HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Engineering Materials

Lockheed & RedEye Team to 3D-Print Rocket Fuel Tanks

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/3  >  >>
Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Really impressed
Ann R. Thryft   6/19/2014 12:34:57 PM
NO RATINGS
I sure wouldn't want to be that pilot, Mr. Wirtel.
As a reminder, the $250K and 6 months figures were estimates of how long it would take to make multiple functioning prototypes via traditional machining. These two 3D-printed versions cost about half that much--so around $125K--and took less time.



Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Really impressed
Cabe Atwell   6/18/2014 11:12:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree you ttemple, I think the tanks are part of a feasibility study on if they could be manufactured that way. 

Mr. Wirtel
User Rank
Gold
Re: Really impressed
Mr. Wirtel   6/18/2014 8:30:32 PM
NO RATINGS
@Ann: Not to mention the fact that someone will have to pilot that craft and I find it hard to believe anyone could convince a crew that something printed and glued together is perfectly safe for space travel.

Mr. Wirtel
User Rank
Gold
Re: Really impressed
Mr. Wirtel   6/18/2014 8:26:41 PM
NO RATINGS
@Dave: The first number that jumped out at me was the $250,000 for nonfunctioning prototypes. That certainly sounds like entirely too much. Then again it is government work and no need to turn a profit or justify expenses.

bobjengr
User Rank
Platinum
LOOKHEED & REDEYE
bobjengr   6/13/2014 5:35:26 PM
NO RATINGS
This is definitely the purpose "additive" manufacturing is finding new uses every month if not every week.  Some years ago I worked for a company that designed and sold ASME Section IV Boilers.  The most critical design was the end caps and insertion of those end caps into the body of the vessel.  I'm not surprised the fabrication took 150 hours.  Think of the tooling dollars saved due to the process.  I also would love to know the adhesive used for the prototypes and if any pressure testing was conducted.  For the ASME vessels, the working pressure was 150 PSI with a test pressure of 300 PSI.  I'm sure that is not the case here.  Great post Ann.  These just shows how the technology is improving and progressing each year.  This is a great "marriage" also and one I'm sure will be lasting. 

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Really impressed
Ann R. Thryft   6/4/2014 12:07:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Liz, considering that such tanks have already been made with composites, and that aerospace is one of the leading sectors pushing production parts in 3D printing, it's quite possible these will be produced by 3D printing in the future.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Really impressed
Elizabeth M   6/4/2014 5:55:20 AM
NO RATINGS
You are probably right, Ann, to have your doubts. And until all those doubts are eased, and the production becomes foolproof, it's best to leave this type of thing to prototypes and models, especially when hazardous substances are involved. But with the advancements in metal 3D printing that seem to be increasing, perhaps eventually this will change.

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Really impressed
Cabe Atwell   6/3/2014 7:50:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree you ttemple, I think the tanks are part of a feasibility study on if they could be manufactured that way. 

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Really impressed
Ann R. Thryft   6/3/2014 1:23:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Liz, I also wondered, like Lou, if that isn't possible. Although we have seen huge composite rocket fuel tanks, which we wrote about here
http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=1392&doc_id=272890
the non-metallic materials that are 3D printable aren't likely to be up to the job, and I'm doubtful about bonding methods. I'm also not at all sure if either metallic materials or assembly methods for 3D printed parts are, either.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Really impressed
Ann R. Thryft   6/3/2014 1:12:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Lou, I wondered the same thing for the same reasons, but there wasn't any mention of that possibility. Lockheed is still a ways away from final design, though, so they may yet make such an announcement.



Page 1/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Engineering Materials
As the 3D printing and overall additive manufacturing ecosystem grows, standards and guidelines from standards bodies and government organizations are increasing. Multiple players with multiple needs are also driving the role of 3DP and AM as enabling technologies for distributed manufacturing.
A growing though not-so-obvious role for 3D printing, 4D printing, and overall additive manufacturing is their use in fabricating new materials and enabling new or improved manufacturing and assembly processes. Individual engineers, OEMs, university labs, and others are reinventing the technology to suit their own needs.
For vehicles to meet the 2025 Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, three things must happen: customers must look beyond the data sheet and engage materials supplier earlier, and new integrated multi-materials are needed to make step-change improvements.
3D printing, 4D printing, and various types of additive manufacturing (AM) will get even bigger in 2015. We're not talking about consumer use, which gets most of the attention, but processes and technologies that will affect how design engineers design products and how manufacturing engineers make them. For now, the biggest industries are still aerospace and medical, while automotive and architecture continue to grow.
More and more -- that's what we'll see from plastics and composites in 2015, more types of plastics and more ways they can be used. Two of the fastest-growing uses will be automotive parts, plus medical implants and devices. New types of plastics will include biodegradable materials, plastics that can be easily recycled, and some that do both.
Design News Webinar Series
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 26 - 30, IPv6 for Micros – Hands-On
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Stratasys
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service