The Objet1000 is Objet Ltd.'s largest printer to date and features a 1,000mm x 800mm x 500mm build envelope along with the company's renowned Connex multi-material capability.
This printer, which was displayed at Euromold 2012, is big and means business; it's not your average hobbyist printer that you would find in your neighbor's garage. Measuring about the size of a compact car, the Objet1000 was designed to be used within industries such as automotive, defense, medical, or any other sector that may benefit from large, industrial size, 1:1 precise prototypes.
It uses the effective and efficient technology previously used by Objet. Utilizing its Connex multi-material capability, the printer can simultaneously print two different materials. Additionally, the company offers more than 100 different materials, which can all be used to print products with different properties. As a result, designers and engineers have the capability to create materials with unique thermal or mechanical properties or materials that can bend like a rubber.
The Objet1000, the world's largest 3D printer as of December 2012, has a work envelope of 1,000mm x 800mm x 500mm at a 16 micron resolution. This image shows the scale of the Objet1000, definitely not something for the living room hobbyist.
Objet technology also features the industry's highest resolution, which really sets it apart from anything else. Materials printed from the machine are based on a 16 micron layering process, whereas Makerbot's Replicator 2 can achieve a quality within 100 micron layers. Formlabs recently released a printer using a similar printing technology as Objet that can print as precise as 25 microns. However, Makerbot and Formlabs alike are both designed to bring 3D printing home and cannot even begin to compare to the size Objet1000 can work with.
Concept modeling for companies can be a lengthy and expensive process. The Objet1000 would be a good investment for many companies. Some companies send their designs out to third parties and have to wait weeks before they can get their prototype. This wastes time and exposes their designs to others, which companies can be wary about. In addition, some companies may print many different pieces to make up a larger part. This can be less effective and result in a less accurate model. Objet also provides a return on investment (ROI) calculator to see what is right for the customer. After running the calculator, it seems my ROI will be 16 months for only a handful of small projects.
As 3D printing starts gaining momentum, more industries will begin to equip their research facilities with high-quality 3D printers. They are perfect for reducing concept build times and can save companies lots of money by eliminating third parties. The first printers available will be shipped starting in the second quarter of 2013, with a wider availability opening up in the second half of 2013. For those lucky enough to work with the Objet1000, the possibilities are endless. Though, I am sure the $40,000-plus USD price tag will keep it out of reach for most. Or only out of reach for 16 months, according to my ROI.
Interesting article. I find the possibilities of 3D printing really exciting. It's amazing what can be printed now with the growing sophistication of this technology...it seems like the sky is the limit. It also helps companies cut costs and even may even the playing field for smaller companies that can't afford to outsource big printing jobs but may be able to afford the technology to do it themselves.
I have spent quite a bit of time trying to justify purchasing a 3D printer. I have gone back and forth. I almost bought one a few time, with some sort of reason backing it up.
In the end I didn't get one. Mostly due to the fact that most parts created from them are flimsy and only good for a representation. At least is the printers I could afford.
When they can print glass-filled PVC, then a purchase will be made for sure.
Great story, Cabe. I don't think you're alone in wanting to justify the purchase of a 3D printer. I know numerous industrial designers who are anxious to buy one, as well, for use in prototyping.
Do these fiends of yours just want to make prototypes? How will that pay for itself, for them? I find it hard to imagine that they have machine shops build them prototypes all the time. Hence, where all the savings comes from.
The flimsy factor is a good point, Cabe. The prototyping aspect is attractive but you're right, when they reach the next level and support more sturdy materials printing then things will really get interesting.
Our office has a ObJet Alaris30 printer that fits on a tabletop and cost us over $45000, so I'm thinking the pricing mentioned in the article is an order of magnitude off. I don't see pricing on their website, so could the author verify the price?
Are you considering it for a business or yourself?
In the case of business applications, I can attest to the fact that having a rapid prototyping capability is a substantial benefit to my organization. We've used printing parts in almost every phase of the product development process: Test/assembly fixture parts, manifolds in finished products, usability testing prototypes, blanks for creating silicone molds for production parts. We have 4 3D printers of varying types and frequently each is running 24/7 to keep up with our 400 person organization. Being able to get functional parts in 24 hours has a tangible benefit in cutting project schedules, and that translates directly to money.
In the case of personal use, I can also attest to the benefit to having one on hand. The parts are only 'flimsy' if you attempt to use them in an application they aren't suited for. I've been printing everything from replacement parts for appliances to electronic enclosures and children's toys with great effect on my Solidoodle. I may not 'need' it, but I'm making very good use of it.
I design parts/devices for the CNC and paintball community. Almost everything is made out of aluminum. I would consider using plastic in a lot of my designs, but as I said, the strength is an issue.
I would use one to create a model representation I could hold, but it is not worth the printing. I could suffice with a digital 3D model.
If the plastics could become strong enough, I would get one without hesitation.
I think you're being a little too quick to write these technologies off for your application. In my experience EOS Materials are not flimsy.
We've had various electronic/mechanical covers and enclosures printed with EOS PA2200 (Nylon) that have seen field service for years without issue. They've easily passed durability tests that have included repeated 50mm diameter steel ball drops from 1 m without cracking or deflections of more than a fraction of a mm at thicknesses of 2mm - 4 mm. We've been printing LiPo battery enclosures (fully assembled weighing in at more than a 0.5 kg) in the PA2210FR material (flame rated) which have passed those same tests, as well as repeated drops onto hardwood floors from a 1 m.
The PA3200GF is even more durable and considerably more rigid, being glass filled.
You should connect with vendors such as EOS and 3D systems and actually get a look at what they have to offer. They even have aluminum filled materials too.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 5
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This radio show will show what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
16 
