"He viewed collaboration as the beating heart of his laboratories, a sustaining resource that fueled the knowledge assets of his sprawling innovation empire," Caldicott writes in the book.
In a discussion with Design News, she told us about Edison's emphasis on collaboration. She also gave us four suggestions for innovative product design, based on Edison's approach.
Know your colleagues
Too often, design engineers put in their time and leave the office without sharing their ideas, or themselves, with their colleagues. "In a real collaboration, there should be a focus on learning from others and leveraging their strengths," she said.
Midnight Lunch encourages innovators to follow Edison’s penchant for collaboration. (Source: Wiley)
The 10-12 members of Edison's team accomplished that by sharing a pool of common experience. They often returned to the lab after dinner and checked on ongoing experiments. Edison insisted that they share their notebooks with one another -- the better to understand how each team member's ideas fit in the grand technical plan. They also engaged in "midnight lunches," occasionally working deep into the night together and in many cases following no prescribed work schedule. Edison was a proponent of flex hours long before it became a corporate practice.
Caldicott insists that such methods create an important camaraderie. "When people share dinner and go back to work, it makes for a collegial environment. It's more than just a raw exchange of ideas. The team members become colleagues."
Encourage diverse viewpoints
Many engineering environments include large teams whose members come from similar backgrounds. Often such teams are made up solely of mechanical engineers, electrical engineers, or software engineers.
Edison believed that homogeneous teams were less effective. When he was developing his incandescent light bulb, his team members included physicists, mathematicians, and chemists. He also brought in individuals with backgrounds in prototyping. "Sometimes, when teams of engineers get together, they are like minded. They speak the same language. But it's very important that they learn someone else's language and see the problem from their perspective."
Consider at least three options
It's tempting for engineering teams to lock in on one solution very early in the development process, but Caldicott encourages teams to consider multiple options. Edison often considered 10 or more ideas. For the incandescent bulb, he examined a dozen.
By approaching the problem in that way, team members engage more effectively and understand the big picture more thoroughly.
If you have a working rule of at least three options, it forces you out of your comfort zone. Teams need to explore. They need to understand which options are closer to the status quo and which are out there. Only by doing that can they begin to understand the boundaries of their problem.
Always consider the customer
One of Edison's few failures was the electric vote recorder, which he designed without sufficient back-and-forth discourse with users. From that failure, he learned a valuable lesson. "He realized that, when he didn't listen to customer needs, he failed."
When she speaks to technical teams, Caldicott is surprised to find how many engineers haven't learned that lesson. "Engineers tend to fall in love with their technologies, but you need to do the research. Visit the customer facility, look at trends, or talk to people who are using similar products. You should always take some time to find out what the customer's needs are."
Yes, naps can be a help, Liz. Edison used to claim that by napping with his head on Watt's Dictionay of Chemistry, he absorbed the intricacies of chemistry.
To clarify; sans (earlier) cynicism: To motivate collaboration among creative & talented people, rewards from successes must be equably distributed, other-wise the word is: exploitation.
Interesting story, Chuck! I doubt any true slacker ever came up with a great invention! And even great inventors need to sleep...he probably took cat naps in between great bouts of pondering and experimenting. :) Actually, when I shared an office in NYC I had a writer friend who used to have a pillow under her desk so she could take short naps between bursts of writing. It definitely gets the creative juices flowing to reset in between bursts of work, I think.
Yes, Liz, there's a lot more to Edison's succss than collaboration. One of the aspects not mentioned here is the work hours. Edison was notorious for working long hours, and even sleeping on his desk in the lab, using Watts' Dictionary of Chemistry as his pillow. When I visited Edison's lab in Fort Myers, FL, a couple of years ago, I saw that that lab had a cot. So, apparently, Edison slept in the lab at his vacation home, too. My guess is that it's a lot easier to collaborate with your workers when you're in the lab 20 hours a day.
Rob, I don't think Boeing is a poster-child for collaborative design. The 787 was 2 years behind schedule because their suppliers could not execute, from fastener shortages, to build problems (in Italy), to steep learning curves in Japan.
The battery design that grounded the fleet would also not be a good example of supplier collaboration.
One of the interesting things Edison did to further collaboration was to choose each year a student or young engineer to come and work with him. In evaluating the potential, lucky student, Edison sought personality qualities over knowledge.
I missed that article, but that ;position -- that collaboration isn't so wonderful -- is a contrarian point of view at this point. Boeing led the collaborative design movement in the late 199s by bringing suppliers into the design process. Now the automotive industry is hip deep in the water, sending tons of design to suppliers in collaborative joint efforts.
Yes, I think it often depends on someone's mood or what type of person they are. Some people just don't like working with other people. I myself am a people person in general, so find collaboration very helpful. That said, in the work I do now, I work alone and in quite a solitary way, so collaboration doesn't come into play. But I'm not an inventor...so I would think bouncing ideas off of others definitely has its place. That's an interesting story about Edison! It's nice to think it's true...often it is people with no formal education who have the type of mind to think outside of the box.
However, Edison was wasteful in his early days of design. The trial and error method was costing a fortune.
Frank J. Sprague joined Edison's team and taught (forced them to learn) the mathematical method. Design on paper first before performing trials. Changed the company forever.
In response to rising interest in autonomous vehicles, the federal government has called upon states not to authorize operation of self-driving cars, except for the purpose of testing.
With LEDs dropping in price virtually every year, automakers have begun employing them, not only on luxury vehicles, but on entry-level models, as well.
Using almost 200 light-emitting diodes in the front and back of the new 2014 CTS, Cadillac designers are showing how LEDs can change the character of a vehicle.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 5
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This radio show will show what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
28 
