There’s no question the American mold industry has taken a battering from imports in recent years. But there’s a new report just out from the China Die & Mould Industry Association that may surprise Yankee toolmakers. Mold imports into China actually surpassed mold exports by $300 million in 2006! Chinese domestic production of molds rose to $3.1 billion in value in 2006, but still only accounted for 74 per cent of domestic supply. The Chinese, however, are not complaining about their mold imports. In fact, the imports are desperately needed to meet expanding demand and high technology requirements. “Plastic mold producers should develop large size, high-precision and complicated molds with high technical content and longer lifecycle,” comments Zhou Yonghai, vice secretary general of the CDMIA. Chinese mold makers “are still far behind” in precision, cavity surface finish, production cycle and life cycle, says Yonghai. Foreign companies, such as Nypro, operate leading-edge mold shops in China, but most Chinese shops lag behind. The Chinese system of traditional state ownership and collective ownership “cannot deal with these challenges”, says the association leader. There’s a tremendous lack of qualified professionals. Meanwhile, prices for molds are dropping while costs of materials, energy and labor are rising. Those last two points sound all too familiar.
What does it mean to design engineers?
Well if you want to take an ambitious product development project to China, you’d better take your tool makers with you.
A recent report sponsored by the American Chemistry Council (ACC) focuses on emerging gasification technologies for converting waste into energy and fuel on a large scale and saving it from the landfill. Some of that waste includes non-recycled plastic.
Capping a 30-year quest, GE Aviation has broken ground on the first high-volume factory for producing commercial jet engine components from ceramic matrix composites. The plant will produce high-pressure turbine shrouds for the LEAP Turbofan engine.
Seismic shifts in 3D printing materials include an optimization method that reduces the material needed to print an object by 85 percent, research designed to create new, stronger materials, and a new ASTM standard for their mechanical properties.
A recent study finds that 3D printing is both cheaper and greener than traditional factory-based mass manufacturing and distribution. At least, it's true for making consumer plastic products on open-source, low-cost RepRap printers.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.