JAMES, a robotic bartender, can deliver drinks and speak to customers in English. Developed by the Munich Research and Transfer Institute for Software Intensive Systems as part of ongoing research to create robots that can interact with humans, the robot can take orders and serve drinks, responding to commands from customers. (Source: The Munich Research and Transfer Institute for Software Intensive Systems)
That's a pretty good video, Elizabeth. I don't think this robot will beat the simple efficiency of a human bartender. But who knows, maybe a tweak here and there could get the robot in the running. Wisecracks indeed.
Yes, this robot is a bit slow moving, conversationally repetitive and probably would falter in a real-life, busy bar situation. But who knows what future iterations will bring? It's still quite interesting the tasks engineers are programming robots to achieve, especially in the service industry.
On a busy bar day, perhaps JAMES can do a better job for the masses. I don't know about anyone else, but the combination of a hulking body, small head, and the billowy pirate shirt makes the bot look quite scary. I can see the robot bartender being simplified by something similar to a beverage vending machine. Insert cup, beverage is mixed, poured, and picked up. Just a thought.
Cabe, your point is well taken. I actually thought the robot was a bit scary myself...I am speaking with the company today and will suggest they make some design changes to make JAMES more user friendly, literally! But you're right, perhaps an automated device that's alreaady more recognizable to humans would be a better option.
I agree, Elizabeth, this is interesting. Primitive now, but with tweaking and development, who knows what it might turn into. Early automobiles were nowtmuch of an improvement over the horse and buggy.
Taken as a whole, all the robots we've seen on the designnews.com site in the past year must say something about where we're heading. This is yet another example of a robot that's not yet ready for prime time, but could be ready in another decade, or even less. There must be a lesson in the importance of education here.
Good point, Chuck. The robotic industry keeps throwing unusual -- and often primitive -- motion control functionality at the wall. Some of this is going to gain traction. The auto industry complains about the burden of unionized workers. These days they're turning to suppliers for more and more of the power train development and they're using robots for assembly. In time, automakers may become assembly and marketing companies with the assembly offloaded to robots.
This story also makes me wonder about the education of future engineers, Rob. Increasingly, we're seeing that engineers need to be versed in mechanical, electrical and electronic disciplines. This is especially true in the robotics industry. I think more college curriculums will need to be aware of this trend, and need to offer cross-displinary courses and majors.
Even civil engineering, Chuck. I was recently talking with a civil engineer who explained the the sophisticated electronic grid of timing stoplights. Plus, some of the stoplights here in Albuquerque have cameras that catch red-light runners and speeders. So, everything is electronics these days.
The picture shows two arms, so perhaps one is just for show.
But the robot bartender would certainly be an attention-getting gimmick, but probably not cost effective. But as a learning tool it can certainly provide a bit of value. Of course it will also bring home the fact that artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity. In that aspect it would be entertaining to read about the problems that it runs into.
I have always been irked when people tout their robots as being able to interact socially. The robot in the video really doesn't care if you say hello, and does not need to be thanked. The eyebrows may pretend to convey emotion, but it is a lie.
Baby dolls that cry have been around a very long time. But, children, even from a very young age, understand that the object is a toy and not an infant needing human care. They understand the idea of playing pretend.
But, as robots have become more sophisticated, the ability to truly deceive people is now possible. Some roboticists seem to have deception as a goal, especially when it comes to a more vulnerable population with the subject of elder care.
I think there are genuine issues concerning interaction with people when it comes to planning how to make a robot understandable to people. They need to know what to expect, and how to communicate their wishes to the machine. But, this is not really social interaction; any more than putting a dollar into a vending machine is social interaction. Here is how the dialog should have gone;
Note that if robotic bartenders are not common, a sign nearby should say "Robotic bartender can accept voice requests. Simply state the beverage you want".
Man walks up to vending robot, "Give me a water." Robot, "Here is your water". Then the man leaves without saying anything.
All the "hello"s and "thank you"s are inappropriate.
These are all really good points, cadcoke5. Maybe you're right that we can abandon the usual niceities when interacting with robots and just cut to the chase, and that would make robots more efficient and useful to designers goals for them. However, I have to disagree that roboticists want to deceive people into thinking robots are human. Rather, I think they are trying to create them to be more helpful to humans through their increased ability to interact with them as intuitively as possible within the limits of their machine intelligence. Yes, it is not "social interaction" per se as we would define it as such currently, but perhaps those definitions are shifting as robots become more integrated into the every-day life of humans.
Interesting points cadcoke5. You are quite right with your example (although some indication from the robot that it is ready to accept and input from a particular person might be desireable). From a socially acceptable viewpoint, it could even be said that giving a robot the respect that is given to a human (please, thank you, etc.) actually degrades humanity.
That being said, how many people enter search queries into their favorite online engine in complete sentences: "How do you..." "What is the...". I find that a waste as well.
Samsung's Galaxy line of smartphones used to fare quite well in the repairability department, but last year's flagship S5 model took a tumble, scoring a meh-inducing 5/10. Will the newly redesigned S6 lead us back into star-studded territory, or will we sink further into the depths of a repairability black hole?
In 2003, the world contained just over 500 million Internet-connected devices. By 2010, this figure had risen to 12.5 billion connected objects, almost six devices per individual with access to the Internet. Now, as we move into 2015, the number of connected 'things' is expected to reach 25 billion, ultimately edging toward 50 billion by the end of the decade.
NASA engineer Brian Trease studied abroad in Japan as a high school student and used to fold fast-food wrappers into cranes using origami techniques he learned in library books. Inspired by this, he began to imagine that origami could be applied to building spacecraft components, particularly solar panels that could one day send solar power from space to be used on earth.
Biomedical engineering is one of the fastest growing engineering fields; from medical devices and pharmaceuticals to more cutting-edge areas like tissue, genetic, and neural engineering, US biomedical engineers (BMEs) boast salaries nearly double the annual mean wage and have faster than average job growth.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.