An Ohio company that offers document services is entering the in-mold labeling market with what might be a major technology play. Competitive in-mold offerings generally use identical materials such as polycarbonate label with a polycarbonate part or a polystyrene label with polystyrene part. Compatible melt indexes are critical, creating complications when a plastic is highly filled. “A lot of work goes into matching the like label with a part to insure it bonds well and looks good,” says David Coughlin, director of operations of Industramark, which is being introduced at the National Plastics Exposition this week in Chicago. “This truly is a challenge and a good part of the reason why in-mold labels have not taken off outside of prime labeling applications that are typically only polypropylene.” Working with Fusion Graphics, also of Dayton, OH, Industramark has developed a 7 mil micro porous film. “We do not depend on like chemistries for bonding but rather the plastic (any thermoplastic) being molded flows into the micro bonds and makes a permanent bond to the label. Based on our relationship with Fusion Graphics and their patent position, we have a novel solution that makes other in-mold products obsolete and very complex.”
Labels are not new to Industramark’s parent, Standard Register. They accounted for 13 percent of revenues last year. In response to a question from Design News, Industramark did not provide information on the material used for its in mold labels. A patent awarded to Robert Freund of Waynesville, OH in 2007 describes a new IML technique based on a precipitated silica-filled microporous sheet material. If properly coated, the material is well suited to the IML task, according to the patent. The novel system also requires special inks. The technique is said to not only to improve quality of graphic images, but also to cost less. A wide range of materials, including thermosets, can be used.
A new service lets engineers and orthopedic surgeons design and 3D print highly accurate, patient-specific, orthopedic medical implants made of metal -- without owning a 3D printer. Using free, downloadable software, users can import ASCII and binary .STL files, design the implant, and send an encrypted design file to a third-party manufacturer.
A recent report sponsored by the American Chemistry Council (ACC) focuses on emerging gasification technologies for converting waste into energy and fuel on a large scale and saving it from the landfill. Some of that waste includes non-recycled plastic.
Capping a 30-year quest, GE Aviation has broken ground on the first high-volume factory for producing commercial jet engine components from ceramic matrix composites. The plant will produce high-pressure turbine shrouds for the LEAP Turbofan engine.
Seismic shifts in 3D printing materials include an optimization method that reduces the material needed to print an object by 85 percent, research designed to create new, stronger materials, and a new ASTM standard for their mechanical properties.
A recent study finds that 3D printing is both cheaper and greener than traditional factory-based mass manufacturing and distribution. At least, it's true for making consumer plastic products on open-source, low-cost RepRap printers.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.