TurboViewer Pro is already being used in that vein. Engineers are leveraging the app to showcase their latest designs at client sites, while remote field engineers are carrying tablets around a shop floor to leverage 3D designs to monitor quality in the production process. "For any task that involves mobility, the iPad is a better form factor to show off designs or drawings," Cochran says.
In 2012, IMSI/Design has plans to introduce a handful of apps that push the concept of mobility even further as it relates to improving traditional engineering workflows, according to Cochran. I guess we'll just have to stay tuned.
Well said, Alex. In one of our mobile posts recently, there was lots of discussion about consolidation and replacement--that is, any one computing paradigm (i.e., tablet, smart phone, laptop) replacing everything and be the singlely used, go-to computing tool. I think we're realizing that that won't be the case. That people will have mulitple computing devices for multiple use cases and that's fine with them. Therefore, as you say, there will be a variety of tools, in all shapes and sizes, that are right-sized for each platform.
I think the functionality issue is, different strokes for different folks. A tablet-based app is not going to have, nor should it have, the same functionality or purpose as a laptop app. We see this outside of CAD, so why shouldn't it obtain in CAD, too. Tablets are great for taking drawings into the field, but they're not so good for heavy data input and creating stuff from scratch. But that's not a negative; just that they're appropriate for different uses than laptops.
Jim, I totally understand your first impression and I think that's the barrier for most people who try to consider mobile design apps at first blush. But the idea is to see past a direct port of a traditional CAD or any other design tool to that new mobile platform and see a modified capability that meets a particular use case--as you well noted, taking the design outdoors or directly to the manufacturing site for explanation and markup. Not, as some are getting stuff on, doing full CAD creation on a somewhat limited mobile platform.
I admit my first impression was exactly that which you covered in the article, being that design engineers are skeptical about the quality and functionality of a tablet-based design application.But if I can reasonable think beyond that obvious shortcoming, and clearly see the value of taking "read-only" , or perhaps "red-line" version of layouts into the field or manufacturing floors, the benefits are obvious.
I think back to countless times when I was hovering over an assembly station in a manufacturing environment, trying to clarify the design intent of a prototype for the factory assembly personnel.Sometimes, there was a network based monitor nearby, and the effort was easier; but more often, there was no access to databases at all and the explanations were difficult. Having access to the databases to explain design intent is so helpful to clarify and educate for production.Manufacturing ramp-ups will get faster and easier.Further, going wireless and taking it outdoors, I would expect the construction industry to see increased adoption of the practice as well.
This is a trend that is important. Years ago I worked with a company that was creating a mobile viewing application for their CAD tools that leveraged cellular networks. They had provision for annotation and for continuing to work on downloaded content while disconnected from the network. Much of this had to be developed by the CAD vendor and partners. Today, much of that is included in the tablets and smart phones available today. So, while those applications were useful, a tablet with the ability to view design artifacts is going to prove more useful, and will perhaps take this to the next level. In addition, the tablets introduce new user interface possibilities that might prove useful.
Autodesk, a leader in 3D design solutions, announced earlier this month that it has completed its acquisition of Delcam, a leading supplier of CAD/CAM manufacturing software, in its efforts to expand the company’s manufacturing software capabilities.
Texas Instruments' Webench is vying to win the Golden Mousetrap Award in the Analysis & Calculation Software category, but it is up against some pretty tough competition from Mentor Graphics, COMSOL, and aPriori Inc.
Agilent, solidThinking, and MSC Software are hoping to take the top prize in the CAD/PDM/PLM software category of this year's Golden Mousetrap Awards. Here's what we know about solidThinking's Inspire.