HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
Blogs
Engineering Materials

China Teams With Boeing to Increase Aircraft Production

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/3  >  >>
Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: A little leery
Dave Palmer   4/7/2012 11:30:50 AM
NO RATINGS
@naperlou: I agree that the main motivation for Boeing and Bombardier to do this is to help them sell aircraft in China. What's wrong with that? As I pointed out, this may help create jobs in the U.S. and Canada.

As to R&D, I don't think anyone would argue that U.S. doctors are somehow impeded in looking for a cure for cancer if Chinese doctors are also looking for one. Why should it be any different when it comes to trying to find ways to make air transportation more fuel efficient?

When it comes to Chinese materials, I've definitely seen off-spec materials from China. But I've also seen off-spec materials from the U.S. If you buy the cheapest materials you can find, no matter what country they come from, you shouldn't expect the highest quality. The bottom of the barrel is the bottom of the barrel. But it would be a faulty generalization to say that all Chinese materials are low-quality.  It would be more correct to say that you get what you pay for.  

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little leery
naperlou   4/7/2012 12:42:56 AM
NO RATINGS
@Dave Plamer: The main reason to do this type of thing in China is to get preference for our compnaies, like Boeing, in China.  If a company like Boeing, with its vast number of engineers and scientists, needs R&D help, then we are in trouble.  Perhaps we are made stronger in the long run becuase of our flexibilty as a country, but we often suffer dislocations in the short run. 

I am a little leary of materials from China.  I talked to one guy who got ball bearings from China (through a distributor) which were not hard enough.  They wore out quickly.  This lost him at least one customer.  In another instance, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) has $1.1 Billion worth of trains that they cannot use.  They were built by Bombardier who got some of the structural steel from China.  It does not meet spec.  In fact, it is dangereous.  Fortunately it was found in acceptance testing, not operation.  I have seen lots of other examples recently.  That is why I would be leary of having Chinese materials in an airliner.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little leery
Rob Spiegel   4/5/2012 2:30:20 PM
NO RATINGS
That's a good point, Dave. A collaboration with China doesn't necessarily mean there will be negative blow-back in the U.S. A U.S. company like Boeing could be the beneficiary of R&D from China. I would imagzine there is some significant gain or Beoing would not have entered into the deal.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little leery
Ann R. Thryft   4/4/2012 5:13:09 PM
NO RATINGS

Dave, I agree that advancing knowledge and technology is in the interests of all, at least in theory. I think it stops being in everyone's interest when we start looking at who controls what. I also don't think this is just a "shoe's on the other foot" situation in terms of comparing what China's doing now to anything we've done in the past and how unfair or wrong that may have been. The thing is, we're now in a vastly shrunken world in terms of the entanglement of everyone in everyone else's economy and how everyone's economy and technology decisions affect everyone else's. (Interesting that you mentioned Alcoa--they seemed to have had a potential aluminum-lithium deal going with COMAC for a few years and then all mention of it disappears sometime in 2011).


Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: A little leery
Dave Palmer   4/4/2012 11:03:19 AM
NO RATINGS
@Ann: I'm with you when it comes to companies sending manufacturing jobs to China in order to take advantage of low labor costs.  And I agree that the practices of many Chinese companies are deplorable -- although maybe not too different from the practices of many U.S. companies during our own period of rapid industrialization in the late 1800s and early 1900s.  But this article is not really about that.

Bombardier seems to see its collaboration with COMAC as a way to generate orders for its CSeries aircraft, which so far it has had a hard time selling.  If Bombardier is successful in getting the CSeries into the Chinese domestic air travel market, this would almost certainly create jobs in Quebec and Northern Ireland, where the CSeries is built.  It would presumably also create jobs in Pennsylvania and Indiana, where Alcoa makes the aluminum-lithium alloys which are used in the CSeries.

I suspect that Boeing has similar goals in its collaboration with COMAC, although their collaboration seems to be more focused on basic research.

Clearly, companies are in business to make money, not to advance national interests. (Which, in Bombardier's case, would be Canadian interests, not U.S. interests). But, in this case, I think advancing knowledge and technology is in everyone's interest.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little leery
Ann R. Thryft   4/4/2012 9:45:52 AM
NO RATINGS
Dave, I agree that the world doesn't revolve around the US anymore--that's getting truer all the time. But that said, for those of us in the US, we do have valid concerns about keeping our IP under our control. We also have valid concerns about Chinese manufacturing quality-- not just what they can do but what they do do--and shipping yet more of our jobs overseas, especially high-paid ones. Like sensor pro, I am very wary of so-called global collaboration: companies like Boeing may benefit from it, but citizens--aka workers--in the US so far have not.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A little leery
Ann R. Thryft   4/4/2012 9:44:36 AM
NO RATINGS
Well said, tekochip. I would add, not only does the US have a strong presence in aerospace and commercial aircraft in particular, but those are also well-paying jobs.

sensor pro
User Rank
Gold
Re: A little leery
sensor pro   4/3/2012 9:59:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I really hope so. Due to my previous experience with "global cooperation" I lost confidence in these projects. I found that some countries have a trust issue, and China is one of them.

Lets hope for the best. We can agree on that.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: A little leery
Dave Palmer   4/3/2012 8:48:12 PM
NO RATINGS
@sensorpro: The article doesn't say that the 787 will be partially made or developed in China.  The article mentions that one of the areas of collaboration is lightweight alloys, and the 787 is given as an example of a Boeing aircraft where lightweight alloys are used.

By all means, let's have more R&D in the U.S.  But that doesn't mean that companies shouldn't do R&D in China also.  It's entirely possible that some of the technologies developed at the Boeing-COMAC center may eventually create jobs in the U.S.  

sensor pro
User Rank
Gold
Re: A little leery
sensor pro   4/3/2012 7:55:54 PM
NO RATINGS
My point had nothing to do with who works on Aluminum or anything else for that affect. We are too open with out technology. What I'm saying is that our govenment created over 15% unemployment, basically crippled NASA, has engineers working in landscaping, while California purchases Billions of steel from China. Parts of planes are made in China and Korea. Eight or six solar power companies are chapter 11 due to missmanagement, fraud and due to unreasonably low panel prices from China.

And now we are "happy" that 787 will be partially made or developed in China.

Did I miss anything?!

 

Take that money and hire our guys and develop it inhouse. Am I wrong ?

 

 

Page 1/3  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs from Engineering Materials
3D printing has met up with drones in a 3D-printed UAV. University of Sheffield engineers printed the prototype drone in 24 hours from ABS plastic using Fused Deposition Modeling.
Some of the biggest self-assembled building blocks and structures made from engineered DNA have been developed by researchers at Harvard's Wyss Institute. The largest, a hexagonal prism, is one-tenth the size of an average bacterium.
Arevo Labs' end-production 3D printing technology for carbon composites includes a high-temperature, filament fusion printer head design and firmware for use with the company's new carbon fiber and nanotube reinforced high-temperature matrix polymers like PEEK.
Stratasys will buy Solid Concepts and Harvest Technologies and combine them with its RedEye service business. The plan takes aim at end-production manufacturing and will create one of the biggest commercial 3D printing and AM service bureaus.
The International Federation of Robotics reports that global sales of industrial robots decreased by 4% in 2012 over 2011. The biggest hit was electrical/electronics manufacturing, down by 13%; but by region, the Amerficas did well.
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service