We know that design engineers are highly involved in selecting both the materials and the suppliers for their designs. But a recent Design News Materials Survey showed that they will be setting the parameters of many designs. Today's engineers have expertise that crosses multiple disciplines, and they're involved in multiple job functions.
A whopping 84 percent of the survey respondents said they determine the type of materials that will be used in their designs, and 64 percent recommend brands and/or vendors. Almost 70 percent make the final decision in selecting materials. When it comes to choosing suppliers, design engineers are doing almost everything except make the final decision; only 31 percent said they're responsible for that. Yet 80 percent specify, recommend, or influence the selection of suppliers, and 61 percent are involved in getting vendors on the approved vendor list (AVL).
Most respondents said their companies maintain an AVL. But vendors must do a lot more than compete on price to get on that list. Quality, performance, and reliability were the top three factors chosen by survey respondents. Price came in sixth, after delivery and previous experience. The emphasis on overall quality jibes with the renewed emphasis on excellence in US manufacturing. And the majority of engineers work in demanding application areas where quality, performance, and reliability are musts: industrial machinery, automotive and trucking, medical and healthcare, military/defense, and aerospace.
This focus on quality also connects with the shifts in the types of materials that engineers plan to use. The number of engineers who said they are increasing the amount of high-performance engineering plastics in their designs was about equal to the number maintaining their amount. Almost as many are boosting amounts of lightweight alloys as those maintaining use levels.
Engineers expect to increase their use in all the categories we asked about: injection molders, composites, ceramics, powder metals, foundries, die casters, specialty alloys, ferrous alloys, adhesives and coatings, standard polymers, engineering polymers, and elastomers. That means a lot of engineers will be considering a lot of new materials and new suppliers. Although injection molders may help them select many of those materials, the design engineer rarely leaves materials and supplier selection entirely up to the molder.
A large majority said their company's manufacturing function helps select materials. But that's only one indication that there's no more throwing it over the wall to someone in a different field of expertise. Most of today's engineers function in multiple disciplines. As product designs are becoming more integrated and pulling together different technologies and disciplines, so are their designers.
For instance, half the respondents work in mechanical engineering, and another 25 percent list that discipline as an additional area of expertise. Only 13 percent listed manufacturing engineering as their primary discipline, but 52 percent said it's a secondary discipline. Similarly, many more engineers listed materials engineering and electromechanical engineering as secondary disciplines than as primary disciplines.
And that's only the beginning. Secondary job functions are also a big part of the design engineer's work environment. In addition to product or system design, half the respondents are involved in R&D, and about the same number are involved in testing and evaluation. About a quarter are also involved in designing equipment for internal use or quality control.
Engineers are outlining design specifications; determining what type of solution they want; evaluating different products, brands, and vendors; and testing materials. Today's design engineers have a strong voice in selecting not only the materials but also the products and the vendors they want to use to turn their designs into reality.
If you'd like to see the entire study, please email me at ann.thryft@ubm.com.
Interesting article, Ann and really great news about the "return to quality" revolution. I am really not surprised at the increasing roles that design engineers are playing in selecting materials. From my past experience, most companies utilize engineering talent wherever it is found, when there is a need to be met. As a test engineer I was on occasion software programmer, hardware designer, product/parts purchaser, fixture designer, software trainer, webmaster, and technical writer...but I also had other engineers to consult with when I was treading in unfamiliar territory.
I think for a design engineer to be able to have a hand in materials selection is a wonderful thing. They have true ownership and experience to back their choices - any engineer that I am acquainted with is multi-disciplined by nature. But I also agree with Dave that their expertise will be limited. The design engineer teamed up with a materials engineer would be the ideal.
Dave, thanks for your input. I was surprised to find out how many design engineers listed materials engineering or manufacturing engineering as a second job function that they were clearly not formally trained in, as well as how many are responsible for determining/deciding on materials.
I am a materials engineer for an outboard engine manufacturer. Sometimes people ask me what part of the engine I'm responsible for. I tell them, "Everything that's made out of anything."
Materials selection is an important task, because everything has to be made out of something. You only need to take a glance at the Made by Monkeys and Sherlock Ohms blogs to see the consequences of making something out of the wrong material.
As Ann's article points out, there are a huge number of considerations that have to be weighed when selecting the proper material for an application. Some companies expect design engineers to be able to take care of materials selection on their own. In my experience, this is both unrealistic and inefficient.
Expecting each individual design engineer to accumulate enough materials knowledge to handle any given situation (in addition to the mechanical, electrical, thermal, CAD, and CAE knowlege they need) is unreasonable. With the exception of a few rare geniuses, most people are simply not capable of being experts in all of these disciplines. Besides, there is simply not enough time in a 24-hour day. Having one or more degreed and experienced materials engineers, preferably with a well-equipped materials lab, is far more efficient.
For companies that can't afford this, seeking out a materials engineering consultant may be a good investment. The cost of doing so may be far less than the cost of making something out of the wrong material.
Very interesting survey results, Ann. With the renewed focus on manufacturing excellence and quality, it makes sense that engineers can no longer make decisions in silos. Also, today's competitive products don't just demand the least expensive materials, but the most efficient and cost effective materials. There's definitely a difference.
Based on the sentiments that the survey bore out, it's heartening to see the design tool vendors keeping up, offering capabilities that can help leverage simulation as a means of exploring optimal materials choices as well as serving up tighter integration with manufacturing and sourcing systems as part of breaking down silos.
The 100-percent solar-powered Solar Impulse plane flies on a piloted, cross-country flight this summer over the US as a prelude to the longer, round-the-world flight by its successor aircraft planned for 2015.
GE Aviation expects to chop off about 25 percent of the total 3D printing time of metallic production components for its LEAP Turbofan engine, using in-process inspection. That's pretty amazing, considering how slow additive manufacturing (AM) build times usually are.
A $1,500, hand-operated, bench-model, plastic injection machine crowdsource-funded via Kickstarter can be used to mold small, quality, plastic parts inexpensively, on demand.
The federal government is launching competitions to kickstart three more manufacturing innovation institutes, including one focused on Lightweight and Modern Metals Manufacturing Innovation.
The airframe of Airbus's A350 XWB consists of a bigger proportion of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite structures than any other commercial jet to date: over 53 percent by weight.
From Dell / Intel® New Paradigms in Design Work Scott Hamilton, vertical market strategist for Dell Precision workstations, 5/2/2013 5
Early in my career, I worked as a draftsman and remember the days of drawing on vellum with numbered pencils and Mylar with plastic lead. This was a fun experience in the sense that I ...
I've been using workstations for more than 10 years and love finding ways to get more performance from my system. With demanding professional applications that require more power each ...
A lasting memory from my first job as an engineer in an auto assembly plant is standing on hard concrete at six in the morning, vending-machine coffee clutched in hand, listening to ...
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This radio show will show what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.
To save this item to your list of favorite Design News content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Tweet This
16 
