HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Engineering Materials

Survey: Engineers Uncertain About CAFE Materials Choices

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAFE Moving Target
Ann R. Thryft   8/26/2014 6:13:46 PM
NO RATINGS
I think you've hit the nail on the head, Greg--it's all about uncertainty, coming from several different directions at once.



Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
CAFE Moving Target
Greg M. Jung   8/26/2014 5:55:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Great analytics in this article.  I found the last slide to be especially informative as the majority of respondents felt there would be an additional tightening of the already rigorous 2017-2025 CAFE standards and that they would be forced to design to a moving target of regulations (which caused more uncertainty).

Tweet
User Rank
Gold
Re: Not which materials but whether they're sufficient
Tweet   8/26/2014 8:58:53 AM
NO RATINGS
That's hitting the nail on the head: Will the choices currently available do the jobs they need to do? Safety cannot be assured when you've lightweighted everything. Momentum is conserved. If you take mass out of the car side of the car/truck crash scenario, then acceleration experienced by the car's occupants must go up, or the material must absorb that energy and dissipate it safely. I just don't see people spending $50k for a big styrofoam egg. 

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Not which materials but whether they're sufficient
Ann R. Thryft   8/25/2014 2:12:16 PM
NO RATINGS
It's interesting that engineers now mention composites and mixed materials often enough that they rank as separate categories--that's new (see Slide 3). The uncertainty seems to be about both which material will be the most important: aluminum vs steel vs composites vs plastics. It also seems to be about whether the choices currently available for engineers to actually use will do the jobs they need to do.

Partner Zone
More Blogs from Engineering Materials
Oak Ridge National Laboratory has developed a carbon fiber production method it wants to share with you: a faster, cheaper, greener method for manufacturing industrial-grade structural carbon fiber.
This slideshow includes several versions of multi-materials machines, two different composites processes including one at microscale, and two vastly different metals processes. Potential game-changers down the line include three microscale processes.
UL is partnering with metals additive manufacturing (AM) supplier EOS to provide AM training to EOS's customers. It's designed to promote correct usage of AM technologies by OEMs and others in manufacturing.
To commemorate Earth Day, we take a look at the state of ocean plastic. If things don't change, by 2050 the oceans will contain more plastic than fish by weight. Here are the problems, as well as some solutions.
As we learned at BIOMEDevice Boston, newer soft tissue implants must be lighter in weight and manufactured with less overall material. The same goes for medical packaging.
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 11 - 15, Designing ARM Devices Using Segger Tools
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service