HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Blog
CADFusion Built Around Motion Control
1/28/2013

CADFusion takes incoming drawings into defined shapes and entities.   (Source: CADFusion)
CADFusion takes incoming drawings into defined shapes and entities.
(Source: CADFusion)

Return to Article

View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/2
ronrek
User Rank
Bronze
Re: Looks like junk
ronrek   1/29/2013 11:50:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Aeorech makes their own controllers that run G-Code. This product was developed to output specifclly for these controllers as a direct response to customer requests for a tool that could utilize all the functionality of these control platfroms without having to configure post prcessor settings on a thrid party application. 

It is normally sold as part of a system that includes the controller, motors and drives.  Pricing is provided as part of that package. 

mtripoli3
User Rank
Gold
Looks like junk
mtripoli3   1/29/2013 10:46:04 AM
NO RATINGS
I try not to be so harsh, but this looks like junk. Off the top of my head, the first question I have to ask is "Who's G-code?". In other words, there is a post processor (PP) that needs to compile the G-code in the "flavor" for the machine it's to run on. So, does this software have some way to create/modify the PP? The website for the product gives almost no information, and at this stage of the game anyone that doesn't openly publish the price for the product is missing the boat. 

If you are looking for "real" tools to do this job, have a look at the offerings from Vectric: http://www.vectric.com. They have a ton of info on their site, offer free trial software and publish the prices for everything they have. I have personally used VCarve Pro, Cut2D and Cut3D. These are fantastic tools and do exactly what they say. I built a custom 2.5D machine and use this software as the "front end". Amazingly easy to use and you can create your own PP (or use one the 100's available for standard machines).

ttemple
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Cost
ttemple   1/29/2013 9:36:24 AM
NO RATINGS
From the information on their website, the product does not look comparable to even the most simplistic CAM programs.  Maybe the website leaves a lot out, but I don't see any way to define tool geometry.  I would consider that essential to any CAM program that is going to be used for machining.  I see references to laser, which is the most simplistic case of cutting (zero cutter diameter, can only cut profiles).

To do machining, the software must be aware of the cutter geometry so that it can offset the path for the size of the tool.  This is somewhat trivial in the case of 2d profiling, but it is non-trivial in the case of 3d contouring.  The shape and size of the cutter must be taken into account by the CAM software to generate the correct cutter path.  The ability to "offset" the stock to allow for roughing and finishing cuts is also pretty essential for CAM programs.  Again, somewhat trivial in 2d, not so trivial in 3d.

This software appears to be a way to generate 2d paths based upon dxf files for relatively simple situations, such as laser or waterjet cutting, glue dispensing, etc. where the "tool" follows the exact dimensions of the drawing.  I don't see it as being useful for milling if it doesn't allow cutter geometry to be entered.

Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
Cost
Greg M. Jung   1/28/2013 11:00:01 PM
NO RATINGS
What would be the retail price for this product and how does this price compare with their competitors (price vs. features/performance).  I'm assuming that CADFusion bringing increased functionality to a new price point.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
CADFusion Motion Control
apresher   1/28/2013 4:48:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Motion vendors like Aerotech have been generating G code programming for their motion systems for a long time, but this looks like it takes it to another levels in terms of the user interface and flexibility/functionality. Cabe, you'll have to let us know how it works on your test system.

ttemple
User Rank
Platinum
How is this different from CAM software?
ttemple   1/28/2013 10:07:59 AM
NO RATINGS
Cabe,

How is this different from all of the other CAM programs out there?  It looks like a minimally functional CAM program.

I use Visual Mill, but there are many other programs that convert popular drawing formats into cutterpath data.

Does Aerotech's product allow cutter geometry to be factored in?  I don't see the use for something that just converts a drawing file to motion without requiring the cutter context, and/or the design intent to be conveyed to the software.  That is, how does the the software know whether I want to mill the surface, or drill holes, or mill the edge, etc.

CAM software allows for cutter dimensions, and design intent to be factored in when generating cutterpath.  Many other factors are controllable as well, such as entry and exit paths, reversal methods, feeds, speeds, stock offsets, etc.

There is a product called Feature CAM out there that I saw demonstrated years ago.  It had an interesting feature, in that it would take a solid model, and a tooling database, and attempt to completely machine the part with no other input from the user.  If it had to drill holes, and didn't have the right size drill, it would pocket mill the hole if it had a suitable end mill.  It did a pretty good job of creating all of the necessary machining operations with minimal input.  It had a built in knowledge base of speeds, feeds, materials, etc. which it drew on to create the machining operations.

I use Visual Mill, which I consider to be a very good "value".  It has very high end features, and a modest cost, as compared to the typical high end CAM programs.  At the time I purchased it, it was one of the few programs that was actually completely "Windows".  Others were migrating to Windows by using DOS shell type methods to make older software run under Windows.

<<  <  Page 2/2
Partner Zone
More Blogs
Bigger than an iPhone 6 Plus, but smaller than an iPad Air 2. What am I? If you answered iPad Mini 3, you are correct.
Here are 10 robots that are designed to work effectively and safely with humans.
What if you could recharge your mobile device using the movements you make all day? That’s the promise of Ampy, a new device by a Chicago-based startup of the same name.
What's lighter than Air? An Air 2. Join us as we disassemble the new, shaved-down iPad Air 2, and see whether Apple's thinnest device is still its least-repairable.
Think there’s already a high bar in owning a Ferrari? Well, grab a pole vault, because that bar just got raised.
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Nov 3 - 7, Engineering Principles behind Advanced User Interface Technologies
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service