HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Blogs
Blog
Can Your iPhone Bring Down a Plant?
6/28/2013

A layout of the new networked plant.
A layout of the new networked plant.

Return to Article

View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/7  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/9/2013 7:52:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Ann, vendors from companies like Rockwell and Siemens say that this arrangement has effectively solved the problem of the conflict between control and IT. The goal apparently is for everyone to take the side of the company and not the side of control or IT.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Rob Spiegel   8/5/2013 10:36:24 AM
NO RATINGS

Good point. But if that means shutting down the plant unscheduled, that can run into considerable dollars.

Digerati Ohm
User Rank
Silver
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Digerati Ohm   8/5/2013 9:23:52 AM
NO RATINGS
Sometimes it is important to install patches in a timely manner, particularly if a new expoit is a zero day.  So it boils down to this:
A hacker or an exploit takes down your plant.  Who are the executives and shareholders going to lynch, IS or the plant management?  I can tell you it will be IS, and the argument will be that IS didn't explain the urgency clearly enough (which they did, but were ignored), and that IS is ultimately responsible for computer security.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/2/2013 7:35:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Cabe, this problem will grow as plants continue to shift to wireless devices. It's one thing to protect a wired network, but a wireless network is even more vulnerable. Wireless is attractive because is costs less and you can put a device in places where it's hard to run wire.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Rob Spiegel   8/2/2013 7:19:53 PM
NO RATINGS
One of the clashes between control and IT is that IT wants to update the patches more often than control has scheduled downtime. So, to meet IT's desired updating, control would have to shut down the plant more often.

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-3 levels to the plant
Cabe Atwell   7/31/2013 7:16:56 PM
NO RATINGS
No system is 100% safe even with safeguard protocols in place. I expect the problem to continue to grow as mobile devices become more powerful in terms of tech.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   7/26/2013 9:30:57 AM
NO RATINGS
I see your point, AnandY. The mandates of IT and control are absolute. For IT, no security breaches. For control, no downtime. I've heard vendors talk of peace between the two when a committee is set up to solve these issues and both IT and control are represented on the committee.

Digerati Ohm
User Rank
Silver
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Digerati Ohm   7/26/2013 9:15:37 AM
NO RATINGS
At least when IT takes down services to install patches, it should be a scheduled maintenance period.  Hackers don't care about schedules.  I'd rather have a scheduled downtime to install patches than unscheduled downtime because I couldn't.  But as I read the article it emphasizes the trend that users are pushing technology into the work environment without understanding the implications.  IT must have time to evaluate the risk and do what they can to minimize it.  If it cannot be eliminated completely, IT needs to communicate their concerns to management.  Then, if management decides to sign off on the risks, IT has done their due dlilgence and responsibility now rests on management.  But again, IT must have time to research and test the technology in their environment.  This is no different than the standards of good manufacturing and design:  R&D and QC.

AnandY
User Rank
Gold
Re-3 levels to the plant
AnandY   7/26/2013 6:05:00 AM
NO RATINGS
 Working a truce between the IT and control department seems logical but I think it is more theoretical than practically possible. If the teams couldn't work out an understanding on their own I don't see how they will when sat down together on a round table. Their mantras dangle on the opposite sides of the seesaw thus for the prosperity of one the other will have to take a blow in the neck.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Rob Spiegel   7/25/2013 8:20:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Point well taken, Digerati Ohm. But it works both ways. IT has to understand the plant can't shut down in order for IT to install a patch at 2:00 am. That works for the office PCs, but not for the plant PCs if the plant runs 24/7. I think both conrol and IT have an issue with outside devices. But often the clash between IT and control doesn't have anything to do woth outside devices. it has to do with conflicting mandates.

<<  <  Page 2/7  >  >>
Partner Zone
More Blogs
After more than a century of dedicated service, metals are still upping their game and delivering lighter, stronger bodies and frames to the auto industry.
Suppliers are chipping away at the dominance of the venerable polyvinyl chloride (PVC) electrical cable with rollouts of new environmentally safe, recyclable alternatives.
Most machine design engineers will survey existing component manufacturers for standard linear guide products, limiting what they can do with their designs. Using extruded aluminum profile guides can customize machine designs while shrinking the bill of materials.
The new entity, Celera Motion, will continue to sell Applimotion and MicroE kit-style product lines and leverage their combined integrated assembly expertise.
Weaned on the relatively effortless connectivity of today’s massive variety of consumer electronic products, automation users in the IIoT will likely not tolerate too many competing, piecemeal standards for long. And the Industrial Internet Consortium is trying to preempt history.
Design News Webinar Series
6/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/24/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/11/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
8/13/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Aug 3 - 7, Developing, Testing, and Troubleshooting IPv4 and IPv6 Using Wireshark
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course August 25-27:
Sponsored by Stratasys
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service