one. One of the mysteries concerning L-ion cell failures is why L-ion cells short in the first place! This "indenting test" which forces a short to make it fail will NOT test to see if a cell has been designed and built to avoid shorts. All it does is to test whether a cell overheats AFTER this mysterious short. It's like UL is saying, "it's OK to have a cell which mysteriously shorts. After a forced short though, we want to ensure that it doesn't overheat." I say go after the cause, not the result.

MIROX
User Rank
Platinum
Packaging
MIROX   8/7/2013 4:57:34 AM
NO RATINGS
I think it is great that someone be it UL or who ever can come up with some safety test, not just for Li Battery but for ANY battery.

From experience I also think that the entire "package" needs to be evaluated and tested, as for example I have seen more than one Golf Cart where the entire vehicle burned down, just because one battery wire was having too high a resistance and caused enough heat to not just melt a Lead-alloy post but ignite what ever was next to it, which in turn burned down the entire vehicle.

Other example may be the few Fisker cars, that burned for what ever reason, but one of them was apparently short in "cooling fan motor" that burned off entire 1/2 of front end of the car.

So NOT having easily flammable materials next to "potential" ignition source, be it extreme heat or spark, is also somthing about which engineers need to think about and design in appropriate safety.

I.e. if battery fails, for what ever reason, the device, be it computer or a car, should not be a total loss as a result !

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A Good Vent
Elizabeth M   8/7/2013 7:58:38 AM
NO RATINGS
That sounds like good advice, tekochip--in fact, it sounds a bit like a no brainer! But I guess an experienced engineer might get lazy sometimes with safety? I'm personally not an engineer and don't do a lot of work in a lab situation, so I wouldn't know, but I guess if you do something every day you might think you can slack a bit with the safety precautions. It's good to remind people not to! Glad you came out of the accident OK.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Indentation
Charles Murray   8/7/2013 8:34:05 PM
NO RATINGS
The indentation tests used by UL bring to mind the GM battery solution of 2012. After a post-crash fire, GM beefed up the vehicle, adding a cross-bar structure and longitudinally-oriented members around the battery. They did this, despite the fact that the Volt fire was actually caused by spilling of coolant on a circuit board, not by indentation. Many people scratched their heads and asked why GM was beefing up the battery so much. Maybe the UL indentation test provides us a glimpse of their thinking.

Ralphy Boy
User Rank
Platinum
Re: A Good Vent
Ralphy Boy   8/8/2013 4:45:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Around here we call 'extreme prejudice' 'spontaneous disassembly with report'. Which meets the rough definition of an explosion...

This is not so common for most consumer level single cell/small plastic pack applications, but we have tested to failure a few designs that absolutely go... BOOM!

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A Good Vent
Charles Murray   8/8/2013 6:00:27 PM
NO RATINGS
As I always say, we've got smart readers around here. I had never heard of "rupture with extreme prejudice" nor "spontaneous diassembly with report." But I know those phrases now. Thank you for adding to my collection of engineering stoicisms.

<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Electronic News & Comment
The diesel engine, long popular on European roads, is now piquing the interest of American automakers.
As more electric cars and plug-in hybrids hit the highways, the need for battery chargers is growing.
If the design of Subaru’s XV Crosstrek Hybrid car is any indication, we may now be seeing the next new wrinkle in the evolution of automotive test simulation.
Despite recent news reports to the contrary, cold winter weather was probably no more than a minor contributor to the Boeing 787’s lithium-ion battery fires last year.
Using sensors and a specialized test stand, engineers have discovered that the root causes of head trauma may lie in a complex pattern of forces that today’s football helmets aren’t equipped to handle.
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 8 - 12, Get Ready for the New Internet: IPv6
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service