Industry trade groups, materials manufacturers, and software companies are getting serious about helping automotive manufacturers with vehicle lightweighting. This spring, four different consortia and partnerships were formed to help automakers and suppliers do even more to step up vehicle weight loss.
At the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress in April, UK-based Granta Design unveiled the Automotive Material Intelligence Consortium, which will develop best-practices for materials information and use for automotive and off-road vehicle OEMs and suppliers in both Europe and the US. The company's materials information management software and database has played a key role in the aerospace and defense industry for metals and composites, as we've told you, and its MI: Automotive Package aims to do something similar for the automotive industry.
The new consortium is modeled after two others, the Material Data Management Consortium and the Environmental Materials Information Technology Consortium, which include members from multiple manufacturing sectors. Granta will provide software and tools for managing and integrating materials data, as well as data on polymers, composites, lightweight alloys, and automotive steels.
Click on the image below to start the slideshow.
Granta Design is spearheading the Automotive Material Intelligence Consortium, which will develop best-practices for materials information and use for automotive and off-road vehicle OEMs and suppliers in both Europe and the US. The project will build on established technology for material intelligence in automotive organizations. Shown here, accessing accurate materials data within CAD will be one of the key capabilities that will be enhanced and applied through the consortium's work.
(Source: Granta Design)
Also at the SAE World Congress, the American Chemistry Council (ACC) announced an updated version of its Plastics and Polymer Composites Technology Roadmap for Automotive Markets. The roadmap is intended to help OEMs and suppliers adopt the use of plastics and polymer composites for reducing vehicle weight. It recommends several cooperative, industry-wide demonstration projects to generate standardized materials data, as well as develop predictive models, specifications, and design guidelines. The intention is to give plastics and composites suppliers enough data so they can enhance their materials' properties and improve manufacturing and assembly, as well as continue to develop new materials. The ACC's Plastics Division says the roadmap is the result of close collaboration between its member companies and the automotive industry, as well as federal regulatory agencies and research firms.
A new partnership between polyamide maker Solvay Engineering Plastics and e-Xstream promises to give automotive OEMs better predictive simulation of shifting designs from metal to plastic by giving them access to more than 50 polyamide materials and 7,600 data files. The collaboration, announced in May, makes available to Solvay Engineering Plastics customers a simulation service called MMI (multi-scale modeling, mechanical calculation, injection molding simulation) Technyl Design. The service is based on e-Xstream's Digimat material modeling platform and Solvay's Technyl family of high-performance plastics for automotive and other industries. The MMI Technyl Design service integrates a comprehensive encrypted materials database and injection molding process modeling, allowing a wide range of calculations that help manufacturers accurately predict the performance of injection-molded parts.
Also in May, WorldAutoSteel launched its Advanced High-Strength Steels Application Guidelines Version 5.0. Version 5.0 of the guidelines covers newer types of materials that are now available, as well as advanced fabrication technologies and optimized joining processes, in addition to the metallurgy, forming, and joining topics that appeared in earlier versions. The 276-page guidelines discuss a wide range of advanced high-strength steel types such as dual-phase (DP), complex phase (CP), ferritic-bainitic (FB), martensitic (MS), transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP), hot-formed (HF), and twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP). The guidelines' Volume I covers metallurgy, forming, and joining subjects, while Volume II has more than 200 pages of case studies demonstrating actual manufacturing in practice.
In my time, I also owned a 1955 GM PD4104 highway coach. It was powered by a Detroit Diesel 6-71 (426 cu. in.) 2 cycle supercharged engine. Detroit Diesels have been discontinued, supposedly because newer engines have beter fuel economy. Cynics say Mercedes bought them out and shut them down.
It was also of a basic monocoque construction with lots of aluminum and a stiffening robust plywood floor. Air suspension was very smooth - surprisingly so on rough gravel roads. Our farm was surrounded by the worse gravel roads.
GM put a full belly pan on this bus, right to the rear bumper. While the body had the aerodynamics of a brick, it got remarkable fuel mileage, which I attribute to the full belly pan. The log book showed that through its 680,000 mile life, at which time I purchased it, it never got less than 10 mpg. At 27,000lbs., that translates to 135 miles per gallon per ton! I can honestly say that I rarely had a problem keeping up with traffic.
So U.S. engineers could achieve 135miles per gallon per ton 60 years ago back in 1955, but today it's a dream for the distant future.
Citroen introduced its DS model in 1954. This car introduced radial ply tires, disk brakes and a central hydraulic system for suspension, steering and brakes. It had front wheel drive with inboard disk brakes for minimum unsprung weight and did its braking through it CV driveshafts. For many years its rugged transaxle and driveshafts were used in formula 1 cars. It had a very efficient aerodynamic design with particular attention to its smooth under-belly. After all most of the drag is between the bottom of the car and the road as that is where the maximum air shear occurs. It seems current automotive engineers don't realize this. Citroen uses a wind tunnel with a conveyor belt floor for its drag measurements.
The DS had amazing interior room. At 6'4" I could wear a hat in the front and back seats. With the front seat back for my long legs, I still had room in the back seat to cross my legs. It's hydro-pneumatic suspension was the ultimate in smoothness and the handling even over the roughest gravel roads was spellbinding. I got much better mileage than a WV beetle of the day.
The thing that amazes me the most though is its weight at 2700 lbs in the Pallas version. To put that in perspective, a current Fiat 500 weighs in at 2600 lbs. My current Buick Lucerne, with aluminum hood, aluminum suspension, engine, transaxle and all the other "lightweight technology" of today weighs in at 4035lbs. The Buick Lucerne doesn't have the inside room of the Citroen DS and GM's magnetic ride, though the best available these days, is not as smooth.
It still amazes me how a 60 year old design can put "modern" designs to shame in so many ways.
Thanks, j-allen, I tend to agree. Although the steel guys have come out with several AHSS alternatives. Many of the larger auto lightweighting efforts are focused on figuring out which material best goes where, and how they can all--or many of them--play together.
I wish it were true that it was simply a matter of stylists taking over that shifted automotive design towards so much standardization, but that's a secondary effect. The main reason for that change was because of the need to keep volumes high and therefore individual car prices down, while continuing to include new technology with new models.
It is gratifying that auto makers no longer see steel as the solution to virtually every one of the hundreds of structrual problems in automobiles. Such thinking, however, is not new. I have restored and worked on cars from the 1920s. These used a light of light strong materials including aluminum wood, and fabrics. For example, the doors used thin aluminum over a hardwood frame to give a lignt strong structure. Similarly widnow posts were thin steel fromed around softwoods which prevented the hollow struicture from buckling.
On the fancier cars, the engine block was aluminum with iron cylinder sleeves.
Before stylists took over, engineers were able to pick the best designs and materials for each component. It is time to get back to that, especially with the new range of materials now available.
Lou, I agree. My headline was a bit tongue in cheek, since there are other groups working on this general problem. I thought it was interesting, though, that so many formed within a short period of time, and that these seem to be more tightly focused than some of the larger efforts. Like you, I also found the software angle very interesting. The material information databases are clearly a key part of redesigning from heavier structures to lighter ones, whether that's metal-to-plastic, or heavier metals to lighter metals.
Ann, it is good to see the automotive industry finally go on a diet. The initiatives you detail are very interesting and important. After becoming lighter and more aerodynamic, personal automobiles became blockier and heavier with the popularity of SUVs. It looks like now technology is providing the solution.
I also find it interesting that the simulation and CAD information is a major part of these efforts. That's a testament to the current importantce of CAE.
As the 3D printing and overall additive manufacturing ecosystem grows, standards and guidelines from standards bodies and government organizations are increasing. Multiple players with multiple needs are also driving the role of 3DP and AM as enabling technologies for distributed manufacturing.
A growing though not-so-obvious role for 3D printing, 4D printing, and overall additive manufacturing is their use in fabricating new materials and enabling new or improved manufacturing and assembly processes. Individual engineers, OEMs, university labs, and others are reinventing the technology to suit their own needs.
For vehicles to meet the 2025 Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, three things must happen: customers must look beyond the data sheet and engage materials supplier earlier, and new integrated multi-materials are needed to make step-change improvements.
3D printing, 4D printing, and various types of additive manufacturing (AM) will get even bigger in 2015. We're not talking about consumer use, which gets most of the attention, but processes and technologies that will affect how design engineers design products and how manufacturing engineers make them. For now, the biggest industries are still aerospace and medical, while automotive and architecture continue to grow.
More and more -- that's what we'll see from plastics and composites in 2015, more types of plastics and more ways they can be used. Two of the fastest-growing uses will be automotive parts, plus medical implants and devices. New types of plastics will include biodegradable materials, plastics that can be easily recycled, and some that do both.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.