According to a blog by Gary Nevison in the Electronics Weekly on December 20, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced a public consultation, running until the end of January around the proposed rule implementing annual reporting requirements regarding conflict minerals in manufactured products. These are required under Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
There are several elements within the proposed rules where the SEC is seeking public opinion:
SEC proposes no definition of when a conflict mineral is “necessary to the functionality or production of a product”
Companies stating that they do not use minerals from the Congo must briefly describe the process they applied to arrive at this conclusion and maintain appropriate business records
Companies who use such materials or who are not sure would have to provide a Conflict Mineral Report as part of their annual report, including a certified private sector audit
SEC proposes the need for due diligence when making supply chain determinations but does not provide guidance on what constitutes due diligence
SEC proposes different treatment of conflict minerals from recycled or scrap sources than for mined sources
SEC estimates a total increase in the paperwork burden for all affected companies to be over 150,000 hours of personnel time plus in the region of $70 million for external professional services. In addition each private sector audit could cost around $25,000
Disclosure requirements apply to all companies that file reports with the SEC under the Act including domestic companies, foreign private companies, with no exemptions for SME’s
SEC proposes no definition of “manufacturer” although requirements will not apply to retailers who sell third party products
The SEC seeks public comments on the above and others.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.