Lack of Qualified Engineering Candidates

View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/6  >  >>
User Rank
Re: train them yourself
ttemple   10/24/2012 7:55:11 AM
" I think you dismiss PhDs a bit too swiftly in too general a manner."

Point taken.  I didn't mean to be swift and general in dismissing PhD's.  I was really trying to make the point not to be swift and general in dismissing non-PhD's, and even non BS's.

I believe a lot of productive talent is overlooked by indiscriminately filtering candidates by degrees.  There are many people who have the raw material to be very good engineers, but they don't have the guidance around them, or the financial resources to seek the "appropriate" education.  They might, however, find their way get through a 2 year program at a tech school.  I think our current HR structure overlooks these people (by "degree as a litmus test" practices), and does so to the detriment of everyone involved.

If you need a PhD because of the nature of the position, by all means, look for a PhD to fill the position.  Most work that needs to be done doesn't need to be done by PhD's, however.

I completely agree with your differentiation between PhD's who only went to school, and those who went back after/during work.


User Rank
impedance of 10 volt ideal votage sourse in parallel with a 5 Ohm resister
charles76   10/24/2012 9:28:34 AM
You never specified that you were asking about the votge source.  I answered the 

impedance for the whole circuit which is 5 ohms.


Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Re: Expectations and Capabilities
Beth Stackpole   10/24/2012 9:34:15 AM
I like your approach, Greg. Candidates should definitely have a core understanding of the foundational principles and theories, and sure, a co-op and hands-on practical experience is a huge plus. But those coming out of school likely aren't going to have deep expertise in many of the skills needed in today's jobs. Yet as long as they demonstrate a hunger to learn and a willingness to role up their sleeves and dive right in, I think that's half the battle. I think some coming out of college have expectations that they don't have to start at the bottom and work their way up through hard work and hands-on training. They want the big job right out of school and all the perks that go with it.

User Rank
Look at extra-curricular activities
GTOlover   10/24/2012 9:34:49 AM
I also look for hobbies on resumes when I have to interview. I still do the testing and the interview, but I sometimes look at a weaker resume because the candidate may have listed a useful hobby. As you can tell by my screen name I tend to be partial to car guys. But this also translates into a person who has some basic hands-on skills that may not always be related to the target job. But hobbies are usually self taught or mentored. This means the person can learn!

User Rank
Poorly worded question
TunaFish#5   10/24/2012 9:34:56 AM
I'd've answered 5 ohms, and I'd've defended it.

Who in the world has ever been presented with a situation:

You have and ideal voltage source and circuit Y.  What is the <characteristic>?

Where the question about <characteristic> applies to the ideal voltage source?

... Unless, of course, you're in a conversation about ideal voltage sources.

Otherwise, all the other 100s of coursework situations that were tossed at me were about circuit Y.

My mental process for problem solving is, "'Ideal' = Hit the 'I beleve' button for the voltage source and focus on circuit Y."

Am I the odd man out here?  I think not.  And I think the phrasing+answer makes this the interviewer's equivalent of a sucker's bet.

and if someone want to harp on distinguishing impendance from resistence, then just toss 0j (or 0i, depending on your religion) at them.

User Rank
Sick question
ChasChas   10/24/2012 9:46:51 AM

Ideal is for theory and teaching the basic math. It has little value in real life except for a quick estimate.

It's like asking a doctor how a patient in perfect health can show symtoms of a cold.  (A person in perfect health can have no ill symtoms.)

Sick question.

User Rank
re: Lack of Qualified Candidates
jonnk   10/24/2012 9:51:52 AM
I am not too sympathetic to corporate world complaints of lack of qualified personnel.  It is not neccessarily true that the point of college education is to support the corporate world.   People go to college for a variety of reasons.   The corporate world basically bailed out on training and developing people after the '90s.   Besides, like everything else in business, it's all relative to competition.   Hire the best people available for your purposes based on a comprehensive evaluation, not trick questions.  If you are more successful at getting the best candidates than your competitiion,  you will benefit in the free market. 

User Rank
Re: Poorly worded question
didymus7   10/24/2012 9:57:38 AM
I have to agree here.  The question is not specific enough for engineering.  You might have well have been asking "Where did they bury the survivors..."

The purpose of the interview is not to see how well the candidate guesses, but how well they think.

I put together a test of 20 questions for an engineering candidate.  However, the purpose was not to give a piece of paper to the applicant and walk away, but to sit there with them and have them talk out their thought process for each question.  I never graded the test on right answers but how they were thinking.  Sure, we're all too busy to do this, but if you want to find a good candidate, you have to put some work into it.  It's either that or hope you get lucky.

The problem with onesy questions like this is that they get out and then everybody, even the biggest idiot, knows the answer.  Don't go for the answer, go for the thought process.

User Rank
OLD_CURMUDGEON   10/24/2012 10:17:40 AM
LO!, all those decades ago when I was but a high school graduate preparing for my college experience, a sage (uncle) once told me something that I've NEVER forgotten ..... "the fundamental purpose of a college education is to teach you to THINK!"  (He told me some other things too, but I can't repeat them in mixed company! Ha! Ha!)

I-B-M thought so much of this concept of thinking that for a long time they distributed throughout their facilities various-sized desk ornaments w/ the one word, "THINK" inscribed on the brass placard.  And, anyone in this audience who is old enough should remember seeing photos of the I-B-M 360 main console w/ the THINK placard proudly displayed on the top surface.

Nothing else needs to be said!  I rest my case!

User Rank
A missed opportunity
RBedell   10/24/2012 10:19:30 AM
Working in at a university, on research equipment, it is not always possible to know the answers to every question.  When I became a 'working' manager of engineering support, I expanded my skill set by taking classes in supervision and management.  Terrified at the prospect of being in charge of hiring someone, I applied my skills of troubleshooting and studied the interview process, asked peers a lot of questions, and learned a few do and don't s.  The first hire was tragic.  But I learned a lot.  The second hire was a hit.

The questioned posed by Richard Nass' friend is a very good one, if you are looking at a bigger picture.  I agree with other comments that the question is very unusual and not everyone would know the answer - the question is not well defined: 'What is the impedance?'  The impedance of what? the voltage source?  The circuit?

But I like this question and may use it myself.  Why?  When an engineer becomes a manager, not all but most, they apply what they know and interpret as important. And that is technical expertise in engineering.  But that is not all there is to hiring someone.  Keeping it short; Other important factors are compatibility with others, communications, stress response, etc. If the interviewee gave the answer the interviewer was looking for then all one knows is the desired answer was given.  But, more can be learned about the interviewee if they do not know the answer; or give the wrong answer, are told the answer that was expected.  How?  Watch the person; do they become nervous(uncertain) or remain confident; argue the answer or discuss it; is there answer full of BS or a thought out 'I don't know'.

Where I work, the range of diverse information/knowledge that is needed is not likely to be found off the street.  So, I look for drive, motivation, open mindedness, communication without argumentation (I want credit for that phrase), a willingness to learn...  I would use this question, not as an engineering question, but as a rhetorical question.  It is not the answer to the question that I would be interested in, especially if the knew my answer.  It is their response to it when they don't know my answer.

Apply your diagnostic and troubleshooting skills to the interview process and explore new applications for those skills.  Great engineers don't have to know everything.

<<  <  Page 2/6  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs
At ARM TechCon 2016, CEO Simon Segars will discuss how he sees billions of devices scaling to trillions as IoT applications proliferate. We know it’s happening. How do we prepare?
Highly regarded engineer and physicist Ransom Stephens speaks with Design News about his extensive science and engineering background, the serious yet funny study of neuroscience, and how one primes their brain for innovation.
It's your turn to cast your vote for one of these 12 finalists to win the ARM TechCon Reader's Choice Award for the most innovative product of the past year.
While supercapacitors and rechargeable Lithium-ion batteries both store energy, these two technologies are very different in their design and in their performance capabilities.
The Internet of Things is at an important and exciting tipping point in its evolution. ARM exec Ian Ferguson shares his perspective.
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 10 - 14, Embedded System Design Techniques™: Getting Started Developing Professional Embedded Software
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9 | 10

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course September 27-29:
Sponsored by 3M
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service